Kiera R Murison, Matthew T Warkentin, Elham Khodayari Moez, Yonathan Brhane, Geoffrey Liu, Rayjean J Hung
{"title":"作为肺癌筛查和普通人群预后因素的呼吸功能。","authors":"Kiera R Murison, Matthew T Warkentin, Elham Khodayari Moez, Yonathan Brhane, Geoffrey Liu, Rayjean J Hung","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-428OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Despite advancements in screening, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate respiratory function as a prognostic factor for survival in the UK Biobank, a population-based cohort of over 500,000 participants, and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), a high-risk screening population of over 50,000 screenees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with an incident lung cancer diagnosis and spirometry-assessed lung function were included. Lung cancer was measured as the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity and percentage of predicted FEV1. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the impact of lung function on 5-year overall survival in populations with different baseline lung cancer risks.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>2,690 and 609 patients were included in the analysis from the UK Biobank and the NLST, respectively. In the UK Biobank, a higher percentage of predicted FEV1 and ratio were associated with better survival after lung cancer diagnosis with hazard ratios of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95 - 1.00, per 10% increase) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90 - 1.00, per 10% increase), respectively. No statistically significant results were found when assessing the data from the NLST study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impaired lung function was associated with poorer survival for lung cancer patients in the general population, although this was less clear in a high risk, screening eligible population. This highlights the potential clinical importance of respiratory function as a prognostic factor in lung cancer in the general population and presents a possibility for personalized cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory Function as a Prognostic Factor for Lung Cancer in Screening and General Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Kiera R Murison, Matthew T Warkentin, Elham Khodayari Moez, Yonathan Brhane, Geoffrey Liu, Rayjean J Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-428OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Despite advancements in screening, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate respiratory function as a prognostic factor for survival in the UK Biobank, a population-based cohort of over 500,000 participants, and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), a high-risk screening population of over 50,000 screenees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with an incident lung cancer diagnosis and spirometry-assessed lung function were included. Lung cancer was measured as the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity and percentage of predicted FEV1. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the impact of lung function on 5-year overall survival in populations with different baseline lung cancer risks.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>2,690 and 609 patients were included in the analysis from the UK Biobank and the NLST, respectively. In the UK Biobank, a higher percentage of predicted FEV1 and ratio were associated with better survival after lung cancer diagnosis with hazard ratios of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95 - 1.00, per 10% increase) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90 - 1.00, per 10% increase), respectively. No statistically significant results were found when assessing the data from the NLST study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impaired lung function was associated with poorer survival for lung cancer patients in the general population, although this was less clear in a high risk, screening eligible population. This highlights the potential clinical importance of respiratory function as a prognostic factor in lung cancer in the general population and presents a possibility for personalized cancer management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-428OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-428OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Respiratory Function as a Prognostic Factor for Lung Cancer in Screening and General Populations.
Rationale: Despite advancements in screening, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally.
Objectives: To investigate respiratory function as a prognostic factor for survival in the UK Biobank, a population-based cohort of over 500,000 participants, and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), a high-risk screening population of over 50,000 screenees.
Methods: Participants with an incident lung cancer diagnosis and spirometry-assessed lung function were included. Lung cancer was measured as the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity and percentage of predicted FEV1. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the impact of lung function on 5-year overall survival in populations with different baseline lung cancer risks.
Measurements and main results: 2,690 and 609 patients were included in the analysis from the UK Biobank and the NLST, respectively. In the UK Biobank, a higher percentage of predicted FEV1 and ratio were associated with better survival after lung cancer diagnosis with hazard ratios of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95 - 1.00, per 10% increase) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90 - 1.00, per 10% increase), respectively. No statistically significant results were found when assessing the data from the NLST study.
Conclusions: Impaired lung function was associated with poorer survival for lung cancer patients in the general population, although this was less clear in a high risk, screening eligible population. This highlights the potential clinical importance of respiratory function as a prognostic factor in lung cancer in the general population and presents a possibility for personalized cancer management.