OSA 患者的下颌前突装置:对咬合动力学和牙齿排列修正的影响--一项试验性前瞻性和回顾性研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.3390/dj12110370
Aylin Uyaner, Helen Schneider, Aditya Parikh, Kathrin Paeske-Hinz, Anna Konermann
{"title":"OSA 患者的下颌前突装置:对咬合动力学和牙齿排列修正的影响--一项试验性前瞻性和回顾性研究。","authors":"Aylin Uyaner, Helen Schneider, Aditya Parikh, Kathrin Paeske-Hinz, Anna Konermann","doi":"10.3390/dj12110370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The widespread prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underscores the necessity for effective therapies. Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) have emerged as valid treatment for mild to moderate cases, despite the associated dental side effects. <b>Methods</b>: This study evaluates the nature, onset, and long-term manifestation of these side effects. In the prospective group (<i>n</i> = 12), dental impressions were taken pre-MAD-insertion and at intervals of three, six, nine, and twelve months post-insertion to monitor occlusal alterations. In the retrospective group, participants (<i>n</i> = 8) wearing MADs for 7 years at average underwent lateral cephalogram assessments to compare with pre-treatment X-rays. All participants completed a specific questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed via <i>t</i>-test and with <i>p</i> < 0.05 as the significance level. <b>Results</b>: The majority of participants in both groups consistently used MADs and reported significant sleep quality improvements, rating common symptoms like jaw tension as negligible. In both the prospective group and the retrospective group, significant reductions in overjet were observed at multiple time points, with the prospective group showing reductions at six months (<i>p</i> = 0.001), nine months (<i>p</i> > 0.001), and twelve months (<i>p</i> = 0.019), while the retrospective group indicated a notable decrease between baseline and follow-up assessments after a mean of seven years of device wear (<i>p</i> = 0.004). A slight overbite increase of 0.2 mm was prospectively observed after one year, whereas a trend towards a minimal decrease over the long term was observed in the retrospective sample (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Noteworthy changes in angle class or lower incisor inclination were absent. Cephalograms revealed significant IOK-NL angle alterations with a mean of 98.2° before and 95.2° upon long-term treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that MADs are effective in treating OSA with minor adverse effects. This study advocates for moderate mandibular protrusion to balance therapeutic efficacy with dental health considerations, crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, the limited sample size warrants caution when generalizing these results to the broader population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandibular Advancement Devices in OSA Patients: Impact on Occlusal Dynamics and Tooth Alignment Modifications-A Pilot Prospective and Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Aylin Uyaner, Helen Schneider, Aditya Parikh, Kathrin Paeske-Hinz, Anna Konermann\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj12110370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The widespread prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underscores the necessity for effective therapies. Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) have emerged as valid treatment for mild to moderate cases, despite the associated dental side effects. <b>Methods</b>: This study evaluates the nature, onset, and long-term manifestation of these side effects. In the prospective group (<i>n</i> = 12), dental impressions were taken pre-MAD-insertion and at intervals of three, six, nine, and twelve months post-insertion to monitor occlusal alterations. In the retrospective group, participants (<i>n</i> = 8) wearing MADs for 7 years at average underwent lateral cephalogram assessments to compare with pre-treatment X-rays. All participants completed a specific questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed via <i>t</i>-test and with <i>p</i> < 0.05 as the significance level. <b>Results</b>: The majority of participants in both groups consistently used MADs and reported significant sleep quality improvements, rating common symptoms like jaw tension as negligible. In both the prospective group and the retrospective group, significant reductions in overjet were observed at multiple time points, with the prospective group showing reductions at six months (<i>p</i> = 0.001), nine months (<i>p</i> > 0.001), and twelve months (<i>p</i> = 0.019), while the retrospective group indicated a notable decrease between baseline and follow-up assessments after a mean of seven years of device wear (<i>p</i> = 0.004). A slight overbite