{"title":"利用 UMD-DMD 数据库对杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症的外显子跳跃适用性进行最新分析。","authors":"Jamie Leckie, Abdullah Zia, Toshifumi Yokota","doi":"10.3390/genes15111489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated exon-skipping is an effective approach to restore the disrupted reading frame of the dystrophin gene for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently, four FDA-approved ASOs can target three different exons, but these therapies are mutation-specific and only benefit a subset of patients. Understanding the broad applicability of exon-skipping approaches is essential for prioritizing the development of additional therapies with the greatest potential impact on the DMD population. This review offers an updated analysis of all theoretical exon-skipping strategies and their applicability across the patient population, with a specific focus on DMD-associated mutations documented in the UMD-DMD database. Unlike previous studies, this approach leverages the inclusion of phenotypic data for each mutation, providing a more comprehensive and clinically relevant perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The theoretical applicability of all single and double exon-skipping strategies, along with multi exon-skipping strategies targeting exons 3-9 and 45-55, was evaluated for all DMD mutations reported in the UMD-DMD database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single and double exon-skipping approaches were applicable for 92.8% of large deletions, 93.7% of small lesions, 72.4% of duplications, and 90.3% of all mutations analyzed. Exon 51 was the most relevant target and was applicable for 10.6% of all mutations and 17.2% of large deletions. Additionally, two multi-exon-skipping approaches, targeting exons 45-55 and 3-9, were relevant for 70.6% of large deletions and 19.2% of small lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current FDA-approved ASOs were applicable to 27% of the UMD-DMD population analyzed, leaving a significant portion of patients without access to exon-skipping therapies. The clinical translation of alternative approaches is critical to expanding the accessibility of these therapies for the DMD population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12688,"journal":{"name":"Genes","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Updated Analysis of Exon-Skipping Applicability for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using the UMD-DMD Database.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Leckie, Abdullah Zia, Toshifumi Yokota\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/genes15111489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated exon-skipping is an effective approach to restore the disrupted reading frame of the dystrophin gene for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently, four FDA-approved ASOs can target three different exons, but these therapies are mutation-specific and only benefit a subset of patients. Understanding the broad applicability of exon-skipping approaches is essential for prioritizing the development of additional therapies with the greatest potential impact on the DMD population. This review offers an updated analysis of all theoretical exon-skipping strategies and their applicability across the patient population, with a specific focus on DMD-associated mutations documented in the UMD-DMD database. Unlike previous studies, this approach leverages the inclusion of phenotypic data for each mutation, providing a more comprehensive and clinically relevant perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The theoretical applicability of all single and double exon-skipping strategies, along with multi exon-skipping strategies targeting exons 3-9 and 45-55, was evaluated for all DMD mutations reported in the UMD-DMD database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single and double exon-skipping approaches were applicable for 92.8% of large deletions, 93.7% of small lesions, 72.4% of duplications, and 90.3% of all mutations analyzed. Exon 51 was the most relevant target and was applicable for 10.6% of all mutations and 17.2% of large deletions. Additionally, two multi-exon-skipping approaches, targeting exons 45-55 and 3-9, were relevant for 70.6% of large deletions and 19.2% of small lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current FDA-approved ASOs were applicable to 27% of the UMD-DMD population analyzed, leaving a significant portion of patients without access to exon-skipping therapies. The clinical translation of alternative approaches is critical to expanding the accessibility of these therapies for the DMD population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593839/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Updated Analysis of Exon-Skipping Applicability for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using the UMD-DMD Database.
Background/objectives: Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated exon-skipping is an effective approach to restore the disrupted reading frame of the dystrophin gene for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently, four FDA-approved ASOs can target three different exons, but these therapies are mutation-specific and only benefit a subset of patients. Understanding the broad applicability of exon-skipping approaches is essential for prioritizing the development of additional therapies with the greatest potential impact on the DMD population. This review offers an updated analysis of all theoretical exon-skipping strategies and their applicability across the patient population, with a specific focus on DMD-associated mutations documented in the UMD-DMD database. Unlike previous studies, this approach leverages the inclusion of phenotypic data for each mutation, providing a more comprehensive and clinically relevant perspective.
Methods: The theoretical applicability of all single and double exon-skipping strategies, along with multi exon-skipping strategies targeting exons 3-9 and 45-55, was evaluated for all DMD mutations reported in the UMD-DMD database.
Results: Single and double exon-skipping approaches were applicable for 92.8% of large deletions, 93.7% of small lesions, 72.4% of duplications, and 90.3% of all mutations analyzed. Exon 51 was the most relevant target and was applicable for 10.6% of all mutations and 17.2% of large deletions. Additionally, two multi-exon-skipping approaches, targeting exons 45-55 and 3-9, were relevant for 70.6% of large deletions and 19.2% of small lesions.
Conclusions: Current FDA-approved ASOs were applicable to 27% of the UMD-DMD population analyzed, leaving a significant portion of patients without access to exon-skipping therapies. The clinical translation of alternative approaches is critical to expanding the accessibility of these therapies for the DMD population.
期刊介绍:
Genes (ISSN 2073-4425) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to genes, genetics and genomics. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. There is no restriction on the length of the papers and we encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible.