Giovanni Emanuele Ricciardi, Rita Cuciniello, Emanuele De Ponti, Carlo Lunetti, Flavia Pennisi, Carlo Signorelli, Cristina Renzi
{"title":"大肠癌筛查中的残疾与参与:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Giovanni Emanuele Ricciardi, Rita Cuciniello, Emanuele De Ponti, Carlo Lunetti, Flavia Pennisi, Carlo Signorelli, Cristina Renzi","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"7023-7039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Emanuele Ricciardi, Rita Cuciniello, Emanuele De Ponti, Carlo Lunetti, Flavia Pennisi, Carlo Signorelli, Cristina Renzi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31110517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 11\",\"pages\":\"7023-7039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110517\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.
Results: A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).
Conclusions: Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.