{"title":"孟德尔随机研究简介。","authors":"Joaquín González Aroca","doi":"10.17235/reed.2024.10917/2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a more rigorous framework than traditional observational studies by using genetic variants to assess causal relationships. Three critical assumptions are necessary for MR validity: relevance, independence, and exclusion restriction. These assumptions ensure that the genetic variants accurately reflect the risk factor's impact on the outcome. By elucidating these key points, this article aims to enhance understanding of MR's strengths and limitations in epidemiological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21342,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief description of Mendelian randomized studies.\",\"authors\":\"Joaquín González Aroca\",\"doi\":\"10.17235/reed.2024.10917/2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a more rigorous framework than traditional observational studies by using genetic variants to assess causal relationships. Three critical assumptions are necessary for MR validity: relevance, independence, and exclusion restriction. These assumptions ensure that the genetic variants accurately reflect the risk factor's impact on the outcome. By elucidating these key points, this article aims to enhance understanding of MR's strengths and limitations in epidemiological research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2024.10917/2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2024.10917/2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Brief description of Mendelian randomized studies.
Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a more rigorous framework than traditional observational studies by using genetic variants to assess causal relationships. Three critical assumptions are necessary for MR validity: relevance, independence, and exclusion restriction. These assumptions ensure that the genetic variants accurately reflect the risk factor's impact on the outcome. By elucidating these key points, this article aims to enhance understanding of MR's strengths and limitations in epidemiological research.
期刊介绍:
La Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) y Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED), publica artículos originales, editoriales, revisiones, casos clínicos, cartas al director, imágenes en patología digestiva, y otros artículos especiales sobre todos los aspectos relativos a las enfermedades digestivas.