全国医生抗生素处方偏好相关因素调查》(National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences)。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09195-7
Dongzhe Hong, Aaron S Kesselheim, Robert Morlock, Joshua P Metlay, John H Powers, William B Feldman
{"title":"全国医生抗生素处方偏好相关因素调查》(National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences)。","authors":"Dongzhe Hong, Aaron S Kesselheim, Robert Morlock, Joshua P Metlay, John H Powers, William B Feldman","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09195-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of new infectious disease therapies has become a public health priority given the suboptimal efficacy and adverse effects with current drugs for some patients. Understanding the factors associated with physician antibiotic prescribing preferences can help guide policymakers seeking to incentivize the development of interventions that improve patient outcomes for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the factors associated with physician decision-making when prescribing antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and cellulitis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey in April 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Physicians enrolled in an online panel who reported having prescribed antibiotics within the past year.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Respondents were asked to select 1 to 15 characteristics that they deemed most important. From their selected characteristics, for each type of infection, they were then asked to rank up to five on a scale with 5 points given to the top-scoring characteristic and 1 point to the bottom-scoring. The primary outcome was the mean score for each characteristic across the three types of infections weighted by the number of respondents in the sample, with higher scores indicating higher importance.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Among the 130 physician participants, 106 (82%) completed the survey. Just under half (46%) were female; 89% of respondents were White, 3% Black, and 9% another race, while 15% reported Hispanic ethnicity. The highest-scored factors influencing antibiotic prescription preferences were the cure rate (treatment efficacy) (mean score: 2.87), severity of the infection (1.88), rare but major side effects (1.33), interactions with other drugs (1.33), previous experience and knowledge of the drug (1.19), and future risk of resistant infection to the patient (1.15). Out-of-pocket patient costs were prioritized lowest (mean score: 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In considering which antibiotic to prescribe, physicians prioritize clinical outcomes related to drug efficacy and safety over public health- or economics-focused factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences.\",\"authors\":\"Dongzhe Hong, Aaron S Kesselheim, Robert Morlock, Joshua P Metlay, John H Powers, William B Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09195-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of new infectious disease therapies has become a public health priority given the suboptimal efficacy and adverse effects with current drugs for some patients. Understanding the factors associated with physician antibiotic prescribing preferences can help guide policymakers seeking to incentivize the development of interventions that improve patient outcomes for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the factors associated with physician decision-making when prescribing antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and cellulitis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey in April 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Physicians enrolled in an online panel who reported having prescribed antibiotics within the past year.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Respondents were asked to select 1 to 15 characteristics that they deemed most important. From their selected characteristics, for each type of infection, they were then asked to rank up to five on a scale with 5 points given to the top-scoring characteristic and 1 point to the bottom-scoring. The primary outcome was the mean score for each characteristic across the three types of infections weighted by the number of respondents in the sample, with higher scores indicating higher importance.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Among the 130 physician participants, 106 (82%) completed the survey. Just under half (46%) were female; 89% of respondents were White, 3% Black, and 9% another race, while 15% reported Hispanic ethnicity. The highest-scored factors influencing antibiotic prescription preferences were the cure rate (treatment efficacy) (mean score: 2.87), severity of the infection (1.88), rare but major side effects (1.33), interactions with other drugs (1.33), previous experience and knowledge of the drug (1.19), and future risk of resistant infection to the patient (1.15). Out-of-pocket patient costs were prioritized lowest (mean score: 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In considering which antibiotic to prescribe, physicians prioritize clinical outcomes related to drug efficacy and safety over public health- or economics-focused factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09195-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09195-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于目前的药物对部分患者疗效不佳且存在不良反应,开发新的传染病疗法已成为公共卫生领域的当务之急。了解与医生抗生素处方偏好相关的因素有助于指导政策制定者激励干预措施的开发,从而改善患者治疗和预防传染病的效果:确定医生在为社区获得性肺炎(CAP)、无并发症尿路感染(UTI)和蜂窝组织炎开具抗生素处方时的相关决策因素:设计:2023 年 4 月进行的横断面在线调查:主要测量指标:要求受访者选择1至15个他们认为最重要的特征。根据所选特征,针对每种感染类型,受访者被要求最多按五级评分,得分最高的特征得 5 分,得分最低的特征得 1 分。主要结果是三种感染类型中每种特征的平均得分,按样本中受访者人数加权,得分越高表示重要性越高:在 130 名医生参与者中,106 人(82%)完成了调查。女性略低于半数(46%);89%的受访者为白人,3%为黑人,9%为其他种族,15%为西班牙裔。影响抗生素处方偏好的最高得分因素是治愈率(疗效)(平均分:2.87)、感染的严重程度(1.88)、罕见但主要的副作用(1.33)、与其他药物的相互作用(1.33)、以往的用药经验和知识(1.19)以及患者未来耐药感染的风险(1.15)。患者自付费用的优先级最低(平均分:0.25):结论:在考虑处方哪种抗生素时,医生会优先考虑与药物疗效和安全性相关的临床结果,而不是与公共卫生或经济学相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences.

Background: The development of new infectious disease therapies has become a public health priority given the suboptimal efficacy and adverse effects with current drugs for some patients. Understanding the factors associated with physician antibiotic prescribing preferences can help guide policymakers seeking to incentivize the development of interventions that improve patient outcomes for the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases.

Objectives: To determine the factors associated with physician decision-making when prescribing antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and cellulitis.

Design: A cross-sectional online survey in April 2023.

Participants: Physicians enrolled in an online panel who reported having prescribed antibiotics within the past year.

Main measures: Respondents were asked to select 1 to 15 characteristics that they deemed most important. From their selected characteristics, for each type of infection, they were then asked to rank up to five on a scale with 5 points given to the top-scoring characteristic and 1 point to the bottom-scoring. The primary outcome was the mean score for each characteristic across the three types of infections weighted by the number of respondents in the sample, with higher scores indicating higher importance.

Key results: Among the 130 physician participants, 106 (82%) completed the survey. Just under half (46%) were female; 89% of respondents were White, 3% Black, and 9% another race, while 15% reported Hispanic ethnicity. The highest-scored factors influencing antibiotic prescription preferences were the cure rate (treatment efficacy) (mean score: 2.87), severity of the infection (1.88), rare but major side effects (1.33), interactions with other drugs (1.33), previous experience and knowledge of the drug (1.19), and future risk of resistant infection to the patient (1.15). Out-of-pocket patient costs were prioritized lowest (mean score: 0.25).

Conclusions: In considering which antibiotic to prescribe, physicians prioritize clinical outcomes related to drug efficacy and safety over public health- or economics-focused factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Lead aVR, Forget Me Not. Not All "Negatives" Are Created Equal - Understanding the Impact of Body Mass Index on B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Interpretation in Heart Failure. An Internal Medicine Resident Continuity Clinic at a Federally Qualified Health Center: Structure, Feasibility, and Early Outcomes. Interventions for Long COVID: A Narrative Review. Characterizing Physician Recommendations within Code Status Documentation: A Multicentre Cohort Study and Qualitative Discourse Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1