对哮喘患者使用 pMDI 和各种附加设备的便利性进行评估。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY AAPS PharmSciTech Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1208/s12249-024-02998-1
Ahmed M. Abdelfattah, Rania M. Sarhan, Yasmin M. Madney, Ahmed F. Mady, Mohamed E. A. Abdelrahim, Hadeer S. Harb
{"title":"对哮喘患者使用 pMDI 和各种附加设备的便利性进行评估。","authors":"Ahmed M. Abdelfattah,&nbsp;Rania M. Sarhan,&nbsp;Yasmin M. Madney,&nbsp;Ahmed F. Mady,&nbsp;Mohamed E. A. Abdelrahim,&nbsp;Hadeer S. Harb","doi":"10.1208/s12249-024-02998-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study was to assess the use of pMDI alone and pMDI with different spacers in asthmatic patients and to identify any associations between errors in handling the device for the first time and the sessions needed to reach the correct handling method, considering patient demographics and clinical characteristics. A total of 150 Asthmatic patients were crossed over to handle pMDI alone and with add-on inhalable devices (Aerochamber plus, Tips Haler, Able, Dispozable and Aer-8) randomly, without receiving verbal or demonstrative instruction (baseline assessment). The assessment of the inhaler technique was performed using checklists that had been set beforehand. Subsequently, the proper utilization of the inhaler was exhibited, and the patient's inhaler usage was reassessed. The demonstration was repeated until an optimal technique was attained. The number of counselling attempts required to achieve successful management, together with patient demographics and clinical factors, were documented. The mean percentage of total errors at baseline shows that pMDI alone is significantly higher than pMDI attached to add-on devices (53.90 ± 9.71, 32.54 ± 13.93, 24.53 ± 14.93, 21.6 ± 14.48, 25.14 ± 10.99, 27.47 ± 10.28) for pMDI alone, Aerochamber plus, Tips Haler, Able, Dispozable and Aer-8 respectively at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01. Able and Tips Haler spacers are significantly lower than other spacers with pMDI and pMDI alone in terms of total sessions needed to attain the complete optimal handling technique at p &lt; 0.01. Weak and very weak correlations were observed between the percentage of total errors at baseline and the total sessions with education years, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and age as well as some demographics and clinical variables. Handling pMDI can be challenging however the introduction of spacers simplifies this procedure. Different spacers cannot be treated as a homogeneous group due to variations in handling techniques and ease of use. the Able spacer requires the fewest handling steps of any spacer and has the highest percentage of patients who can use it without assistance.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":6925,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSciTech","volume":"25 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1208/s12249-024-02998-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User-Friendliness Evaluation of Handling pMDI with Various Add-on Devices in Asthmatic Patients\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed M. Abdelfattah,&nbsp;Rania M. Sarhan,&nbsp;Yasmin M. Madney,&nbsp;Ahmed F. Mady,&nbsp;Mohamed E. A. Abdelrahim,&nbsp;Hadeer S. Harb\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12249-024-02998-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this study was to assess the use of pMDI alone and pMDI with different spacers in asthmatic patients and to identify any associations between errors in handling the device for the first time and the sessions needed to reach the correct handling method, considering patient demographics and clinical characteristics. A total of 150 Asthmatic patients were crossed over to handle pMDI alone and with add-on inhalable devices (Aerochamber plus, Tips Haler, Able, Dispozable and Aer-8) randomly, without receiving verbal or demonstrative instruction (baseline assessment). The assessment of the inhaler technique was performed using checklists that had been set beforehand. Subsequently, the proper utilization of the inhaler was exhibited, and the patient's inhaler usage was reassessed. The demonstration was repeated until an optimal technique was attained. The number of counselling attempts required to achieve successful management, together with patient demographics and clinical factors, were documented. The mean percentage of total errors at baseline shows that pMDI alone is significantly higher than pMDI attached to add-on devices (53.90 ± 9.71, 32.54 ± 13.93, 24.53 ± 14.93, 21.6 ± 14.48, 25.14 ± 10.99, 27.47 ± 10.28) for pMDI alone, Aerochamber plus, Tips Haler, Able, Dispozable and Aer-8 respectively at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01. Able and Tips Haler spacers are significantly lower than other spacers with pMDI and pMDI alone in terms of total sessions needed to attain the complete optimal handling technique at p &lt; 0.01. Weak and very weak correlations were observed between the percentage of total errors at baseline and the total sessions with education years, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and age as well as some demographics and clinical variables. Handling pMDI can be challenging however the introduction of spacers simplifies this procedure. Different spacers cannot be treated as a homogeneous group due to variations in handling techniques and ease of use. the Able spacer requires the fewest handling steps of any spacer and has the highest percentage of patients who can use it without assistance.