髋关节镜手术后,伴有脊柱或其他主要关节疼痛的患者与髋关节疼痛患者的疗效相当。

Bandar S Alrashedan, Sarah Remedios, Ivan Wong
{"title":"髋关节镜手术后,伴有脊柱或其他主要关节疼痛的患者与髋关节疼痛患者的疗效相当。","authors":"Bandar S Alrashedan, Sarah Remedios, Ivan Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of patients following surgery diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) who also experience low back and other joint pain compared to those with isolated hip pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with FAIS, with or without other joint pain, treated with hip arthroscopy from 2016 to 2020. Excluded cases were patients who had significant arthritis, irreparable labral tear requiring reconstruction, or were lost follow-up. Analysis was carried out in two ways, the first was according to the musculoskeletal morbidity (MSKM) scheme where patients were stratified into four different groups, and the second was according to the presence of any other joint or back pain (MSKM 2-4) compared to hip pain only (MSKM 1). Demographic data was analyzed between the groups. International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33) and Hip Outcome Score (HOS) were used as the primary and secondary outcome measures pre-operatively and a minimum of two years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 patients were included in the study with 37 ​% males and 63 ​% females. Age (years) and body mass index (kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were similar between groups, whereas a statistically greater number of male participants were seen in the hip pain only group (MSKM 1). Pre-operatively, patients with isolated hip pain (MSKM 1), had a higher iHOT-33 scores (p ​< ​0.05), but no statistically significant differences were observed postoperatively between the groups. All groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in iHOT-33 and HOS scores postoperatively compared to pre-operatively (p ​< ​0.05), with 76 ​% meeting the threshold for minimum clinically important difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAIS were significantly greater postoperatively for all patients, despite the presence of other joint or back pain. This study can assist in driving patient expectations following hip arthroscopy for FAIS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients with associated spine or other major joint pain have equivalent outcomes to patients with isolated hip pain after hip arthroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Bandar S Alrashedan, Sarah Remedios, Ivan Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of patients following surgery diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) who also experience low back and other joint pain compared to those with isolated hip pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with FAIS, with or without other joint pain, treated with hip arthroscopy from 2016 to 2020. Excluded cases were patients who had significant arthritis, irreparable labral tear requiring reconstruction, or were lost follow-up. Analysis was carried out in two ways, the first was according to the musculoskeletal morbidity (MSKM) scheme where patients were stratified into four different groups, and the second was according to the presence of any other joint or back pain (MSKM 2-4) compared to hip pain only (MSKM 1). Demographic data was analyzed between the groups. International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33) and Hip Outcome Score (HOS) were used as the primary and secondary outcome measures pre-operatively and a minimum of two years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 patients were included in the study with 37 ​% males and 63 ​% females. Age (years) and body mass index (kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were similar between groups, whereas a statistically greater number of male participants were seen in the hip pain only group (MSKM 1). Pre-operatively, patients with isolated hip pain (MSKM 1), had a higher iHOT-33 scores (p ​< ​0.05), but no statistically significant differences were observed postoperatively between the groups. All groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in iHOT-33 and HOS scores postoperatively compared to pre-operatively (p ​< ​0.05), with 76 ​% meeting the threshold for minimum clinically important difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAIS were significantly greater postoperatively for all patients, despite the presence of other joint or back pain. This study can assist in driving patient expectations following hip arthroscopy for FAIS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估被诊断为股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)且同时伴有腰背痛和其他关节痛的术后患者与单纯髋关节疼痛患者的治疗效果:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2016年至2020年期间接受髋关节镜治疗的被诊断为股骨髋臼撞击综合征并伴有或不伴有其他关节疼痛的患者。排除的病例包括有明显关节炎、不可修复的唇裂需要重建或失去随访的患者。分析以两种方式进行,第一种是根据肌肉骨骼发病率(MSKM)方案将患者分为四组,第二种是根据是否存在其他关节或背部疼痛(MSKM 2-4)与仅存在髋关节疼痛(MSKM 1)进行比较。对各组之间的人口统计学数据进行了分析。国际髋关节结果工具33(iHOT-33)和髋关节结果评分(HOS)作为术前和术后至少两年的主要和次要结果测量指标:共有 131 名患者参与研究,其中男性占 37%,女性占 63%。两组患者的年龄(岁)和体重指数(kg/m2)相似,而仅髋关节疼痛组(MSKM 1)的男性参与者人数明显较多。术前,孤立性髋关节疼痛(MSKM 1)患者的 iHOT-33 评分明显更高(p < 0.05),但术后观察到各组间无明显统计学差异。与术前相比,所有组别术后的 iHOT-33 和 HOS 评分均有统计学意义上的显著改善(P < 0.05),76% 的组别达到了最小临床意义差异的临界值:结论:尽管存在其他关节或背部疼痛,但所有患者在接受髋关节镜手术治疗 FAIS 后,其术后疗效均显著提高。这项研究有助于提高患者对髋关节镜治疗FAIS术后效果的期望值:证据级别:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients with associated spine or other major joint pain have equivalent outcomes to patients with isolated hip pain after hip arthroscopy.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of patients following surgery diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) who also experience low back and other joint pain compared to those with isolated hip pain.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with FAIS, with or without other joint pain, treated with hip arthroscopy from 2016 to 2020. Excluded cases were patients who had significant arthritis, irreparable labral tear requiring reconstruction, or were lost follow-up. Analysis was carried out in two ways, the first was according to the musculoskeletal morbidity (MSKM) scheme where patients were stratified into four different groups, and the second was according to the presence of any other joint or back pain (MSKM 2-4) compared to hip pain only (MSKM 1). Demographic data was analyzed between the groups. International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33) and Hip Outcome Score (HOS) were used as the primary and secondary outcome measures pre-operatively and a minimum of two years postoperatively.

Results: A total of 131 patients were included in the study with 37 ​% males and 63 ​% females. Age (years) and body mass index (kg/m2) were similar between groups, whereas a statistically greater number of male participants were seen in the hip pain only group (MSKM 1). Pre-operatively, patients with isolated hip pain (MSKM 1), had a higher iHOT-33 scores (p ​< ​0.05), but no statistically significant differences were observed postoperatively between the groups. All groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in iHOT-33 and HOS scores postoperatively compared to pre-operatively (p ​< ​0.05), with 76 ​% meeting the threshold for minimum clinically important difference.

Conclusion: Patient-reported outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAIS were significantly greater postoperatively for all patients, despite the presence of other joint or back pain. This study can assist in driving patient expectations following hip arthroscopy for FAIS.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
期刊最新文献
RESPONSE TO ''LETTER TO EDITOR'. Mobile App-Based Monitoring of Recovery After Knee Osteotomy: Patients Take Approximately Five Months to Return to Preoperative Step Counts Despite Limited App Uptake. Return to Sport after First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis in Elite Athletes. Fixation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Leads to Successful Clinical Outcomes in 9 out of 10 Patients: a Systematic Review. The Coraco-Gleno-Scapular Line and Assessing Glenoid Bone Defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1