在澳大利亚最大的 C-ITS 试点项目中考察车联网技术的纵向经验

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.11.013
Michael T Pascale, David Rodwell, Andy Bond, Ronald Schroeter, Andry Rakotonirainy, Ioni Lewis
{"title":"在澳大利亚最大的 C-ITS 试点项目中考察车联网技术的纵向经验","authors":"Michael T Pascale,&nbsp;David Rodwell,&nbsp;Andy Bond,&nbsp;Ronald Schroeter,&nbsp;Andry Rakotonirainy,&nbsp;Ioni Lewis","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Connected Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS) may provide safety and mobility benefits for drivers and other road users by providing timely, safety focused messaging to drivers. However, the knowledge-base regarding drivers’ experiences with C-ITS technology is limited given that interactions with these advanced systems are still relatively uncommon and often constrained by time and place. The current study explored participants’ acceptance of, and experiences with a Human Machine Interface (HMI) that displayed C-ITS warnings, during nine months of participation. The specific warnings included speed and hazardous driving at signalised intersections, road-works zones, and on highways. Importantly, the HMI was installed in each participant’s personal vehicle thereby integrating the C-ITS experience into each participant’s daily routine for an extended period. Subjective data were obtained via four questionnaires focused on drivers’ acceptance and general experiences with the HMI, as part of a large-scale (<em>n</em> = 325) longitudinal Field Operational Test of C-ITS conducted in Ipswich, Queensland, Australia. Analyses exposed several significant factors that predicted acceptance including HMI activation, age, and technology readiness. Subsequent contrasts revealed that significant, but small decreases in mean acceptance following the activation of warnings (use cases) on the HMI likely due to perceived limitations with respect to timing and accuracy. Still, participants’ ratings of the warnings being displayed on the HMI were positive and remained as such throughout the FOT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"108 ","pages":"Pages 89-106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining longitudinal experiences with connected vehicle technology in Australia’s largest C-ITS pilot\",\"authors\":\"Michael T Pascale,&nbsp;David Rodwell,&nbsp;Andy Bond,&nbsp;Ronald Schroeter,&nbsp;Andry Rakotonirainy,&nbsp;Ioni Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2024.11.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Connected Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS) may provide safety and mobility benefits for drivers and other road users by providing timely, safety focused messaging to drivers. However, the knowledge-base regarding drivers’ experiences with C-ITS technology is limited given that interactions with these advanced systems are still relatively uncommon and often constrained by time and place. The current study explored participants’ acceptance of, and experiences with a Human Machine Interface (HMI) that displayed C-ITS warnings, during nine months of participation. The specific warnings included speed and hazardous driving at signalised intersections, road-works zones, and on highways. Importantly, the HMI was installed in each participant’s personal vehicle thereby integrating the C-ITS experience into each participant’s daily routine for an extended period. Subjective data were obtained via four questionnaires focused on drivers’ acceptance and general experiences with the HMI, as part of a large-scale (<em>n</em> = 325) longitudinal Field Operational Test of C-ITS conducted in Ipswich, Queensland, Australia. Analyses exposed several significant factors that predicted acceptance including HMI activation, age, and technology readiness. Subsequent contrasts revealed that significant, but small decreases in mean acceptance following the activation of warnings (use cases) on the HMI likely due to perceived limitations with respect to timing and accuracy. Still, participants’ ratings of the warnings being displayed on the HMI were positive and remained as such throughout the FOT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

互联智能交通系统(C-ITS)可为驾驶员和其他道路使用者提供及时的、以安全为重点的信息,从而为驾驶员和其他道路使用者带来安全和机动性方面的益处。然而,由于与这些先进系统的互动仍相对少见,而且往往受到时间和地点的限制,因此有关驾驶员使用 C-ITS 技术的经验的知识库十分有限。本研究探讨了参与者在九个月的参与过程中对显示 C-ITS 警告的人机界面 (HMI) 的接受程度和使用体验。具体警告内容包括信号灯路口、道路施工区和高速公路上的超速和危险驾驶。重要的是,人机界面被安装在每位参与者的个人车辆上,从而将 C-ITS 体验长期融入每位参与者的日常生活中。作为在澳大利亚昆士兰州伊普斯维奇市进行的 C-ITS 大规模(n = 325)纵向现场操作测试的一部分,我们通过四份调查问卷获得了主观数据,这些问卷主要关注驾驶员对人机界面的接受程度和一般体验。分析表明,有几个重要因素可以预测接受程度,包括人机界面激活度、年龄和技术准备程度。随后的对比显示,在人机界面上激活警告(用例)后,平均接受度出现了明显但较小的下降,这可能是由于在时间和准确性方面存在感知限制。不过,参与者对人机界面上显示的警告的评价仍然是积极的,并且在整个 FOT 过程中都是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining longitudinal experiences with connected vehicle technology in Australia’s largest C-ITS pilot
Connected Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS) may provide safety and mobility benefits for drivers and other road users by providing timely, safety focused messaging to drivers. However, the knowledge-base regarding drivers’ experiences with C-ITS technology is limited given that interactions with these advanced systems are still relatively uncommon and often constrained by time and place. The current study explored participants’ acceptance of, and experiences with a Human Machine Interface (HMI) that displayed C-ITS warnings, during nine months of participation. The specific warnings included speed and hazardous driving at signalised intersections, road-works zones, and on highways. Importantly, the HMI was installed in each participant’s personal vehicle thereby integrating the C-ITS experience into each participant’s daily routine for an extended period. Subjective data were obtained via four questionnaires focused on drivers’ acceptance and general experiences with the HMI, as part of a large-scale (n = 325) longitudinal Field Operational Test of C-ITS conducted in Ipswich, Queensland, Australia. Analyses exposed several significant factors that predicted acceptance including HMI activation, age, and technology readiness. Subsequent contrasts revealed that significant, but small decreases in mean acceptance following the activation of warnings (use cases) on the HMI likely due to perceived limitations with respect to timing and accuracy. Still, participants’ ratings of the warnings being displayed on the HMI were positive and remained as such throughout the FOT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
We all fall for it: Influence of driving experience, level of cognitive control engaged and actual exposure to the driving situations on the Dunning-Kruger effect A mixed methods approach to investigate factors influencing young drivers’ intention to drink and drive: A case study from an alcohol-prohibited country Demographic risk factors and injury severity scores in Substance-use behaviour related traffic crashes Empirical analysis of car-following behavior: Impacts of driver demographics, leading vehicle types, and speed limits on driver behavior and safety Effect of Qatar-based law amendment on pedestrians’ behavioral intentions: A PLS-SEM based analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1