{"title":"基于深度学习的 CyberKnife Monte Carlo 计划对肺癌患者的剂量预测:可变射束配置的稳健学习。","authors":"Yuchao Miao, Jiwei Li, Ruigang Ge, Chuanbin Xie, Yaoying Liu, Gaolong Zhang, Mingchang Miao, Shouping Xu","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02531-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate calculation of lung cancer dose using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm in CyberKnife (CK) is essential for precise planning. We aim to employ deep learning to directly predict the 3D dose distribution calculated by the MC algorithm, enabling rapid and accurate automatic planning. However, most current methods solely focus on conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy and assume a consistent beam configuration across all patients. This study seeks to develop a more versatile model incorporating variable beam configurations of CK and considering the patient's anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study proposed that the AB (anatomy and beam) model be compared with the control Mask (only anatomy) model. These models are based on a 3D U-Net network to investigate the impact of CK beam encoding information on dose prediction. The study collected 86 lung cancer patients who received CK's built-in MC algorithm plans using different beam configurations for training/validation (66 cases) and testing (20 cases). We compared the gamma passing rate, dose difference maps, and relevant dose-volume metrics to evaluate the model's performance. In addition, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were calculated to assess the spatial correspondence of isodose volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AB model demonstrated superior performance compared to the Mask model, particularly in the trajectory dose of the beam. The DSCs of the AB model were 20-40% higher than that of the Mask model in some dose regions. We achieved approximately 99% for the PTV and generally more than 95% for the organs at risk (OARs) referred to the clinical planning dose in the gamma passing rates (3 mm/3%). Relative to the Mask model, the AB model exhibited more than 90% improvement in small voxels (p < 0.001). The AB model matched well with the clinical plan's dose-volume histograms, and the average dose error for all organs was 1.65 ± 0.69%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our proposed new model signifies a crucial advancement in predicting CK 3D dose distributions for clinical applications. It enables planners to rapidly and precisely predict MC doses for lung cancer based on patient-specific beam configurations and optimize the CK treatment process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose prediction of CyberKnife Monte Carlo plan for lung cancer patients based on deep learning: robust learning of variable beam configurations.\",\"authors\":\"Yuchao Miao, Jiwei Li, Ruigang Ge, Chuanbin Xie, Yaoying Liu, Gaolong Zhang, Mingchang Miao, Shouping Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13014-024-02531-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate calculation of lung cancer dose using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm in CyberKnife (CK) is essential for precise planning. We aim to employ deep learning to directly predict the 3D dose distribution calculated by the MC algorithm, enabling rapid and accurate automatic planning. However, most current methods solely focus on conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy and assume a consistent beam configuration across all patients. This study seeks to develop a more versatile model incorporating variable beam configurations of CK and considering the patient's anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study proposed that the AB (anatomy and beam) model be compared with the control Mask (only anatomy) model. These models are based on a 3D U-Net network to investigate the impact of CK beam encoding information on dose prediction. The study collected 86 lung cancer patients who received CK's built-in MC algorithm plans using different beam configurations for training/validation (66 cases) and testing (20 cases). We compared the gamma passing rate, dose difference maps, and relevant dose-volume metrics to evaluate the model's performance. In addition, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were calculated to assess the spatial correspondence of isodose volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AB model demonstrated superior performance compared to the Mask model, particularly in the trajectory dose of the beam. The DSCs of the AB model were 20-40% higher than that of the Mask model in some dose regions. We achieved approximately 99% for the PTV and generally more than 95% for the organs at risk (OARs) referred to the clinical planning dose in the gamma passing rates (3 mm/3%). Relative to the Mask model, the AB model exhibited more than 90% improvement in small voxels (p < 0.001). The AB model matched well with the clinical plan's dose-volume histograms, and the average dose error for all organs was 1.65 ± 0.69%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our proposed new model signifies a crucial advancement in predicting CK 3D dose distributions for clinical applications. It enables planners to rapidly and precisely predict MC doses for lung cancer based on patient-specific beam configurations and optimize the CK treatment process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587619/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02531-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02531-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:使用 CyberKnife(CK)中的蒙特卡罗(Monte Carlo,MC)算法精确计算肺癌剂量对于精确计划至关重要。我们的目标是利用深度学习直接预测 MC 算法计算出的三维剂量分布,从而实现快速、准确的自动规划。然而,目前的大多数方法只关注传统的调强放射治疗,并假定所有患者的射束配置一致。本研究试图开发一种更通用的模型,将 CK 的不同射束配置纳入其中,并考虑患者的解剖结构:本研究建议将 AB(解剖和射束)模型与对照 Mask(仅解剖)模型进行比较。这些模型基于三维 U-Net 网络,以研究 CK 射束编码信息对剂量预测的影响。研究收集了 86 位肺癌患者,他们接受了 CK 内置 MC 算法计划,并使用不同的射束配置进行训练/验证(66 例)和测试(20 例)。我们比较了伽马通过率、剂量差图和相关剂量体积指标,以评估模型的性能。此外,我们还计算了戴斯相似系数(DSC),以评估等剂量容积的空间对应性:结果:与掩膜模型相比,AB 模型表现出更优越的性能,尤其是在射束的轨迹剂量方面。在某些剂量区域,AB 模型的 DSCs 比 Mask 模型高出 20-40%。根据伽马通过率(3 毫米/3%)的临床计划剂量,我们的 PTV 剂量率达到了约 99%,危险器官(OAR)剂量率普遍超过 95%。与掩膜模型相比,AB 模型在小体素方面的改进超过 90%(p 结论):我们提出的新模型标志着在临床应用中预测 CK 三维剂量分布方面的重要进步。它使规划人员能够根据患者的特定射束配置快速、精确地预测肺癌的 MC 剂量,并优化 CK 治疗过程。
Dose prediction of CyberKnife Monte Carlo plan for lung cancer patients based on deep learning: robust learning of variable beam configurations.
Background: Accurate calculation of lung cancer dose using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm in CyberKnife (CK) is essential for precise planning. We aim to employ deep learning to directly predict the 3D dose distribution calculated by the MC algorithm, enabling rapid and accurate automatic planning. However, most current methods solely focus on conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy and assume a consistent beam configuration across all patients. This study seeks to develop a more versatile model incorporating variable beam configurations of CK and considering the patient's anatomy.
Methods: This study proposed that the AB (anatomy and beam) model be compared with the control Mask (only anatomy) model. These models are based on a 3D U-Net network to investigate the impact of CK beam encoding information on dose prediction. The study collected 86 lung cancer patients who received CK's built-in MC algorithm plans using different beam configurations for training/validation (66 cases) and testing (20 cases). We compared the gamma passing rate, dose difference maps, and relevant dose-volume metrics to evaluate the model's performance. In addition, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were calculated to assess the spatial correspondence of isodose volumes.
Results: The AB model demonstrated superior performance compared to the Mask model, particularly in the trajectory dose of the beam. The DSCs of the AB model were 20-40% higher than that of the Mask model in some dose regions. We achieved approximately 99% for the PTV and generally more than 95% for the organs at risk (OARs) referred to the clinical planning dose in the gamma passing rates (3 mm/3%). Relative to the Mask model, the AB model exhibited more than 90% improvement in small voxels (p < 0.001). The AB model matched well with the clinical plan's dose-volume histograms, and the average dose error for all organs was 1.65 ± 0.69%.
Conclusions: Our proposed new model signifies a crucial advancement in predicting CK 3D dose distributions for clinical applications. It enables planners to rapidly and precisely predict MC doses for lung cancer based on patient-specific beam configurations and optimize the CK treatment process.
Radiation OncologyONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍:
Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.