PowerGlide Pro 中线导管的临床评估--包括前列腺素在内的各种药物的停留时间、并发症和疗效。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03546-y
Yaser Souri, Edgar Franklin Hernandez Cancino, Hagen Kerndl, Alexander Hyhlik-Duerr, Yvonne Gosslau
{"title":"PowerGlide Pro 中线导管的临床评估--包括前列腺素在内的各种药物的停留时间、并发症和疗效。","authors":"Yaser Souri, Edgar Franklin Hernandez Cancino, Hagen Kerndl, Alexander Hyhlik-Duerr, Yvonne Gosslau","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03546-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheter is a peripheral venous access device with a length of 8-10 cm, allowing the tip to reach far into the venous system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dwell time of the catheter. Secondary endpoints included suitability for specific medications (e.g. prostaglandins) and assessment of complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2019 and November 2021, 50 patients were included in the study. Data on patient demographics, placement characteristics, complications and reasons for removal, were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Placement was technically successful in 92% (n = 46) of cases. In all cases, veins of the upper extremity were punctured (34 basilic veins, 7 brachial veins, 6 cephalic veins, and 3 median cubital veins). The average dwell time was 6.1 days (1-17 days). A significant difference between duration and medication administered could not be demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The longer maximum dwell time compared to a standard peripheral venous catheter makes it particularly suitable for intravenous therapy for more than 7 days or patients who have poor peripheral vein status.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of the PowerGlide Pro midline catheter- dwell time, complications and outcomes for various medications including prostaglandins.\",\"authors\":\"Yaser Souri, Edgar Franklin Hernandez Cancino, Hagen Kerndl, Alexander Hyhlik-Duerr, Yvonne Gosslau\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-024-03546-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheter is a peripheral venous access device with a length of 8-10 cm, allowing the tip to reach far into the venous system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dwell time of the catheter. Secondary endpoints included suitability for specific medications (e.g. prostaglandins) and assessment of complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2019 and November 2021, 50 patients were included in the study. Data on patient demographics, placement characteristics, complications and reasons for removal, were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Placement was technically successful in 92% (n = 46) of cases. In all cases, veins of the upper extremity were punctured (34 basilic veins, 7 brachial veins, 6 cephalic veins, and 3 median cubital veins). The average dwell time was 6.1 days (1-17 days). A significant difference between duration and medication administered could not be demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The longer maximum dwell time compared to a standard peripheral venous catheter makes it particularly suitable for intravenous therapy for more than 7 days or patients who have poor peripheral vein status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"409 1\",\"pages\":\"363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03546-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03546-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:PowerGlide Pro™ 中线导管是一种外周静脉通路装置,长度为 8-10 厘米,其尖端可深入静脉系统。本研究的目的是评估导管的停留时间。次要终点包括特定药物(如前列腺素)的适用性和并发症评估:方法:2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 11 月期间,50 名患者参与了研究。收集了有关患者人口统计学、置入特征、并发症和移除原因的数据:结果:92%(n = 46)的病例在技术上成功置入。所有病例均穿刺了上肢静脉(34 条基底静脉、7 条肱静脉、6 条头静脉和 3 条肘正中静脉)。平均停留时间为 6.1 天(1-17 天)。无法证明持续时间和用药量之间存在明显差异:与标准外周静脉导管相比,该导管的最长停留时间更长,因此特别适用于超过 7 天的静脉治疗或外周静脉状况不佳的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical evaluation of the PowerGlide Pro midline catheter- dwell time, complications and outcomes for various medications including prostaglandins.

Purpose: The PowerGlide Pro™ Midline Catheter is a peripheral venous access device with a length of 8-10 cm, allowing the tip to reach far into the venous system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dwell time of the catheter. Secondary endpoints included suitability for specific medications (e.g. prostaglandins) and assessment of complications.

Methods: Between January 2019 and November 2021, 50 patients were included in the study. Data on patient demographics, placement characteristics, complications and reasons for removal, were collected.

Results: Placement was technically successful in 92% (n = 46) of cases. In all cases, veins of the upper extremity were punctured (34 basilic veins, 7 brachial veins, 6 cephalic veins, and 3 median cubital veins). The average dwell time was 6.1 days (1-17 days). A significant difference between duration and medication administered could not be demonstrated.

Conclusions: The longer maximum dwell time compared to a standard peripheral venous catheter makes it particularly suitable for intravenous therapy for more than 7 days or patients who have poor peripheral vein status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Low vs. conventional intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study. Comparative effectiveness totally endoscopic thyroidectomy via completely submental tri-hole approach and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy without insufflation. Curative treatment for oligometastatic gastroesophageal cancer- results of a prospective multicenter study. New purse-string suture clamp and multi-functional seal cap: a simple intracorporeal circular-stapled oesophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. The importance of microvascular invasion in patients with non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1