Bijan Roshanravan , Oliver P. Kreuzer , Amanda Buckingham
{"title":"BWM-MARCOS:用于矿产潜力建模的新型混合 MCDM 方法","authors":"Bijan Roshanravan , Oliver P. Kreuzer , Amanda Buckingham","doi":"10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Here we describe the application of a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach termed “Best-Worst-Method-Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution” (BWM-MARCOS) to mineral potential modelling (MPM). The newly proposed BWM-MARCOS technique combines two mathematical frameworks in which the BWM approach is utilised to weight decision criteria (i.e., predictor maps) whilst the MARCOS approach is applied to rank alternatives. A BWM-MARCOS model of orogenic gold mineral systems in the well-endowed Granites-Tanami Orogen (GTO) in Australia's Northern Territory was generated utilising the same study area and set of competent spatial proxies as previously developed and described by Roshanravan et al. (2020), facilitating the benchmarking of the new results against those obtained from previous models. We found the BWM-MARCOS approach to MPM performed better than any of the knowledge-driven (i.e., fuzzy inference system), continuous (i.e., data-driven index overlay, geometric average and fuzzy gamma) and data-driven (i.e., feed-forward deep neural network and ‘original’ random forest) mineral prospectivity models previously developed for the GTO by Roshanravan et al. (2020, 2023b). To further constrain the BWM-MARCOS outputs, the modeled gold potential zones were delimited utilising a concentration-area fractal approach. The areas covered by the prioritised 1st order (top priority) and 2nd order (high priority) targets represent significant reductions of the search space (i.e., >303 times or two orders of magnitude, and >93 times or one order of magnitude, respectively). Any order of magnitude, or greater, reduction of the search space, as achieved in this study, can be considered a hallmark of a well-performing, practically useful targeting approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geochemical Exploration","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 107639"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BWM-MARCOS: A new hybrid MCDM approach for mineral potential modelling\",\"authors\":\"Bijan Roshanravan , Oliver P. Kreuzer , Amanda Buckingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gexplo.2024.107639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Here we describe the application of a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach termed “Best-Worst-Method-Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution” (BWM-MARCOS) to mineral potential modelling (MPM). The newly proposed BWM-MARCOS technique combines two mathematical frameworks in which the BWM approach is utilised to weight decision criteria (i.e., predictor maps) whilst the MARCOS approach is applied to rank alternatives. A BWM-MARCOS model of orogenic gold mineral systems in the well-endowed Granites-Tanami Orogen (GTO) in Australia's Northern Territory was generated utilising the same study area and set of competent spatial proxies as previously developed and described by Roshanravan et al. (2020), facilitating the benchmarking of the new results against those obtained from previous models. We found the BWM-MARCOS approach to MPM performed better than any of the knowledge-driven (i.e., fuzzy inference system), continuous (i.e., data-driven index overlay, geometric average and fuzzy gamma) and data-driven (i.e., feed-forward deep neural network and ‘original’ random forest) mineral prospectivity models previously developed for the GTO by Roshanravan et al. (2020, 2023b). To further constrain the BWM-MARCOS outputs, the modeled gold potential zones were delimited utilising a concentration-area fractal approach. The areas covered by the prioritised 1st order (top priority) and 2nd order (high priority) targets represent significant reductions of the search space (i.e., >303 times or two orders of magnitude, and >93 times or one order of magnitude, respectively). Any order of magnitude, or greater, reduction of the search space, as achieved in this study, can be considered a hallmark of a well-performing, practically useful targeting approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geochemical Exploration\",\"volume\":\"269 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geochemical Exploration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674224002553\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geochemical Exploration","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375674224002553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
BWM-MARCOS: A new hybrid MCDM approach for mineral potential modelling
Here we describe the application of a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach termed “Best-Worst-Method-Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution” (BWM-MARCOS) to mineral potential modelling (MPM). The newly proposed BWM-MARCOS technique combines two mathematical frameworks in which the BWM approach is utilised to weight decision criteria (i.e., predictor maps) whilst the MARCOS approach is applied to rank alternatives. A BWM-MARCOS model of orogenic gold mineral systems in the well-endowed Granites-Tanami Orogen (GTO) in Australia's Northern Territory was generated utilising the same study area and set of competent spatial proxies as previously developed and described by Roshanravan et al. (2020), facilitating the benchmarking of the new results against those obtained from previous models. We found the BWM-MARCOS approach to MPM performed better than any of the knowledge-driven (i.e., fuzzy inference system), continuous (i.e., data-driven index overlay, geometric average and fuzzy gamma) and data-driven (i.e., feed-forward deep neural network and ‘original’ random forest) mineral prospectivity models previously developed for the GTO by Roshanravan et al. (2020, 2023b). To further constrain the BWM-MARCOS outputs, the modeled gold potential zones were delimited utilising a concentration-area fractal approach. The areas covered by the prioritised 1st order (top priority) and 2nd order (high priority) targets represent significant reductions of the search space (i.e., >303 times or two orders of magnitude, and >93 times or one order of magnitude, respectively). Any order of magnitude, or greater, reduction of the search space, as achieved in this study, can be considered a hallmark of a well-performing, practically useful targeting approach.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Geochemical Exploration is mostly dedicated to publication of original studies in exploration and environmental geochemistry and related topics.
Contributions considered of prevalent interest for the journal include researches based on the application of innovative methods to:
define the genesis and the evolution of mineral deposits including transfer of elements in large-scale mineralized areas.
analyze complex systems at the boundaries between bio-geochemistry, metal transport and mineral accumulation.
evaluate effects of historical mining activities on the surface environment.
trace pollutant sources and define their fate and transport models in the near-surface and surface environments involving solid, fluid and aerial matrices.
assess and quantify natural and technogenic radioactivity in the environment.
determine geochemical anomalies and set baseline reference values using compositional data analysis, multivariate statistics and geo-spatial analysis.
assess the impacts of anthropogenic contamination on ecosystems and human health at local and regional scale to prioritize and classify risks through deterministic and stochastic approaches.
Papers dedicated to the presentation of newly developed methods in analytical geochemistry to be applied in the field or in laboratory are also within the topics of interest for the journal.