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS PharmSciTech\",\"volume\":\"25 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1208/s12249-024-02998-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS PharmSciTech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12249-024-02998-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSciTech","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12249-024-02998-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是评估哮喘患者单独使用 pMDI 和使用带有不同间隔器的 pMDI 的情况,并在考虑患者人口统计学和临床特征的情况下,确定首次操作设备时出现的错误与达到正确操作方法所需的疗程之间是否存在关联。共对 150 名哮喘患者进行了交叉测试,在不接受口头或示范指导(基线评估)的情况下,让他们随机操作单独的 pMDI 和附加吸入器(Aerochamber plus、Tips Haler、Able、Dispozable 和 Aer-8)。对吸入器使用技巧的评估是通过事先设定的检查表进行的。随后,演示如何正确使用吸入器,并重新评估患者的吸入器使用情况。反复演示,直到达到最佳技术为止。成功管理所需的咨询次数以及患者的人口统计学和临床因素都被记录在案。基线总错误的平均百分比显示,单独使用 pMDI、Aerochamber plus、Tips Haler、Able、Dispozable 和 Aer-8 的错误率分别为(53.90 ± 9.71、32.54 ± 13.93、24.53 ± 14.93、21.6 ± 14.48、25.14 ± 10.99、27.47 ± 10.28)和(p),单独使用 pMDI 明显高于附加装置的错误率(53.90 ± 9.71、32.54 ± 13.93、24.53 ± 14.93、21.6 ± 14.48、25.14 ± 10.99、27.47 ± 10.28)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
User-Friendliness Evaluation of Handling pMDI with Various Add-on Devices in Asthmatic Patients

The objective of this study was to assess the use of pMDI alone and pMDI with different spacers in asthmatic patients and to identify any associations between errors in handling the device for the first time and the sessions needed to reach the correct handling method, considering patient demographics and clinical characteristics. A total of 150 Asthmatic patients were crossed over to handle pMDI alone and with add-on inhalable devices (Aerochamber plus, Tips Haler, Able, Dispozable and Aer-8) randomly, without receiving verbal or demonstrative instruction (baseline assessment). The assessment of the inhaler technique was performed using checklists that had been set beforehand. Subsequently, the proper utilization of the inhaler was exhibited, and the patient's inhaler usage was reassessed. The demonstration was repeated until an optimal technique was attained. The number of counselling attempts required to achieve successful management, together with patient demographics and clinical factors, were documented. The mean percentage of total errors at baseline shows that pMDI alone is significantly higher than pMDI attached to add-on devices (53.90 ± 9.71, 32.54 ± 13.93, 24.53 ± 14.93, 21.6 ± 14.48, 25.14 ± 10.99, 27.47 ± 10.28) for pMDI alone, Aerochamber plus, Tips Haler, Able, Dispozable and Aer-8 respectively at p < 0.01. Able and Tips Haler spacers are significantly lower than other spacers with pMDI and pMDI alone in terms of total sessions needed to attain the complete optimal handling technique at p < 0.01. Weak and very weak correlations were observed between the percentage of total errors at baseline and the total sessions with education years, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and age as well as some demographics and clinical variables. Handling pMDI can be challenging however the introduction of spacers simplifies this procedure. Different spacers cannot be treated as a homogeneous group due to variations in handling techniques and ease of use. the Able spacer requires the fewest handling steps of any spacer and has the highest percentage of patients who can use it without assistance.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS PharmSciTech
AAPS PharmSciTech 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
264
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: AAPS PharmSciTech is a peer-reviewed, online-only journal committed to serving those pharmaceutical scientists and engineers interested in the research, development, and evaluation of pharmaceutical dosage forms and delivery systems, including drugs derived from biotechnology and the manufacturing science pertaining to the commercialization of such dosage forms. Because of its electronic nature, AAPS PharmSciTech aspires to utilize evolving electronic technology to enable faster and diverse mechanisms of information delivery to its readership. Submission of uninvited expert reviews and research articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
User-Friendliness Evaluation of Handling pMDI with Various Add-on Devices in Asthmatic Patients The Comparison between Pilot-Grade Spray Dryer and Laboratory-Grade Spray Dryer: Structure, Powder Properties and Application for Direct Compaction Unveiling Swelling and Erosion Dynamics: Early Development Screening of Mirabegron Extended Release Tablets Advancements in Exosome Proteins for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Detection: With a Focus on Nanotechnology Advancements in Antiviral Therapy: Favipiravir Sodium in Nasal Formulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1