{"title":"微创 TLIF 比开放 PLIF 需要手术的 ASP 发生率更低：邻近节段存活率的长期分析","authors":"Young-Ho Roh, Jaewan Soh, Jae Chul Lee, Hae-Dong Jang, Sung-Woo Choi, Byung-Joon Shin","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the incidence of and risk factors for adjacent segment pathology (ASP) requiring surgery among patients previously treated with spinal fusion. Survival of the adjacent segment was compared in patients undergoing open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (O-PLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Compared with O-PLIF, MI-TLIF may reduce ASP in the long term by preserving more of the paraspinal muscle and ligamentous structures connected to adjacent segments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of 740 consecutive patients who had undergone lumbar spinal fusion of 3 or fewer segments. O-PLIF was performed in 564 patients, and MI-TLIF in 176 patients. The incidence and prevalence of revision surgery for ASP were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A risk factor analysis was performed using the log-rank test and a Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After index spinal fusion, 26 patients (3.5%) underwent additional surgery for ASP. Kaplan-Meier analysis predicted a disease-free survival rate of adjacent segments in 87.2% at 10 years after the index operation. The incidence of ASP requiring surgery within 10 years was 16.4% after O-PLIF and 6.1% after MI-TLIF (P=0.045). This result was supported by the Cox regression analysis, which showed a significant difference between MI-TLIF and O-PLIF (P=0.034). The hazard ratio of revision surgery was about 3 times higher with O-PLIF than with MI-TLIF. Patients 65 years or older at the time of the index operation were 2.9 times more likely to undergo revision surgery than those younger than 65 years (P=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MI-TLIF results in less ASP requiring surgery than O-PLIF. 65 years or older is an independent risk factor for ASP. By preserving the soft tissues, MI-TLIF may result in a lower incidence of ASP than the open technique.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower Incidence of ASP Requiring Surgery With Minimally Invasive TLIF Than With Open PLIF: A long-term Analysis of Adjacent Segment Survival.\",\"authors\":\"Young-Ho Roh, Jaewan Soh, Jae Chul Lee, Hae-Dong Jang, Sung-Woo Choi, Byung-Joon Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the incidence of and risk factors for adjacent segment pathology (ASP) requiring surgery among patients previously treated with spinal fusion. Survival of the adjacent segment was compared in patients undergoing open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (O-PLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Compared with O-PLIF, MI-TLIF may reduce ASP in the long term by preserving more of the paraspinal muscle and ligamentous structures connected to adjacent segments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of 740 consecutive patients who had undergone lumbar spinal fusion of 3 or fewer segments. O-PLIF was performed in 564 patients, and MI-TLIF in 176 patients. The incidence and prevalence of revision surgery for ASP were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A risk factor analysis was performed using the log-rank test and a Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After index spinal fusion, 26 patients (3.5%) underwent additional surgery for ASP. Kaplan-Meier analysis predicted a disease-free survival rate of adjacent segments in 87.2% at 10 years after the index operation. The incidence of ASP requiring surgery within 10 years was 16.4% after O-PLIF and 6.1% after MI-TLIF (P=0.045). This result was supported by the Cox regression analysis, which showed a significant difference between MI-TLIF and O-PLIF (P=0.034). The hazard ratio of revision surgery was about 3 times higher with O-PLIF than with MI-TLIF. Patients 65 years or older at the time of the index operation were 2.9 times more likely to undergo revision surgery than those younger than 65 years (P=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MI-TLIF results in less ASP requiring surgery than O-PLIF. 65 years or older is an independent risk factor for ASP. By preserving the soft tissues, MI-TLIF may result in a lower incidence of ASP than the open technique.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001741\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lower Incidence of ASP Requiring Surgery With Minimally Invasive TLIF Than With Open PLIF: A long-term Analysis of Adjacent Segment Survival.
Study design: Retrospective analysis.
Objective: To assess the incidence of and risk factors for adjacent segment pathology (ASP) requiring surgery among patients previously treated with spinal fusion. Survival of the adjacent segment was compared in patients undergoing open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (O-PLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).
Summary of background data: Compared with O-PLIF, MI-TLIF may reduce ASP in the long term by preserving more of the paraspinal muscle and ligamentous structures connected to adjacent segments.
Methods: The study population consisted of 740 consecutive patients who had undergone lumbar spinal fusion of 3 or fewer segments. O-PLIF was performed in 564 patients, and MI-TLIF in 176 patients. The incidence and prevalence of revision surgery for ASP were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A risk factor analysis was performed using the log-rank test and a Cox regression analysis.
Results: After index spinal fusion, 26 patients (3.5%) underwent additional surgery for ASP. Kaplan-Meier analysis predicted a disease-free survival rate of adjacent segments in 87.2% at 10 years after the index operation. The incidence of ASP requiring surgery within 10 years was 16.4% after O-PLIF and 6.1% after MI-TLIF (P=0.045). This result was supported by the Cox regression analysis, which showed a significant difference between MI-TLIF and O-PLIF (P=0.034). The hazard ratio of revision surgery was about 3 times higher with O-PLIF than with MI-TLIF. Patients 65 years or older at the time of the index operation were 2.9 times more likely to undergo revision surgery than those younger than 65 years (P=0.015).
Conclusions: MI-TLIF results in less ASP requiring surgery than O-PLIF. 65 years or older is an independent risk factor for ASP. By preserving the soft tissues, MI-TLIF may result in a lower incidence of ASP than the open technique.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
