大肠癌筛查中的残疾与参与:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.3390/curroncol31110517
Giovanni Emanuele Ricciardi, Rita Cuciniello, Emanuele De Ponti, Carlo Lunetti, Flavia Pennisi, Carlo Signorelli, Cristina Renzi
{"title":"大肠癌筛查中的残疾与参与:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Giovanni Emanuele Ricciardi, Rita Cuciniello, Emanuele De Ponti, Carlo Lunetti, Flavia Pennisi, Carlo Signorelli, Cristina Renzi","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"7023-7039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Emanuele Ricciardi, Rita Cuciniello, Emanuele De Ponti, Carlo Lunetti, Flavia Pennisi, Carlo Signorelli, Cristina Renzi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31110517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 11\",\"pages\":\"7023-7039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110517\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估残疾对参与 CRC 筛查的影响,并确定总体效应大小:本研究旨在评估残疾对参与 CRC 筛查的影响,并确定总体效应大小:我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以比较残疾和非残疾人士参与 CRC 筛查的情况。检索包括五个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Google Scholar、medRxiv)。针对每种 CRC 筛查类型和残疾类别计算了汇总估计值,以综合研究结果。参与 CRC 筛查的情况采用随机效应模型得出:共纳入 20 篇文章,其中大部分来自美国。根据汇总估算,残疾人接受 CRC 筛查的几率低于非残疾人(OR = 0.80,95%CI 0.73-0.87)。按筛查类型进行的分析表明,残疾人接受粪便隐血试验或粪便免疫化学试验的几率较低(OR:0.72,95%CI 0.65-0.81),而接受结肠镜检查的几率则无显著差异。智障人士参与 CRC 筛查的比例明显较低(OR = 0.65,95%CI 0.53-0.79),尤其是 FOBT/FIT(OR = 0.58,95%CI 0.49-0.69):结论:残疾人在参与 CRC 筛查方面存在差异。进一步的研究和协调努力对于开发干预措施以改善这一不可忽视的患者群体的早期癌症诊断至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model.

Results: A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73-0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65-0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.69).

Conclusions: Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Related Differences in Immunotherapy Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Sociocultural and Clinical Determinants of Sexual Dysfunction in Perimenopausal Women with and Without Breast Cancer. Electrochemotherapy in the Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. Exploiting Integrin-αVβ3 to Enhance Radiotherapy Efficacy in Medulloblastoma via Ferroptosis. Fostering the Conversation About Complementary Medicine: Acceptability and Usefulness of Two Communication-Supporting Tools for Patients with Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1