以等渗碳酸氢钠为基础的持续血液渗滤法去除氯化物并补充碳酸氢盐:纠正严重代谢性酸中毒的新方法。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s10157-024-02555-x
Yoshihiro Inoue, Yayoi Tsuchihashi, Hassu Kin, Masaaki Nakayama, Yasuhiro Komatsu
{"title":"以等渗碳酸氢钠为基础的持续血液渗滤法去除氯化物并补充碳酸氢盐:纠正严重代谢性酸中毒的新方法。","authors":"Yoshihiro Inoue, Yayoi Tsuchihashi, Hassu Kin, Masaaki Nakayama, Yasuhiro Komatsu","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02555-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous reports highlighted the efficacy of hemofiltration utilizing isotonic sodium bicarbonate solution as replacement fluid for severe metabolic acidosis. This approach corrects metabolic acidosis by eliminating chloride and supplementing bicarbonate. Here, we present the results of an in vitro study aimed at determining the effect of Isotonic sodium bicarbonate-based Continuous HemoDiafiltration (IBB-CHDF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conventional Continuous HemoDiaFiltration (CHDF) and IBB-CHDF utilized aqueous solutions mimicking blood's electrolyte composition. To assess the efficacy and safety, we compared serial changes in pH, HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, and K<sup>+</sup> concentrations. Blood flow rate was 100 mL/min, and the dialysis fluid flow rate maintained 1.0 L/h for both CHDF and IBB-CHDF. Replacement flow rates ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 L/h for CHDF and 0.1 to 1.5 L/h for IBB-CHDF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a replacement flow rate of 0.5 L/h with IBB-CHDF, bicarbonate increased from 14.7 mEq/L to within the physiological range (25.9 mEq/L), whereas in conventional CHDF, the post-treatment bicarbonate concentration did not increase (16.5 mEq/L). The maximum bicarbonate concentration achieved was 22.0 mEq/L at a replacement flow rate of 1.5 L/h in conventional CHDF. Notably, in IBB-CHDF, the sodium concentration remained constant at 150 mEq/L, 10 mEq/L higher than conventional CHDF, and did not escalate despite increasing the replacement flow rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBB-CHDF effectively corrects metabolic acidosis without inducing sodium and water overload by eliminating excess chloride while providing bicarbonate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chloride removal and bicarbonate replacement by isotonic sodium bicarbonate-based continuous hemodiafiltration: a novel method to correct severe metabolic acidosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshihiro Inoue, Yayoi Tsuchihashi, Hassu Kin, Masaaki Nakayama, Yasuhiro Komatsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02555-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous reports highlighted the efficacy of hemofiltration utilizing isotonic sodium bicarbonate solution as replacement fluid for severe metabolic acidosis. This approach corrects metabolic acidosis by eliminating chloride and supplementing bicarbonate. Here, we present the results of an in vitro study aimed at determining the effect of Isotonic sodium bicarbonate-based Continuous HemoDiafiltration (IBB-CHDF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conventional Continuous HemoDiaFiltration (CHDF) and IBB-CHDF utilized aqueous solutions mimicking blood's electrolyte composition. To assess the efficacy and safety, we compared serial changes in pH, HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, and K<sup>+</sup> concentrations. Blood flow rate was 100 mL/min, and the dialysis fluid flow rate maintained 1.0 L/h for both CHDF and IBB-CHDF. Replacement flow rates ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 L/h for CHDF and 0.1 to 1.5 L/h for IBB-CHDF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a replacement flow rate of 0.5 L/h with IBB-CHDF, bicarbonate increased from 14.7 mEq/L to within the physiological range (25.9 mEq/L), whereas in conventional CHDF, the post-treatment bicarbonate concentration did not increase (16.5 mEq/L). The maximum bicarbonate concentration achieved was 22.0 mEq/L at a replacement flow rate of 1.5 L/h in conventional CHDF. Notably, in IBB-CHDF, the sodium concentration remained constant at 150 mEq/L, 10 mEq/L higher than conventional CHDF, and did not escalate despite increasing the replacement flow rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBB-CHDF effectively corrects metabolic acidosis without inducing sodium and water overload by eliminating excess chloride while providing bicarbonate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02555-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02555-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以往的报告强调了利用等渗碳酸氢钠溶液作为替代液进行血液滤过治疗严重代谢性酸中毒的疗效。这种方法通过消除氯化物和补充碳酸氢盐来纠正代谢性酸中毒。在此,我们介绍一项体外研究的结果,旨在确定基于等渗碳酸氢钠的连续血液透析滤过(IBB-CHDF)的效果:方法:传统的连续血液透析过滤(CHDF)和 IBB-CHDF 利用水溶液模拟血液中的电解质成分。为了评估其有效性和安全性,我们比较了 pH、HCO3-、Na+ 和 K+ 浓度的连续变化。血液流速为 100 mL/min,CHDF 和 IBB-CHDF 的透析液流速均为 1.0 L/h。CHDF 的置换流速为 0.5 至 1.5 升/小时,IBB-CHDF 的置换流速为 0.1 至 1.5 升/小时:结果:当 IBB-CHDF 的置换流速为 0.5 L/h 时,碳酸氢盐从 14.7 mEq/L 增加到生理范围内(25.9 mEq/L),而传统 CHDF 治疗后的碳酸氢盐浓度没有增加(16.5 mEq/L)。在常规 CHDF 中,当替代流速为 1.5 升/小时时,所达到的最大碳酸氢盐浓度为 22.0 mEq/L。值得注意的是,在 IBB-CHDF 中,钠浓度始终保持在 150 mEq/L,比传统 CHDF 高 10 mEq/L,而且尽管替代流量增加,钠浓度也没有上升:结论:IBB-CHDF 在提供碳酸氢盐的同时消除了多余的氯化物,从而有效地纠正了代谢性酸中毒,而不会引起钠和水超负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chloride removal and bicarbonate replacement by isotonic sodium bicarbonate-based continuous hemodiafiltration: a novel method to correct severe metabolic acidosis.

