胶质母细胞瘤切除术或活检后化疗的最佳时机:一项基于全国人口的研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13223-4
Dongeun Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Tae Hoon Roh, Se-Hyuk Kim
{"title":"胶质母细胞瘤切除术或活检后化疗的最佳时机:一项基于全国人口的研究。","authors":"Dongeun Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Tae Hoon Roh, Se-Hyuk Kim","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13223-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the optimal timing of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) following surgery for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). The focus was on understanding whether the interval between surgery and CCRT impacts survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Research Database ( https://opendata.hira.or.kr/ ) were collected to retrospectively review 3,586 patients diagnosed with GBM in South Korea between 2008 and 2021. Patients were divided into early CCRT (≤ 21 days between surgery and CCRT) and late CCRT (> 21 days between surgery and CCRT) groups and further categorised based on the type of surgery (biopsy alone or surgical resection). The study estimated overall survival (OS) and conducted univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 19.98 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 19.12-20.86 months). In univariable analysis, the late CCRT group demonstrated a longer median OS compared to the early CCRT group (20.47 vs. 17.94 months, P = 0.0002, log-rank test). However, this difference was not significant in multivariable analysis (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.782-1.091, P = 0.6663). Subgroup analysis revealed that late CCRT was associated with prolonged OS in patients who underwent surgical resection (adjusted HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.752-0.955, P = 0.0065), whereas in the biopsy-alone group, late CCRT was associated with shorter OS (adjusted HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.378-2.346, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who initiated CCRT more than 21 days post-resection demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) compared to those who began CCRT earlier. In contrast, among patients who underwent biopsy alone, initiating CCRT within 21 days was associated with better outcomes. These findings suggest that the optimal timing for CCRT initiation in GBM may depend on the extent of residual tumour.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal timing of chemoradiation after resection or biopsy of glioblastomas: a nationwide population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Dongeun Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Tae Hoon Roh, Se-Hyuk Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-024-13223-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the optimal timing of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) following surgery for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). The focus was on understanding whether the interval between surgery and CCRT impacts survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Research Database ( https://opendata.hira.or.kr/ ) were collected to retrospectively review 3,586 patients diagnosed with GBM in South Korea between 2008 and 2021. Patients were divided into early CCRT (≤ 21 days between surgery and CCRT) and late CCRT (> 21 days between surgery and CCRT) groups and further categorised based on the type of surgery (biopsy alone or surgical resection). The study estimated overall survival (OS) and conducted univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 19.98 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 19.12-20.86 months). In univariable analysis, the late CCRT group demonstrated a longer median OS compared to the early CCRT group (20.47 vs. 17.94 months, P = 0.0002, log-rank test). However, this difference was not significant in multivariable analysis (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.782-1.091, P = 0.6663). Subgroup analysis revealed that late CCRT was associated with prolonged OS in patients who underwent surgical resection (adjusted HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.752-0.955, P = 0.0065), whereas in the biopsy-alone group, late CCRT was associated with shorter OS (adjusted HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.378-2.346, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who initiated CCRT more than 21 days post-resection demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) compared to those who began CCRT earlier. In contrast, among patients who underwent biopsy alone, initiating CCRT within 21 days was associated with better outcomes. These findings suggest that the optimal timing for CCRT initiation in GBM may depend on the extent of residual tumour.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13223-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13223-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究调查了新诊断胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者手术后同期化放疗(CCRT)的最佳时机。重点是了解手术和 CCRT 之间的间隔是否会影响生存结果:方法:从韩国国民健康保险研究数据库(https://opendata.hira.or.kr/)中收集数据,对2008年至2021年间韩国确诊的3586名GBM患者进行回顾性研究。患者被分为早期CCRT组(手术与CCRT之间的间隔时间小于21天)和晚期CCRT组(手术与CCRT之间的间隔时间大于21天),并根据手术类型(单纯活检或手术切除)进一步分类。研究估算了总生存期(OS),并进行了单变量和多变量考克斯回归分析:整个队列的中位总生存期(OS)为 19.98 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI]:19.12-20.86 个月)。在单变量分析中,晚期CCRT组与早期CCRT组相比,中位OS更长(20.47个月 vs. 17.94个月,P = 0.0002,log-rank检验)。然而,这一差异在多变量分析中并不显著(危险比 [HR] = 0.98,95% CI:0.782-1.091,P = 0.6663)。亚组分析显示,在接受手术切除的患者中,晚期CCRT与OS延长相关(调整后HR = 0.85,95% CI:0.752-0.955,P = 0.0065),而在单纯活检组中,晚期CCRT与OS缩短相关(调整后HR = 1.80,95% CI:1.378-2.346,P 结论:晚期CCRT与OS延长相关:与较早开始CCRT的患者相比,切除术后21天以上开始CCRT的患者总生存期(OS)有所改善。相比之下,在仅接受活检的患者中,21天内开始CCRT与更好的预后相关。这些研究结果表明,GBM 开始 CCRT 的最佳时机可能取决于残余肿瘤的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal timing of chemoradiation after resection or biopsy of glioblastomas: a nationwide population-based study.

Background: This study investigated the optimal timing of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) following surgery for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). The focus was on understanding whether the interval between surgery and CCRT impacts survival outcomes.

Methods: Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Research Database ( https://opendata.hira.or.kr/ ) were collected to retrospectively review 3,586 patients diagnosed with GBM in South Korea between 2008 and 2021. Patients were divided into early CCRT (≤ 21 days between surgery and CCRT) and late CCRT (> 21 days between surgery and CCRT) groups and further categorised based on the type of surgery (biopsy alone or surgical resection). The study estimated overall survival (OS) and conducted univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

Results: The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 19.98 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 19.12-20.86 months). In univariable analysis, the late CCRT group demonstrated a longer median OS compared to the early CCRT group (20.47 vs. 17.94 months, P = 0.0002, log-rank test). However, this difference was not significant in multivariable analysis (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.782-1.091, P = 0.6663). Subgroup analysis revealed that late CCRT was associated with prolonged OS in patients who underwent surgical resection (adjusted HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.752-0.955, P = 0.0065), whereas in the biopsy-alone group, late CCRT was associated with shorter OS (adjusted HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.378-2.346, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Patients who initiated CCRT more than 21 days post-resection demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) compared to those who began CCRT earlier. In contrast, among patients who underwent biopsy alone, initiating CCRT within 21 days was associated with better outcomes. These findings suggest that the optimal timing for CCRT initiation in GBM may depend on the extent of residual tumour.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Combined effects of nutrition, inflammatory status, and sleep quality on mortality in cancer survivors. METTL2B m3C RNA transferase: oncogenic role in ovarian cancer progression via regulation of the mTOR/AKT pathway and its link to the tumor immune microenvironment. Optimal timing of chemoradiation after resection or biopsy of glioblastomas: a nationwide population-based study. Association between the dietary inflammatory index and risk of lung cancer: a multi-centered case-control study. Attitudes towards risk-stratified breast cancer screening in Denmark - a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1