新开发的 β-内酰胺酶抑制剂阿维巴坦、雷贝他坦和伐博巴坦与抗假性 β-内酰胺类抗生素联用对产 AmpC 的临床铜绿假单胞菌分离物的体外活性。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1007/s10096-024-04965-x
Christophe Le Terrier, Otávio Hallal Ferreira Raro, Alaaeldin Mohamed Saad, Patrice Nordmann, Laurent Poirel
{"title":"新开发的 β-内酰胺酶抑制剂阿维巴坦、雷贝他坦和伐博巴坦与抗假性 β-内酰胺类抗生素联用对产 AmpC 的临床铜绿假单胞菌分离物的体外活性。","authors":"Christophe Le Terrier, Otávio Hallal Ferreira Raro, Alaaeldin Mohamed Saad, Patrice Nordmann, Laurent Poirel","doi":"10.1007/s10096-024-04965-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Overproduction of the intrinsic chromosomally-encoded AmpC β-lactamase is one of the main mechanisms responsible for broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-vitro activity of anti-pseudomonal β-lactam molecules associated with the recently-developed and commercially-available β-lactamase inhibitors, namely avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam, against P. aeruginosa isolates overproducing their AmpC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MIC values of ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftolozane with or without β-lactam inhibitor were determined for 50 AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. MIC breakpoints for resistance were retained at 8 mg/L for β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations containing ceftazidime, cefepime and meropenem, while 4 mg/L was used for those containing imipenem and ceftolozane. The concentration of all β-lactamases inhibitors was fixed at 4 mg/L, except for vaborbactam (8 mg/L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of isolates not being resistant to ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftolozane were found at 12%, 22%, 34%, 8% and 74%, respectively. When combined with avibactam, those rates increased to 60%, 62%, 60%, 46%, and 80%, respectively. The highest rates were found with relebactam-based combinations, being 76%, 64%, 66%, 76% and 84%, respectively. By contrast, associations with vaborbactam did not lead to significantly increased \"non-resistance\" rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that all combinations including relebactam led to higher \"non-resistance\" rates against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. The best activity was achieved by combining ceftolozane and relebactam, that might therefore be considered as an excellent clinical alternative against AmpC overproducers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-vitro activity of newly-developed β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam in combination with anti-pseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics against AmpC-overproducing clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.\",\"authors\":\"Christophe Le Terrier, Otávio Hallal Ferreira Raro, Alaaeldin Mohamed Saad, Patrice Nordmann, Laurent Poirel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10096-024-04965-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Overproduction of the intrinsic chromosomally-encoded AmpC β-lactamase is one of the main mechanisms responsible for broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-vitro activity of anti-pseudomonal β-lactam molecules associated with the recently-developed and commercially-available β-lactamase inhibitors, namely avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam, against P. aeruginosa isolates overproducing their AmpC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MIC values of ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftolozane with or without β-lactam inhibitor were determined for 50 AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. MIC breakpoints for resistance were retained at 8 mg/L for β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations containing ceftazidime, cefepime and meropenem, while 4 mg/L was used for those containing imipenem and ceftolozane. The concentration of all β-lactamases inhibitors was fixed at 4 mg/L, except for vaborbactam (8 mg/L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of isolates not being resistant to ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftolozane were found at 12%, 22%, 34%, 8% and 74%, respectively. When combined with avibactam, those rates increased to 60%, 62%, 60%, 46%, and 80%, respectively. The highest rates were found with relebactam-based combinations, being 76%, 64%, 66%, 76% and 84%, respectively. By contrast, associations with vaborbactam did not lead to significantly increased \\\"non-resistance\\\" rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that all combinations including relebactam led to higher \\\"non-resistance\\\" rates against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. The best activity was achieved by combining ceftolozane and relebactam, that might therefore be considered as an excellent clinical alternative against AmpC overproducers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04965-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04965-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:铜绿假单胞菌体内染色体编码的 AmpC β-内酰胺酶的过度产生是导致其产生广谱 β-内酰胺耐药性的主要机制之一。我们的研究旨在评估与最近开发的市售β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(即阿维巴坦、雷贝他坦和伐博巴坦)相关的抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺分子对铜绿假单胞菌分离株产生过量 AmpC 的体外活性:方法:测定了 50 个铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株对头孢他啶、头孢吡肟、美罗培南、亚胺培南和头孢妥仑(含或不含 β-内酰胺抑制剂)的 MIC 值。含头孢他啶、头孢吡肟和美罗培南的β-内酰胺和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合的耐药性 MIC 断点保留在 8 mg/L,而含亚胺培南和头孢妥仑的组合则为 4 mg/L。除伐巴坦(8 毫克/升)外,所有 β-内酰胺酶抑制剂的浓度均固定为 4 毫克/升:结果发现,对头孢他啶、头孢吡肟、美罗培南、亚胺培南和头孢唑烷不耐药的分离株比例分别为 12%、22%、34%、8% 和 74%。与阿维巴坦合用时,这些比率分别增至 60%、62%、60%、46% 和 80%。以雷巴坦为基础的组合使用率最高,分别为 76%、64%、66%、76% 和 84%。相比之下,与伐博巴坦的组合并没有导致 "无抗药性 "率显著增加:我们的研究结果表明,包括瑞雷巴坦在内的所有联合用药对产AmpC过多的铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的 "无耐药性 "率都较高。头孢羟氨苄和雷巴坦的组合具有最佳活性,因此可被视为针对 AmpC 过量产生菌的最佳临床替代药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-vitro activity of newly-developed β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam in combination with anti-pseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics against AmpC-overproducing clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.

Purpose: Overproduction of the intrinsic chromosomally-encoded AmpC β-lactamase is one of the main mechanisms responsible for broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Our study aimed to evaluate the in-vitro activity of anti-pseudomonal β-lactam molecules associated with the recently-developed and commercially-available β-lactamase inhibitors, namely avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam, against P. aeruginosa isolates overproducing their AmpC.

Methods: MIC values of ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftolozane with or without β-lactam inhibitor were determined for 50 AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. MIC breakpoints for resistance were retained at 8 mg/L for β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations containing ceftazidime, cefepime and meropenem, while 4 mg/L was used for those containing imipenem and ceftolozane. The concentration of all β-lactamases inhibitors was fixed at 4 mg/L, except for vaborbactam (8 mg/L).

Results: The rates of isolates not being resistant to ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftolozane were found at 12%, 22%, 34%, 8% and 74%, respectively. When combined with avibactam, those rates increased to 60%, 62%, 60%, 46%, and 80%, respectively. The highest rates were found with relebactam-based combinations, being 76%, 64%, 66%, 76% and 84%, respectively. By contrast, associations with vaborbactam did not lead to significantly increased "non-resistance" rates.

Conclusion: Our results showed that all combinations including relebactam led to higher "non-resistance" rates against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. The best activity was achieved by combining ceftolozane and relebactam, that might therefore be considered as an excellent clinical alternative against AmpC overproducers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of performances of laboratory methods in diagnosing pulmonary cryptococcosis in 1508 patients having lung biopsy tissues collected: a 6-year retrospective study. Treatment outcomes and their predictors in children hospitalized with varicella complicated by bacterial superinfections after pandemic of COVID-19 - a retrospective multicenter analysis of real-life data in Poland. Vaginal microbiota stability over 18 months in young student women in France. Carbapenem resistant Campylobacter jejuni bacteremia in a Bruton's X-linked agammaglobulinemia patient. Clinical experience with ceftazidime/avibactam for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in neonates and children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1