植物育种与遗传学的起源。

IF 6.9 2区 生物学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a041714
Nils Roll-Hansen
{"title":"植物育种与遗传学的起源。","authors":"Nils Roll-Hansen","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper argues that the historiography of genetics ∼1900, the formation period of modern science, is too narrow. It lacks attention to plant breeding. Perhaps this omission also narrows the present understanding of fundamental ideas like the genotype/phenotype distinction and the gene concept? There is a mythical story still told in textbooks and at anniversaries: As modern genetics started with the rediscovery of Mendel's laws in 1900, a fateful controversy over continuous or discontinuous variation of heredity between biometricians and Mendelians. Discontinuity appeared as a threat to the Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection. Only by the 1920s was the problem solved by a theory of population genetics founded on the chromosome theory of heredity.<sup>1</sup> However, in plant breeding ∼1900 ideas of heredity and evolution were closely intertwined, and the combination of discontinuous heredity with continuous Darwinian evolution was an obvious option.</p>","PeriodicalId":10494,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant Breeding and the Origins of Genetics.\",\"authors\":\"Nils Roll-Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/cshperspect.a041714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper argues that the historiography of genetics ∼1900, the formation period of modern science, is too narrow. It lacks attention to plant breeding. Perhaps this omission also narrows the present understanding of fundamental ideas like the genotype/phenotype distinction and the gene concept? There is a mythical story still told in textbooks and at anniversaries: As modern genetics started with the rediscovery of Mendel's laws in 1900, a fateful controversy over continuous or discontinuous variation of heredity between biometricians and Mendelians. Discontinuity appeared as a threat to the Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection. Only by the 1920s was the problem solved by a theory of population genetics founded on the chromosome theory of heredity.<sup>1</sup> However, in plant breeding ∼1900 ideas of heredity and evolution were closely intertwined, and the combination of discontinuous heredity with continuous Darwinian evolution was an obvious option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041714\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,现代科学形成时期 1900 年之前的遗传学史学研究过于狭窄。它缺乏对植物育种的关注。也许这种疏忽也缩小了目前对基因型/表型区别和基因概念等基本思想的理解?教科书和周年纪念时仍在讲述一个神话故事:随着 1900 年孟德尔定律的重新发现,现代遗传学拉开了序幕,生物计量学家和孟德尔学派就遗传的连续或不连续变异展开了一场致命的争论。不连续变异对达尔文的自然选择进化论构成了威胁。直到 20 世纪 20 年代,建立在遗传染色体理论基础上的群体遗传学理论才解决了这一问题。1 然而,在 1900 年之前的植物育种领域,遗传和进化的思想是紧密联系在一起的,将不连续遗传与达尔文连续进化论相结合是一个显而易见的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plant Breeding and the Origins of Genetics.

This paper argues that the historiography of genetics ∼1900, the formation period of modern science, is too narrow. It lacks attention to plant breeding. Perhaps this omission also narrows the present understanding of fundamental ideas like the genotype/phenotype distinction and the gene concept? There is a mythical story still told in textbooks and at anniversaries: As modern genetics started with the rediscovery of Mendel's laws in 1900, a fateful controversy over continuous or discontinuous variation of heredity between biometricians and Mendelians. Discontinuity appeared as a threat to the Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection. Only by the 1920s was the problem solved by a theory of population genetics founded on the chromosome theory of heredity.1 However, in plant breeding ∼1900 ideas of heredity and evolution were closely intertwined, and the combination of discontinuous heredity with continuous Darwinian evolution was an obvious option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology offers a comprehensive platform in the molecular life sciences, featuring reviews that span molecular, cell, and developmental biology, genetics, neuroscience, immunology, cancer biology, and molecular pathology. This online publication provides in-depth insights into various topics, making it a valuable resource for those engaged in diverse aspects of biological research.
期刊最新文献
Four-Dimensional Bioprinting: Harnessing Active Mechanics to Build with Living Inks. Plant Breeding and the Origins of Genetics. Telomere Dynamics in Human Health and Disease. The Roles of Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels Underlying Aberrant Calcium Signaling in Blood-Retinal Barrier Dysfunction. The Significance of Mendelism for Evolutionary Theory: A Reassessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1