Varun Karnik, Sebastiano Maria Colombo, Leah Rickards, Silver Heinsar, Louise E See Hoe, Karin Wildi, Margaret R Passmore, Mahe Bouquet, Kei Sato, Carmen Ainola, Nicole Bartnikowski, Emily S Wilson, Kieran Hyslop, Kris Skeggs, Nchafatso G Obonyo, Charles McDonald, Samantha Livingstone, Gabriella Abbate, Andrew Haymet, Jae-Seung Jung, Noriko Sato, Lynnette James, Benjamin Lloyd, Nicole White, Chiara Palmieri, Mark Buckland, Jacky Y Suen, David C McGiffin, John F Fraser, Gianluigi Li Bassi
{"title":"在创新的心脏移植动物模型中,心肺旁路过程中开肺通气与不通气的对比。","authors":"Varun Karnik, Sebastiano Maria Colombo, Leah Rickards, Silver Heinsar, Louise E See Hoe, Karin Wildi, Margaret R Passmore, Mahe Bouquet, Kei Sato, Carmen Ainola, Nicole Bartnikowski, Emily S Wilson, Kieran Hyslop, Kris Skeggs, Nchafatso G Obonyo, Charles McDonald, Samantha Livingstone, Gabriella Abbate, Andrew Haymet, Jae-Seung Jung, Noriko Sato, Lynnette James, Benjamin Lloyd, Nicole White, Chiara Palmieri, Mark Buckland, Jacky Y Suen, David C McGiffin, John F Fraser, Gianluigi Li Bassi","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00669-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open-lung ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) is a potential strategy to mitigate postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We utilized an ovine HTx model to investigate whether open-lung ventilation during CPB reduces postoperative lung damage and complications. Eighteen sheep from an ovine HTx model were included, with ventilatory interventions randomly assigned during CPB: the OPENVENT group received low tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>) of 3 mL/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 8 cm H<sub>2</sub>0, while no ventilation was provided in the NOVENT group as per standard of care. The recipient sheep were monitored for 6 h post-surgery. The primary outcome was histological lung damage, scored at the end of the study. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary shunt, driving pressure, hemodynamics and inflammatory lung infiltration. All animals completed the study. The OPENVENT group showed significantly lower histological lung damage versus the NOVENT group (0.22 vs 0.27, p = 0.042) and lower pulmonary shunt (19.2 vs 32.1%, p = 0.001). In addition, the OPENVENT group exhibited a reduced driving pressure (9.6 cm H<sub>2</sub>O vs. 12.8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, p = 0.039), lower neutrophil (5.25% vs 7.97%, p ≤ 0.001) and macrophage infiltrations (11.1% vs 19.6%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic parameters. In an ovine model of HTx, open-lung ventilation during CPB significantly reduced lung histological injury and inflammatory infiltration. This highlights the value of an open-lung approach during CPB and emphasizes the need for further clinical evidence to decrease risks of lung injury in HTx patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open-lung ventilation versus no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass in an innovative animal model of heart transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Varun Karnik, Sebastiano Maria Colombo, Leah Rickards, Silver Heinsar, Louise E See Hoe, Karin Wildi, Margaret R Passmore, Mahe Bouquet, Kei Sato, Carmen Ainola, Nicole Bartnikowski, Emily S Wilson, Kieran Hyslop, Kris Skeggs, Nchafatso G Obonyo, Charles McDonald, Samantha Livingstone, Gabriella Abbate, Andrew Haymet, Jae-Seung Jung, Noriko Sato, Lynnette James, Benjamin Lloyd, Nicole White, Chiara Palmieri, Mark Buckland, Jacky Y Suen, David C McGiffin, John F Fraser, Gianluigi Li Bassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-024-00669-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Open-lung ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) is a potential strategy to mitigate postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We utilized an ovine HTx model to investigate whether open-lung ventilation during CPB reduces postoperative lung damage and complications. Eighteen sheep from an ovine HTx model were included, with ventilatory interventions randomly assigned during CPB: the OPENVENT group received low tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>) of 3 mL/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 8 cm H<sub>2</sub>0, while no ventilation was provided in the NOVENT group as per standard of care. The recipient sheep were monitored for 6 h post-surgery. The primary outcome was histological lung damage, scored at the end of the study. