重新验证头颈癌患者接受螺旋调强放疗时主动胃管放置指南。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.3390/curroncol31110512
Teresa E Brown, Angela Byrnes, Aaron C Chan, Kathleen Dwyer, Anna Edwards, Claire L Blake, Merrilyn D Banks, Brett G M Hughes, Charles Y Lin, Lizbeth M Kenny, Ann-Louise Spurgin, Judith D Bauer
{"title":"重新验证头颈癌患者接受螺旋调强放疗时主动胃管放置指南。","authors":"Teresa E Brown, Angela Byrnes, Aaron C Chan, Kathleen Dwyer, Anna Edwards, Claire L Blake, Merrilyn D Banks, Brett G M Hughes, Charles Y Lin, Lizbeth M Kenny, Ann-Louise Spurgin, Judith D Bauer","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) Swallowing and Nutrition Management Guidelines for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer were developed to enable evidence-based decision-making by the Head and Neck Multidisciplinary Team (H&N MDT) regarding enteral nutrition support options. The purpose of this study was to revalidate these guidelines in a cohort of patients receiving helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) compared to a historical cohort who received primarily 3D-conformal radiotherapy. Eligible patients attending the RBWH H&N MDT between 2013 and 2014 (n = 315) were assessed by the guidelines, with high-risk patients being recommended proactive gastrostomy tube placement. Data were collected on guideline adherence, gastrostomy tube insertions, the duration of enteral tube use and weight change. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive and negative predictive values were calculated and compared with the historical cohort. Overall guideline adherence was 84%, with 60% and 96% adherence to the high-risk and low-risk pathways, respectively. Seventy patients underwent proactive gastrostomy tube placement (n = 62 high-risk; n = 8 low-risk). Validation outcomes were sensitivity 73% (compared to 72%) and specificity 86% (compared to 96%). The guidelines yielded a high sensitivity and specificity, remaining valid in a cohort of patients treated with H-IMRT. Further studies are recommended to improve the sensitivity and understand the decrease in specificity in order to make ongoing guideline improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6938-6955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revalidation of Proactive Gastrostomy Tube Placement Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Helical Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa E Brown, Angela Byrnes, Aaron C Chan, Kathleen Dwyer, Anna Edwards, Claire L Blake, Merrilyn D Banks, Brett G M Hughes, Charles Y Lin, Lizbeth M Kenny, Ann-Louise Spurgin, Judith D Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31110512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) Swallowing and Nutrition Management Guidelines for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer were developed to enable evidence-based decision-making by the Head and Neck Multidisciplinary Team (H&N MDT) regarding enteral nutrition support options. The purpose of this study was to revalidate these guidelines in a cohort of patients receiving helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) compared to a historical cohort who received primarily 3D-conformal radiotherapy. Eligible patients attending the RBWH H&N MDT between 2013 and 2014 (n = 315) were assessed by the guidelines, with high-risk patients being recommended proactive gastrostomy tube placement. Data were collected on guideline adherence, gastrostomy tube insertions, the duration of enteral tube use and weight change. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive and negative predictive values were calculated and compared with the historical cohort. Overall guideline adherence was 84%, with 60% and 96% adherence to the high-risk and low-risk pathways, respectively. Seventy patients underwent proactive gastrostomy tube placement (n = 62 high-risk; n = 8 low-risk). Validation outcomes were sensitivity 73% (compared to 72%) and specificity 86% (compared to 96%). The guidelines yielded a high sensitivity and specificity, remaining valid in a cohort of patients treated with H-IMRT. Further studies are recommended to improve the sensitivity and understand the decrease in specificity in order to make ongoing guideline improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 11\",\"pages\":\"6938-6955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110512\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

布里斯班皇家妇女医院(RBWH)制定了《头颈部癌症患者吞咽和营养管理指南》,以便头颈部多学科小组(H&N MDT)在选择肠内营养支持时做出循证决策。本研究的目的是在接受螺旋调强放疗(H-IMRT)的患者队列中重新验证这些指南,并与主要接受三维适形放疗的历史队列进行比较。2013年至2014年期间,RBWH H&N MDT对符合条件的患者(n = 315)进行了指南评估,并建议高风险患者主动放置胃造瘘管。收集的数据包括指南遵守情况、胃造瘘管插入情况、肠造瘘管使用时间和体重变化。计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,并与历史队列进行了比较。总体指南遵守率为 84%,高风险和低风险路径的遵守率分别为 60% 和 96%。70名患者接受了主动胃造瘘管置入术(n = 62 例高风险患者;n = 8 例低风险患者)。验证结果为灵敏度 73%(对比 72%)和特异度 86%(对比 96%)。该指南具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,在接受 H-IMRT 治疗的患者群中仍然有效。建议开展进一步研究,以提高灵敏度并了解特异性的下降情况,从而不断改进指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revalidation of Proactive Gastrostomy Tube Placement Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Helical Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.

The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) Swallowing and Nutrition Management Guidelines for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer were developed to enable evidence-based decision-making by the Head and Neck Multidisciplinary Team (H&N MDT) regarding enteral nutrition support options. The purpose of this study was to revalidate these guidelines in a cohort of patients receiving helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) compared to a historical cohort who received primarily 3D-conformal radiotherapy. Eligible patients attending the RBWH H&N MDT between 2013 and 2014 (n = 315) were assessed by the guidelines, with high-risk patients being recommended proactive gastrostomy tube placement. Data were collected on guideline adherence, gastrostomy tube insertions, the duration of enteral tube use and weight change. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive and negative predictive values were calculated and compared with the historical cohort. Overall guideline adherence was 84%, with 60% and 96% adherence to the high-risk and low-risk pathways, respectively. Seventy patients underwent proactive gastrostomy tube placement (n = 62 high-risk; n = 8 low-risk). Validation outcomes were sensitivity 73% (compared to 72%) and specificity 86% (compared to 96%). The guidelines yielded a high sensitivity and specificity, remaining valid in a cohort of patients treated with H-IMRT. Further studies are recommended to improve the sensitivity and understand the decrease in specificity in order to make ongoing guideline improvements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Related Differences in Immunotherapy Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Sociocultural and Clinical Determinants of Sexual Dysfunction in Perimenopausal Women with and Without Breast Cancer. Electrochemotherapy in the Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. Exploiting Integrin-αVβ3 to Enhance Radiotherapy Efficacy in Medulloblastoma via Ferroptosis. Fostering the Conversation About Complementary Medicine: Acceptability and Usefulness of Two Communication-Supporting Tools for Patients with Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1