多药治疗对接受外周动脉疾病血管重建术患者的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1024/0301-1526/a001164
Philipp Franke, Emmanuel Katsogridakis, Theodosios Bisdas, Athanasios Saratzis, Giovanni Torsello, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Konstantinos Stavroulakis
{"title":"多药治疗对接受外周动脉疾病血管重建术患者的影响。","authors":"Philipp Franke, Emmanuel Katsogridakis, Theodosios Bisdas, Athanasios Saratzis, Giovanni Torsello, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Konstantinos Stavroulakis","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> To evaluate the impact of polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of five or more medications, on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revascularisation for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). <i>Patients and methods:</i> This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive PAD patients treated by surgical, endovascular or hybrid therapy in a tertiary center between January 2017 and December 2017. The composite of amputation and/or death (amputation-free survival; AFS) was the primary endpoint. Mortality, major limb amputation, risk for Major Cardio-Cerobro-vascular Events (MACCE) and re-intervention during follow-up were additionally analyzed. <i>Results:</i> A total of 560 patients (369 male, 66%) were included. Mean age was 72.43 ± 38.67, while the main indication for treatment was lifestyle limiting claudication (330 patients, 59%). Most patients (434, 78%) were treated with endovascular means, and the commonest anatomical site of intervention was the femoropopliteal arterial segment (449 patients, 80%). A total of 409 (73%) met the criteria for polypharmacy. Cox regression analysis showed that polypharmacy was an independent predictor of death (exp: 4.72, p=0.008), MACCE (exp: 2.82, p=0.001), re-intervention (exp 1.51, p=0.0016) and of the composite outcome of AFS (exp: 3.46, p=0.021) but not of major amputation (exp: 1.26, p=0.686). Propensity-score matching analysis showed that even when controlling for comorbidity and procedural characteristics, polypharmacy is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death (p<0.001), MACCE (p<0.001), and re-intervention (p=0.001). <i>Conclusions:</i> In this study, polypharmacy was associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes for patients undergoing revascularisation for symptomatic PAD, without influencing the risk for major limb amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of polypharmacy on patients undergoing revascularisation for peripheral arterial disease.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Franke, Emmanuel Katsogridakis, Theodosios Bisdas, Athanasios Saratzis, Giovanni Torsello, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Konstantinos Stavroulakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0301-1526/a001164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> To evaluate the impact of polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of five or more medications, on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revascularisation for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). <i>Patients and methods:</i> This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive PAD patients treated by surgical, endovascular or hybrid therapy in a tertiary center between January 2017 and December 2017. The composite of amputation and/or death (amputation-free survival; AFS) was the primary endpoint. Mortality, major limb amputation, risk for Major Cardio-Cerobro-vascular Events (MACCE) and re-intervention during follow-up were additionally analyzed. <i>Results:</i> A total of 560 patients (369 male, 66%) were included. Mean age was 72.43 ± 38.67, while the main indication for treatment was lifestyle limiting claudication (330 patients, 59%). Most patients (434, 78%) were treated with endovascular means, and the commonest anatomical site of intervention was the femoropopliteal arterial segment (449 patients, 80%). A total of 409 (73%) met the criteria for polypharmacy. Cox regression analysis showed that polypharmacy was an independent predictor of death (exp: 4.72, p=0.008), MACCE (exp: 2.82, p=0.001), re-intervention (exp 1.51, p=0.0016) and of the composite outcome of AFS (exp: 3.46, p=0.021) but not of major amputation (exp: 1.26, p=0.686). Propensity-score matching analysis showed that even when controlling for comorbidity and procedural characteristics, polypharmacy is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death (p<0.001), MACCE (p<0.001), and re-intervention (p=0.001). <i>Conclusions:</i> In this study, polypharmacy was associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes for patients undergoing revascularisation for symptomatic PAD, without influencing the risk for major limb amputation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"35-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001164\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:评估多重用药(即同时使用五种或五种以上药物)对因无症状外周动脉疾病(PAD)而接受血管重建手术的患者临床预后的影响。患者和方法:这是一项回顾性分析,对象是2017年1月至2017年12月期间在一家三级中心接受手术、血管内或混合疗法治疗的连续PAD患者。截肢和/或死亡的复合死亡率(无截肢生存率;AFS)是主要终点。此外,还分析了死亡率、主要肢体截肢、主要心脑血管事件(MACCE)风险和随访期间的再干预情况。研究结果共纳入 560 名患者(369 名男性,66%)。平均年龄为(72.43 ± 38.67)岁,主要治疗指征为生活方式限制性跛行(330 名患者,占 59%)。大多数患者(434 人,78%)接受了血管内治疗,最常见的介入部位是股动脉段(449 人,80%)。共有 409 名患者(73%)符合多药治疗标准。Cox回归分析显示,多药是死亡(指数:4.72,P=0.008)、MACCE(指数:2.82,P=0.001)、再次介入(指数:1.51,P=0.0016)和AFS综合结果(指数:3.46,P=0.021)的独立预测因素,但不是大截肢(指数:1.26,P=0.686)的独立预测因素。倾向得分匹配分析表明,即使控制了合并症和手术特征,多药治疗仍与较高的心血管死亡风险相关(p结论:在这项研究中,多药治疗与因症状性 PAD 而接受血管重建术的患者的不利临床结果有关,但不会影响主要肢体截肢的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of polypharmacy on patients undergoing revascularisation for peripheral arterial disease.

Background: To evaluate the impact of polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of five or more medications, on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revascularisation for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive PAD patients treated by surgical, endovascular or hybrid therapy in a tertiary center between January 2017 and December 2017. The composite of amputation and/or death (amputation-free survival; AFS) was the primary endpoint. Mortality, major limb amputation, risk for Major Cardio-Cerobro-vascular Events (MACCE) and re-intervention during follow-up were additionally analyzed. Results: A total of 560 patients (369 male, 66%) were included. Mean age was 72.43 ± 38.67, while the main indication for treatment was lifestyle limiting claudication (330 patients, 59%). Most patients (434, 78%) were treated with endovascular means, and the commonest anatomical site of intervention was the femoropopliteal arterial segment (449 patients, 80%). A total of 409 (73%) met the criteria for polypharmacy. Cox regression analysis showed that polypharmacy was an independent predictor of death (exp: 4.72, p=0.008), MACCE (exp: 2.82, p=0.001), re-intervention (exp 1.51, p=0.0016) and of the composite outcome of AFS (exp: 3.46, p=0.021) but not of major amputation (exp: 1.26, p=0.686). Propensity-score matching analysis showed that even when controlling for comorbidity and procedural characteristics, polypharmacy is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death (p<0.001), MACCE (p<0.001), and re-intervention (p=0.001). Conclusions: In this study, polypharmacy was associated with unfavourable clinical outcomes for patients undergoing revascularisation for symptomatic PAD, without influencing the risk for major limb amputation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
期刊最新文献
The routine use of Rivaroxaban as thromboprophylaxis following endovenous thermal ablation. Comparison of ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism. Comparison of the risk scoring systems in long term restenosis due to percutaneous interventions to the superficial femoral artery. The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in hospitalized tobacco smokers with peripheral artery disease. Caffeine and nicotine acutely inhibits flow-mediated vasodilation, but not both are necessarily harmful in the long term.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1