体育锻炼干预中的剂量-反应关系:更长的持续时间、课程次数和接触时间是否会促进行为改变?

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1037/hea0001436
Paschal Sheeran, Alexander Kenny, Hannah Evans, Olivia Listrom, Andrea Bermudez, Alexander J Rothman
{"title":"体育锻炼干预中的剂量-反应关系:更长的持续时间、课程次数和接触时间是否会促进行为改变?","authors":"Paschal Sheeran, Alexander Kenny, Hannah Evans, Olivia Listrom, Andrea Bermudez, Alexander J Rothman","doi":"10.1037/hea0001436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We tested whether an intervention's dosage influences health behavior change. Intervention dosage was indexed by the duration of the intervention, the number of sessions, and total contact time in treatment arms of trials to promote physical activity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The research comprised two studies. In Study 1, we synthesized 161 meta-analyses of physical activity interventions to examine the relationship between intervention dosage and intervention impact on physical activity. Study 2 comprised a reanalysis of primary studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationship between the indices of dosage and intervention effect sizes was assessed in 23.6% of meta-analyses, and associations did not differ from zero in 70%-85% of tests (Study 1). In Study 2, we retrieved 838 tests for duration, 370 tests for the number of sessions, and 167 tests for contact time. Duration had a very small negative association with effect sizes (<i>b</i> = -.002, 95% confidence interval [-.003, -.001]); number of sessions and contact time were not related to intervention effectiveness. An exploratory study (<i>N</i> = 50) indicated that health psychology researchers overestimated the association between dosage and effect sizes (<i>r</i><sub>estimates</sub> > .25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although physical activity interventions with a higher dosage are expected to be more effective, the findings showed no relationship between dosage and intervention impact. Intervention dosage may moderate the influence of intervention content rather than directly determine physical activity change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dose-response relationship in physical activity interventions: Does greater duration, number of sessions, and contact time enhance behavior change?\",\"authors\":\"Paschal Sheeran, Alexander Kenny, Hannah Evans, Olivia Listrom, Andrea Bermudez, Alexander J Rothman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hea0001436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We tested whether an intervention's dosage influences health behavior change. Intervention dosage was indexed by the duration of the intervention, the number of sessions, and total contact time in treatment arms of trials to promote physical activity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The research comprised two studies. In Study 1, we synthesized 161 meta-analyses of physical activity interventions to examine the relationship between intervention dosage and intervention impact on physical activity. Study 2 comprised a reanalysis of primary studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationship between the indices of dosage and intervention effect sizes was assessed in 23.6% of meta-analyses, and associations did not differ from zero in 70%-85% of tests (Study 1). In Study 2, we retrieved 838 tests for duration, 370 tests for the number of sessions, and 167 tests for contact time. Duration had a very small negative association with effect sizes (<i>b</i> = -.002, 95% confidence interval [-.003, -.001]); number of sessions and contact time were not related to intervention effectiveness. An exploratory study (<i>N</i> = 50) indicated that health psychology researchers overestimated the association between dosage and effect sizes (<i>r</i><sub>estimates</sub> > .25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although physical activity interventions with a higher dosage are expected to be more effective, the findings showed no relationship between dosage and intervention impact. Intervention dosage may moderate the influence of intervention content rather than directly determine physical activity change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们测试了干预措施的剂量是否会影响健康行为的改变。干预剂量以干预持续时间、疗程次数以及促进体育锻炼试验中治疗组的总接触时间为指标:研究包括两项研究。在研究 1 中,我们综合了 161 项关于体育锻炼干预的荟萃分析,以研究干预剂量与干预对体育锻炼的影响之间的关系。研究 2 包括对主要研究的重新分析:结果:23.6%的荟萃分析评估了干预剂量指数与干预效果大小之间的关系,在70%-85%的测试中,两者之间的关系与零无异(研究1)。在研究 2 中,我们检索了 838 项关于持续时间的测试、370 项关于疗程次数的测试和 167 项关于接触时间的测试。持续时间与效果大小呈极小的负相关(b = -.002,95% 置信区间 [-.003, -.001]);疗程次数和接触时间与干预效果无关。一项探索性研究(N = 50)表明,健康心理学研究人员高估了剂量与效果大小之间的关系(重估价大于 0.25):结论:尽管预期剂量越大的体育锻炼干预措施越有效,但研究结果表明,剂量与干预效果之间没有关系。干预剂量可能会缓和干预内容的影响,而不是直接决定体育锻炼的变化。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The dose-response relationship in physical activity interventions: Does greater duration, number of sessions, and contact time enhance behavior change?

Objectives: We tested whether an intervention's dosage influences health behavior change. Intervention dosage was indexed by the duration of the intervention, the number of sessions, and total contact time in treatment arms of trials to promote physical activity.

Method: The research comprised two studies. In Study 1, we synthesized 161 meta-analyses of physical activity interventions to examine the relationship between intervention dosage and intervention impact on physical activity. Study 2 comprised a reanalysis of primary studies.

Results: The relationship between the indices of dosage and intervention effect sizes was assessed in 23.6% of meta-analyses, and associations did not differ from zero in 70%-85% of tests (Study 1). In Study 2, we retrieved 838 tests for duration, 370 tests for the number of sessions, and 167 tests for contact time. Duration had a very small negative association with effect sizes (b = -.002, 95% confidence interval [-.003, -.001]); number of sessions and contact time were not related to intervention effectiveness. An exploratory study (N = 50) indicated that health psychology researchers overestimated the association between dosage and effect sizes (restimates > .25).

Conclusions: Although physical activity interventions with a higher dosage are expected to be more effective, the findings showed no relationship between dosage and intervention impact. Intervention dosage may moderate the influence of intervention content rather than directly determine physical activity change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
期刊最新文献
Daily social resources as a buffer against stress eating and its consequences. Distress tolerance and perceived cancer-related cognitive impairment in nonmetastatic breast cancer. Individual, dyadic, collaborative planning, physical activity, and nutrition: A randomized controlled trial in parent-child dyads. The more the merrier? Two online experiments on how decoys can increase vaccine uptake. A dynamic bidirectional system of stress processes: Feedback loops between stressors, psychological distress, and physical symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1