利用 UMD-DMD 数据库对杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症的外显子跳跃适用性进行最新分析。

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genes Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.3390/genes15111489
Jamie Leckie, Abdullah Zia, Toshifumi Yokota
{"title":"利用 UMD-DMD 数据库对杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症的外显子跳跃适用性进行最新分析。","authors":"Jamie Leckie, Abdullah Zia, Toshifumi Yokota","doi":"10.3390/genes15111489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated exon-skipping is an effective approach to restore the disrupted reading frame of the dystrophin gene for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently, four FDA-approved ASOs can target three different exons, but these therapies are mutation-specific and only benefit a subset of patients. Understanding the broad applicability of exon-skipping approaches is essential for prioritizing the development of additional therapies with the greatest potential impact on the DMD population. This review offers an updated analysis of all theoretical exon-skipping strategies and their applicability across the patient population, with a specific focus on DMD-associated mutations documented in the UMD-DMD database. Unlike previous studies, this approach leverages the inclusion of phenotypic data for each mutation, providing a more comprehensive and clinically relevant perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The theoretical applicability of all single and double exon-skipping strategies, along with multi exon-skipping strategies targeting exons 3-9 and 45-55, was evaluated for all DMD mutations reported in the UMD-DMD database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single and double exon-skipping approaches were applicable for 92.8% of large deletions, 93.7% of small lesions, 72.4% of duplications, and 90.3% of all mutations analyzed. Exon 51 was the most relevant target and was applicable for 10.6% of all mutations and 17.2% of large deletions. Additionally, two multi-exon-skipping approaches, targeting exons 45-55 and 3-9, were relevant for 70.6% of large deletions and 19.2% of small lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current FDA-approved ASOs were applicable to 27% of the UMD-DMD population analyzed, leaving a significant portion of patients without access to exon-skipping therapies. The clinical translation of alternative approaches is critical to expanding the accessibility of these therapies for the DMD population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12688,"journal":{"name":"Genes","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Updated Analysis of Exon-Skipping Applicability for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using the UMD-DMD Database.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Leckie, Abdullah Zia, Toshifumi Yokota\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/genes15111489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated exon-skipping is an effective approach to restore the disrupted reading frame of the dystrophin gene for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently, four FDA-approved ASOs can target three different exons, but these therapies are mutation-specific and only benefit a subset of patients. Understanding the broad applicability of exon-skipping approaches is essential for prioritizing the development of additional therapies with the greatest potential impact on the DMD population. This review offers an updated analysis of all theoretical exon-skipping strategies and their applicability across the patient population, with a specific focus on DMD-associated mutations documented in the UMD-DMD database. Unlike previous studies, this approach leverages the inclusion of phenotypic data for each mutation, providing a more comprehensive and clinically relevant perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The theoretical applicability of all single and double exon-skipping strategies, along with multi exon-skipping strategies targeting exons 3-9 and 45-55, was evaluated for all DMD mutations reported in the UMD-DMD database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single and double exon-skipping approaches were applicable for 92.8% of large deletions, 93.7% of small lesions, 72.4% of duplications, and 90.3% of all mutations analyzed. Exon 51 was the most relevant target and was applicable for 10.6% of all mutations and 17.2% of large deletions. Additionally, two multi-exon-skipping approaches, targeting exons 45-55 and 3-9, were relevant for 70.6% of large deletions and 19.2% of small lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current FDA-approved ASOs were applicable to 27% of the UMD-DMD population analyzed, leaving a significant portion of patients without access to exon-skipping therapies. The clinical translation of alternative approaches is critical to expanding the accessibility of these therapies for the DMD population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593839/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111489\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15111489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:反义寡核苷酸(ASO)介导的外显子跳接是恢复杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)治疗中被破坏的肌营养不良基因阅读框的有效方法。目前,美国食品和药物管理局批准的四种ASO可针对三种不同的外显子,但这些疗法都是针对突变的,只能使一部分患者受益。了解外显子跳越方法的广泛适用性对于优先开发对 DMD 患者具有最大潜在影响的其他疗法至关重要。本综述对所有理论上的外显子跳接策略及其在患者群体中的适用性进行了最新分析,并特别关注了 UMD-DMD 数据库中记录的 DMD 相关突变。与以往的研究不同,这种方法利用了每个突变的表型数据,提供了一个更全面、更贴近临床的视角:方法:针对 UMD-DMD 数据库中报告的所有 DMD 基因突变,评估了所有单、双外显子跳转策略以及针对 3-9 号和 45-55 号外显子的多外显子跳转策略的理论适用性:结果:在分析的所有突变中,92.8%的大缺失、93.7%的小病变、72.4%的重复和90.3%的突变适用于单外显子和双外显子切割策略。外显子 51 是最相关的靶点,适用于 10.6% 的突变和 17.2% 的大缺失。此外,针对45-55号外显子和3-9号外显子的两种多外显子跳转方法适用于70.6%的大缺失和19.2%的小病变:结论:目前美国食品与药物管理局批准的ASO适用于27%的UMD-DMD分析人群,还有相当一部分患者无法获得外显子切割疗法。替代方法的临床转化对于扩大 DMD 患者接受这些疗法的机会至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Updated Analysis of Exon-Skipping Applicability for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using the UMD-DMD Database.

Background/objectives: Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated exon-skipping is an effective approach to restore the disrupted reading frame of the dystrophin gene for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Currently, four FDA-approved ASOs can target three different exons, but these therapies are mutation-specific and only benefit a subset of patients. Understanding the broad applicability of exon-skipping approaches is essential for prioritizing the development of additional therapies with the greatest potential impact on the DMD population. This review offers an updated analysis of all theoretical exon-skipping strategies and their applicability across the patient population, with a specific focus on DMD-associated mutations documented in the UMD-DMD database. Unlike previous studies, this approach leverages the inclusion of phenotypic data for each mutation, providing a more comprehensive and clinically relevant perspective.

Methods: The theoretical applicability of all single and double exon-skipping strategies, along with multi exon-skipping strategies targeting exons 3-9 and 45-55, was evaluated for all DMD mutations reported in the UMD-DMD database.

Results: Single and double exon-skipping approaches were applicable for 92.8% of large deletions, 93.7% of small lesions, 72.4% of duplications, and 90.3% of all mutations analyzed. Exon 51 was the most relevant target and was applicable for 10.6% of all mutations and 17.2% of large deletions. Additionally, two multi-exon-skipping approaches, targeting exons 45-55 and 3-9, were relevant for 70.6% of large deletions and 19.2% of small lesions.

Conclusions: Current FDA-approved ASOs were applicable to 27% of the UMD-DMD population analyzed, leaving a significant portion of patients without access to exon-skipping therapies. The clinical translation of alternative approaches is critical to expanding the accessibility of these therapies for the DMD population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genes
Genes GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1975
审稿时长
22.94 days
期刊介绍: Genes (ISSN 2073-4425) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to genes, genetics and genomics. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. There is no restriction on the length of the papers and we encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of the First Complete Chloroplast Genome of Shizhenia pinguicula (Orchidaceae: Orchideae). An Updated Analysis of Exon-Skipping Applicability for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using the UMD-DMD Database. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in Rice Germplasm Innovation and Genetic Improvement. MIR27A rs895819 CC Genotype Severely Reduces miR-27a Plasma Expression Levels. Multiple Osteochondritis Dissecans as Main Manifestation of Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia Caused by a Novel Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Pathogenic Variant: A Clinical Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1