increase of 0.2 mm was prospectively observed after one year, whereas a trend towards a minimal decrease over the long term was observed in the retrospective sample (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Noteworthy changes in angle class or lower incisor inclination were absent. Cephalograms revealed significant IOK-NL angle alterations with a mean of 98.2° before and 95.2° upon long-term treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings suggest that MADs are effective in treating OSA with minor adverse effects. This study advocates for moderate mandibular protrusion to balance therapeutic efficacy with dental health considerations, crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, the limited sample size warrants caution when generalizing these results to the broader population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12110370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12110370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的广泛流行凸显了有效治疗的必要性。下颌前突装置(MAD)已成为治疗轻度至中度病例的有效方法,尽管会产生相关的牙科副作用。方法:本研究评估了这些副作用的性质、发生和长期表现。在前瞻性组(n = 12)中,在植入 MAD 前和植入后 3、6、9 和 12 个月的间隔时间取牙印,以监测咬合的改变。在回顾组中,平均佩戴了 7 年 MAD 的参与者(8 人)接受了侧面头颅影像评估,以便与治疗前的 X 光片进行比较。所有参与者都填写了一份特定的调查问卷。统计分析采用 t 检验,显著性水平为 p <0.05。结果两组中的大多数参与者都坚持使用 MAD,并表示睡眠质量有了明显改善,下颌紧张等常见症状几乎可以忽略不计。前瞻性组和回顾性组在多个时间点均观察到过咬合显著减少,前瞻性组在 6 个月(p = 0.001)、9 个月(p > 0.001)和 12 个月(p = 0.019)时均有所减少,而回顾性组在平均佩戴装置 7 年后,基线和随访评估之间的差距明显缩小(p = 0.004)。一年后,前瞻性样本观察到咬合过度略微增加了 0.2 毫米,而回顾性样本观察到咬合过度在长期内略有减少的趋势(p = 0.003)。角度等级或下切牙倾斜度没有显著变化。头影显示 IOK-NL 角发生了显著变化,长期治疗前的平均值为 98.2°,治疗后为 95.2°(p = 0.020)。结论:这些研究结果表明,MADs 可有效治疗 OSA,且不良反应较小。本研究提倡适度的下颌前突,以平衡治疗效果和牙齿健康因素,这对优化治疗效果至关重要。尽管如此,由于样本量有限,在将这些结果推广到更广泛的人群时仍需谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mandibular Advancement Devices in OSA Patients: Impact on Occlusal Dynamics and Tooth Alignment Modifications-A Pilot Prospective and Retrospective Study.

Background: The widespread prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underscores the necessity for effective therapies. Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) have emerged as valid treatment for mild to moderate cases, despite the associated dental side effects. Methods: This study evaluates the nature, onset, and long-term manifestation of these side effects. In the prospective group (n = 12), dental impressions were taken pre-MAD-insertion and at intervals of three, six, nine, and twelve months post-insertion to monitor occlusal alterations. In the retrospective group, participants (n = 8) wearing MADs for 7 years at average underwent lateral cephalogram assessments to compare with pre-treatment X-rays. All participants completed a specific questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed via t-test and with p < 0.05 as the significance level. Results: The majority of participants in both groups consistently used MADs and reported significant sleep quality improvements, rating common symptoms like jaw tension as negligible. In both the prospective group and the retrospective group, significant reductions in overjet were observed at multiple time points, with the prospective group showing reductions at six months (p = 0.001), nine months (p > 0.001), and twelve months (p = 0.019), while the retrospective group indicated a notable decrease between baseline and follow-up assessments after a mean of seven years of device wear (p = 0.004). A slight overbite increase of 0.2 mm was prospectively observed after one year, whereas a trend towards a minimal decrease over the long term was observed in the retrospective sample (p = 0.003). Noteworthy changes in angle class or lower incisor inclination were absent. Cephalograms revealed significant IOK-NL angle alterations with a mean of 98.2° before and 95.2° upon long-term treatment (p = 0.020). Conclusions: These findings suggest that MADs are effective in treating OSA with minor adverse effects. This study advocates for moderate mandibular protrusion to balance therapeutic efficacy with dental health considerations, crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, the limited sample size warrants caution when generalizing these results to the broader population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Inflammatory Scores in Severity Prediction for Elderly Patients with Odontogenic Infections. Long-Term Stability in Temporomandibular Joint Replacement: A Review of Related Variables. Digital Condylar Parameter Assessment Using Cadiax® 2 and Modjaw®. Mandibular Advancement Devices in OSA Patients: Impact on Occlusal Dynamics and Tooth Alignment Modifications-A Pilot Prospective and Retrospective Study. An In Vivo Comparison of Trueness and Precision of Two Novel Methods for Improving Edentulous Full Arch Implant Scanning Accuracy: A Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1