拉科萨胺对局灶性癫痫患者的疗效和血药浓度。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.3390/jcm13226958
Toshiyuki Iwasaki, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Yusaku Miyamoto, Taichi Imaizumi, Shotaro Kaku, Noriko Udagawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Naoki Shimizu
{"title":"拉科萨胺对局灶性癫痫患者的疗效和血药浓度。","authors":"Toshiyuki Iwasaki, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Yusaku Miyamoto, Taichi Imaizumi, Shotaro Kaku, Noriko Udagawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Naoki Shimizu","doi":"10.3390/jcm13226958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: The aim of this paper is to analyze clinical targets for lacosamide (LCM) blood levels in patients with focal epilepsy. Referring to the LCM optimal range will encourage us to think about the importance and usefulness of measuring its blood levels. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 101 (45 female, 56 male) patients were treated with LCM. Blood sampling was performed 1 month after the start of oral medication (the levels reached a steady state) if the LCM treatment had been continued, and then 6 and 12 months after. The efficacy of LCM was evaluated by the reduction in the epileptic seizure rate (RR) at the time of blood sampling. The patients were classified as effective cases (seizure reduction rate ≥ 50%) and ineffective cases (<50%). The actual level, the calculated peak/trough levels, and the levels for each type of seizure were investigated. A statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. <b>Results</b>: A positive correlation was seen between blood levels and dosage (r = 0.446). However, the blood levels and RR showed no correlation. The blood levels were higher in effective cases than in ineffective cases at all time points (measurement <i>p</i> < 0.001, peak <i>p</i> = 0.013, trough <i>p</i> = 0.001). Because the range was set so that the effective and ineffective groups did not overlap, the optimal range of LCM was found to be 8.0-10.5 µg/mL. <b>Conclusions</b>: Measuring and calculating blood levels of LCM and adjusting the dosage to reach the optimal range are recommended. Moreover, the optimal range for LCM was determined as a therapeutic target.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11595134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Blood Levels of Lacosamide in Patients with Focal Epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Toshiyuki Iwasaki, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Yusaku Miyamoto, Taichi Imaizumi, Shotaro Kaku, Noriko Udagawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Naoki Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13226958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: The aim of this paper is to analyze clinical targets for lacosamide (LCM) blood levels in patients with focal epilepsy. Referring to the LCM optimal range will encourage us to think about the importance and usefulness of measuring its blood levels. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 101 (45 female, 56 male) patients were treated with LCM. Blood sampling was performed 1 month after the start of oral medication (the levels reached a steady state) if the LCM treatment had been continued, and then 6 and 12 months after. The efficacy of LCM was evaluated by the reduction in the epileptic seizure rate (RR) at the time of blood sampling. The patients were classified as effective cases (seizure reduction rate ≥ 50%) and ineffective cases (<50%). The actual level, the calculated peak/trough levels, and the levels for each type of seizure were investigated. A statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. <b>Results</b>: A positive correlation was seen between blood levels and dosage (r = 0.446). However, the blood levels and RR showed no correlation. The blood levels were higher in effective cases than in ineffective cases at all time points (measurement <i>p</i> < 0.001, peak <i>p</i> = 0.013, trough <i>p</i> = 0.001). Because the range was set so that the effective and ineffective groups did not overlap, the optimal range of LCM was found to be 8.0-10.5 µg/mL. <b>Conclusions</b>: Measuring and calculating blood levels of LCM and adjusting the dosage to reach the optimal range are recommended. Moreover, the optimal range for LCM was determined as a therapeutic target.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11595134/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226958\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226958","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文旨在分析局灶性癫痫患者拉科酰胺(LCM)血药浓度的临床目标。参考 LCM 的最佳范围将促使我们思考测量其血药浓度的重要性和实用性。方法:共有 101 名患者(45 名女性,56 名男性)接受了 LCM 治疗。如果继续接受 LCM 治疗,则在开始口服药物治疗 1 个月后(血药浓度达到稳定状态)进行血液采样,然后在 6 个月和 12 个月后进行采样。LCM 的疗效根据抽血时癫痫发作率(RR)的降低情况进行评估。患者被分为有效病例(癫痫发作减少率≥50%)和无效病例(结果:有效病例癫痫发作减少率≥50%,无效病例癫痫发作减少率≥50%):血药浓度与剂量呈正相关(r = 0.446)。然而,血药浓度与发作减少率没有相关性。在所有时间点,有效病例的血药浓度均高于无效病例(测量值 p < 0.001,峰值 p = 0.013,谷值 p = 0.001)。由于设定的范围使有效组和无效组不重叠,因此发现 LCM 的最佳范围为 8.0-10.5 µg/mL。结论建议测量和计算 LCM 的血药浓度,并调整剂量以达到最佳范围。此外,LCM 的最佳范围已被确定为治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Blood Levels of Lacosamide in Patients with Focal Epilepsy.

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to analyze clinical targets for lacosamide (LCM) blood levels in patients with focal epilepsy. Referring to the LCM optimal range will encourage us to think about the importance and usefulness of measuring its blood levels. Methods: A total of 101 (45 female, 56 male) patients were treated with LCM. Blood sampling was performed 1 month after the start of oral medication (the levels reached a steady state) if the LCM treatment had been continued, and then 6 and 12 months after. The efficacy of LCM was evaluated by the reduction in the epileptic seizure rate (RR) at the time of blood sampling. The patients were classified as effective cases (seizure reduction rate ≥ 50%) and ineffective cases (<50%). The actual level, the calculated peak/trough levels, and the levels for each type of seizure were investigated. A statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: A positive correlation was seen between blood levels and dosage (r = 0.446). However, the blood levels and RR showed no correlation. The blood levels were higher in effective cases than in ineffective cases at all time points (measurement p < 0.001, peak p = 0.013, trough p = 0.001). Because the range was set so that the effective and ineffective groups did not overlap, the optimal range of LCM was found to be 8.0-10.5 µg/mL. Conclusions: Measuring and calculating blood levels of LCM and adjusting the dosage to reach the optimal range are recommended. Moreover, the optimal range for LCM was determined as a therapeutic target.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Co-Occurrence of Psoriasis and Asthma in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evaluation of Mesh Closure of Laparotomy and Extraction Incisions in Open and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anticoagulation Management for Veno-Venous ECMO in COVID-19 Patients: Argatroban as Rescue Therapy in Heparin-Associated Thrombocytopenia. Comparative Effect of Insulin Resistance Reduction and Hormonal Alterations on Type 2 Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery. Association Between Anaesthesiologists' Sex and Anaesthesiology Quality Metrics and Postoperative Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1