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary shunt, driving pressure, hemodynamics and inflammatory lung infiltration. All animals completed the study. The OPENVENT group showed significantly lower histological lung damage versus the NOVENT group (0.22 vs 0.27, p = 0.042) and lower pulmonary shunt (19.2 vs 32.1%, p = 0.001). In addition, the OPENVENT group exhibited a reduced driving pressure (9.6 cm H<sub>2</sub>O vs. 12.8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, p = 0.039), lower neutrophil (5.25% vs 7.97%, p ≤ 0.001) and macrophage infiltrations (11.1% vs 19.6%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic parameters. In an ovine model of HTx, open-lung ventilation during CPB significantly reduced lung histological injury and inflammatory infiltration. This highlights the value of an open-lung approach during CPB and emphasizes the need for further clinical evidence to decrease risks of lung injury in HTx patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00669-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00669-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心脏移植(HTx)患者在心肺旁路(CPB)期间进行开胸通气是减轻术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的一种潜在策略。我们利用绵羊心脏移植模型来研究 CPB 期间的开胸通气是否能减少术后肺损伤和并发症。我们纳入了 18 只来自绵羊 HTx 模型的绵羊,并随机分配了 CPB 期间的通气干预:OPENVENT 组接受 3 mL/kg 的低潮气量 (VT) 和 8 cm H20 的呼气末正压 (PEEP),而 NOVENT 组则按照标准护理不提供通气。受试绵羊在手术后接受了 6 小时的监测。主要结果是组织学肺损伤,在研究结束时进行评分。次要结果包括肺分流、驱动压力、血液动力学和肺部炎症浸润。所有动物都完成了研究。OPENVENT 组的肺组织学损伤明显低于 NOVENT 组(0.22 vs 0.27,p = 0.042),肺分流率也明显低于 NOVENT 组(19.2 vs 32.1%,p = 0.001)。此外,OPENVENT 组的驱动压力降低(9.6 cm H2O vs. 12.8 cm H2O,p = 0.039),中性粒细胞(5.25% vs. 7.97%,p ≤ 0.001)和巨噬细胞浸润(11.1% vs. 19.6%,p ≤ 0.001)降低(5.25% vs. 7.97%,p ≤ 0.001)。
Open-lung ventilation versus no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass in an innovative animal model of heart transplantation.
Open-lung ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) is a potential strategy to mitigate postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We utilized an ovine HTx model to investigate whether open-lung ventilation during CPB reduces postoperative lung damage and complications. Eighteen sheep from an ovine HTx model were included, with ventilatory interventions randomly assigned during CPB: the OPENVENT group received low tidal volume (VT) of 3 mL/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 8 cm H20, while no ventilation was provided in the NOVENT group as per standard of care. The recipient sheep were monitored for 6 h post-surgery. The primary outcome was histological lung damage, scored at the end of the study. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary shunt, driving pressure, hemodynamics and inflammatory lung infiltration. All animals completed the study. The OPENVENT group showed significantly lower histological lung damage versus the NOVENT group (0.22 vs 0.27, p = 0.042) and lower pulmonary shunt (19.2 vs 32.1%, p = 0.001). In addition, the OPENVENT group exhibited a reduced driving pressure (9.6 cm H2O vs. 12.8 cm H2O, p = 0.039), lower neutrophil (5.25% vs 7.97%, p ≤ 0.001) and macrophage infiltrations (11.1% vs 19.6%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic parameters. In an ovine model of HTx, open-lung ventilation during CPB significantly reduced lung histological injury and inflammatory infiltration. This highlights the value of an open-lung approach during CPB and emphasizes the need for further clinical evidence to decrease risks of lung injury in HTx patients.