创伤启发式协作护理对初级保健中抑郁症结果的影响:智利的集群随机对照试验》(Cluster Randomized Control Trial in Chile)。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1370/afm.3184
Verónica G Vitriol, Alfredo Cancino, María de la Luz Aylwin, Soledad Ballesteros, Andrés F Sciolla
{"title":"创伤启发式协作护理对初级保健中抑郁症结果的影响:智利的集群随机对照试验》(Cluster Randomized Control Trial in Chile)。","authors":"Verónica G Vitriol, Alfredo Cancino, María de la Luz Aylwin, Soledad Ballesteros, Andrés F Sciolla","doi":"10.1370/afm.3184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative trauma-informed care (CTIC) for treating depression in primary care in Chile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August 2021 through June 2023, 16 primary care teams in the Maule Region of Chile, were randomly assigned to either the CTIC or usual treatment (UT) group. At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, 115 patients in the CTIC group, and 99 in the UT group, were blindly evaluated. The primary outcome was reduction in depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes included improvement in anxiety symptoms, interpersonal and social functioning, emotional regulation, and adherence. Intention-to-treat data analysis, using analysis of covariance was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 214 patients recruited; 85% were women, and 61% had 4 or more adverse childhood experiences. At 6 months, depressive symptoms declined significantly in the CTIC arm relative to UT (adjusted mean difference [AMD]= -3.09, 95% CI, -4.94 to -1.23; d = -0.46, 95% CI,-0.73 to -0.18; <i>P</i> = .001). Anxiety symptoms exhibited a trend toward improvement in the CTIC vs UT group (AMD = -1.50, 95% CI, -3.03 to 0.31; <i>P</i> = .055). No significant differences were observed in other secondary outcomes, except for adherence, which was significantly higher in the CTIC vs UT groups (AMD = 2.59, 95% CI, 1.80-4.99; <i>P</i> = .035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CTIC approach demonstrated superior outcomes in treating depression and improving adherence compared with UT. Moreover, the observed trends in anxiety improvement warrant further exploration in future research with a larger sample size. It is necessary to assess the effectiveness of this approach in treating more complex, difficult-to-treat forms of depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"22 6","pages":"467-475"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Collaborative, Trauma-Informed Care on Depression Outcomes in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial in Chile.\",\"authors\":\"Verónica G Vitriol, Alfredo Cancino, María de la Luz Aylwin, Soledad Ballesteros, Andrés F Sciolla\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.3184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative trauma-informed care (CTIC) for treating depression in primary care in Chile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August 2021 through June 2023, 16 primary care teams in the Maule Region of Chile, were randomly assigned to either the CTIC or usual treatment (UT) group. At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, 115 patients in the CTIC group, and 99 in the UT group, were blindly evaluated. The primary outcome was reduction in depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes included improvement in anxiety symptoms, interpersonal and social functioning, emotional regulation, and adherence. Intention-to-treat data analysis, using analysis of covariance was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 214 patients recruited; 85% were women, and 61% had 4 or more adverse childhood experiences. At 6 months, depressive symptoms declined significantly in the CTIC arm relative to UT (adjusted mean difference [AMD]= -3.09, 95% CI, -4.94 to -1.23; d = -0.46, 95% CI,-0.73 to -0.18; <i>P</i> = .001). Anxiety symptoms exhibited a trend toward improvement in the CTIC vs UT group (AMD = -1.50, 95% CI, -3.03 to 0.31; <i>P</i> = .055). No significant differences were observed in other secondary outcomes, except for adherence, which was significantly higher in the CTIC vs UT groups (AMD = 2.59, 95% CI, 1.80-4.99; <i>P</i> = .035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CTIC approach demonstrated superior outcomes in treating depression and improving adherence compared with UT. Moreover, the observed trends in anxiety improvement warrant further exploration in future research with a larger sample size. It is necessary to assess the effectiveness of this approach in treating more complex, difficult-to-treat forms of depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"467-475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估创伤知情协作护理(CTIC)在智利初级保健中治疗抑郁症的效果:从 2021 年 8 月到 2023 年 6 月,智利毛莱大区的 16 个初级医疗团队被随机分配到 CTIC 或常规治疗(UT)组。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月期间,对 CTIC 组的 115 名患者和 UT 组的 99 名患者进行了盲法评估。主要结果是抑郁症状减轻。次要结果包括焦虑症状、人际交往和社会功能、情绪调节和依从性的改善。采用协方差分析法进行了意向治疗数据分析:共招募了 214 名患者,其中 85% 为女性,61% 有 4 次或 4 次以上的不良童年经历。6个月后,CTIC治疗组的抑郁症状较UT治疗组显著下降(调整后平均差[AMD]=-3.09,95% CI,-4.94至-1.23;d=-0.46,95% CI,-0.73至-0.18;P=0.001)。焦虑症状在 CTIC 组和 UT 组中有改善趋势(AMD = -1.50, 95% CI, -3.03 to 0.31; P = .055)。在其他次要结果中未观察到明显差异,但坚持治疗的情况除外,CTIC 组与UT 组相比,坚持治疗的情况明显较好(AMD = 2.59,95% CI,1.80-4.99;P = .035):结论:与UT相比,CTIC方法在治疗抑郁症和提高依从性方面效果更佳。此外,观察到的焦虑改善趋势也值得在今后样本量更大的研究中进一步探讨。有必要评估这种方法在治疗更复杂、更难治疗的抑郁症方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Collaborative, Trauma-Informed Care on Depression Outcomes in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Control Trial in Chile.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative trauma-informed care (CTIC) for treating depression in primary care in Chile.

Methods: From August 2021 through June 2023, 16 primary care teams in the Maule Region of Chile, were randomly assigned to either the CTIC or usual treatment (UT) group. At baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, 115 patients in the CTIC group, and 99 in the UT group, were blindly evaluated. The primary outcome was reduction in depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes included improvement in anxiety symptoms, interpersonal and social functioning, emotional regulation, and adherence. Intention-to-treat data analysis, using analysis of covariance was conducted.

Results: There were 214 patients recruited; 85% were women, and 61% had 4 or more adverse childhood experiences. At 6 months, depressive symptoms declined significantly in the CTIC arm relative to UT (adjusted mean difference [AMD]= -3.09, 95% CI, -4.94 to -1.23; d = -0.46, 95% CI,-0.73 to -0.18; P = .001). Anxiety symptoms exhibited a trend toward improvement in the CTIC vs UT group (AMD = -1.50, 95% CI, -3.03 to 0.31; P = .055). No significant differences were observed in other secondary outcomes, except for adherence, which was significantly higher in the CTIC vs UT groups (AMD = 2.59, 95% CI, 1.80-4.99; P = .035).

Conclusions: The CTIC approach demonstrated superior outcomes in treating depression and improving adherence compared with UT. Moreover, the observed trends in anxiety improvement warrant further exploration in future research with a larger sample size. It is necessary to assess the effectiveness of this approach in treating more complex, difficult-to-treat forms of depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a Program Designed to Support Implementation of Prescribing Medication for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care Practices. Evaluation of an AI-Based Voice Biomarker Tool to Detect Signals Consistent With Moderate to Severe Depression. For AI in Primary Care, Start With the Problem. Primary Care Physicians' Responses to Treatment Burden in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Video Analysis in China. The AI Moonshot: What We Need and What We Do Not.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1