Background: Previous reports highlighted the efficacy of hemofiltration utilizing isotonic sodium bicarbonate solution as replacement fluid for severe metabolic acidosis. This approach corrects metabolic acidosis by eliminating chloride and supplementing bicarbonate. Here, we present the results of an in vitro study aimed at determining the effect of Isotonic sodium bicarbonate-based Continuous HemoDiafiltration (IBB-CHDF).

Methods: Conventional Continuous HemoDiaFiltration (CHDF) and IBB-CHDF utilized aqueous solutions mimicking blood's electrolyte composition. To assess the efficacy and safety, we compared serial changes in pH, HCO3-, Na+, and K+ concentrations. Blood flow rate was 100 mL/min, and the dialysis fluid flow rate maintained 1.0 L/h for both CHDF and IBB-CHDF. Replacement flow rates ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 L/h for CHDF and 0.1 to 1.5 L/h for IBB-CHDF.

Results: At a replacement flow rate of 0.5 L/h with IBB-CHDF, bicarbonate increased from 14.7 mEq/L to within the physiological range (25.9 mEq/L), whereas in conventional CHDF, the post-treatment bicarbonate concentration did not increase (16.5 mEq/L). The maximum bicarbonate concentration achieved was 22.0 mEq/L at a replacement flow rate of 1.5 L/h in conventional CHDF. Notably, in IBB-CHDF, the sodium concentration remained constant at 150 mEq/L, 10 mEq/L higher than conventional CHDF, and did not escalate despite increasing the replacement flow rate.

Conclusion: IBB-CHDF effectively corrects metabolic acidosis without inducing sodium and water overload by eliminating excess chloride while providing bicarbonate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal impact of extended-hours hemodialysis with a liberalized diet on nutritional status and survival outcomes: findings from the LIBERTY cohort. Exploring factors associated with Kidney Disease Quality of Life in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: the Reach-J CKD cohort study. Correction: Adolescents and parents' knowledge of chronic kidney disease: the potential of school-based education. Pathophysiology, symptoms, outcomes, and evaluation of hyponatremia: comprehension and best clinical practice. Treatment of hyponatremia: comprehension and best clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1