Evelien Van Roie, Jannique van Uffelen, Christophe Delecluse
{"title":"爬楼梯与器械阻力锻炼提高老年人的肌肉力量:非劣效性试验","authors":"Evelien Van Roie, Jannique van Uffelen, Christophe Delecluse","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Van Roie, E, van Uffelen, J, and Delecluse, C. Stair-climbing versus machine-based resistance exercise to improve muscle power among older adults: a non-inferiority trial. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Machine-based resistance training (RT) can reduce the age-related loss in muscle power (Pmax). However, weight-bearing exercises have greater potential for implementation. This study investigated whether stair-climbing exercise (STAIR) was non-inferior to improve Pmax compared with machine-based RT among older adults. Functional capacity tests were secondary outcomes. Older adults (30♂ and 16♀; 70.9 ± 4.3 years) were randomly assigned to RT or STAIR (n = 23 per group). Supervised laboratory-based training sessions were performed 2 times per week for 12 weeks. In week 1-4, exercises were performed at controlled speed (hypertrophy-oriented; 4 × 12-15 repetitions; 55% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in RT; step-up exercise with height of 30-40 cm in STAIR), in week 5-12 as fast as possible (power-oriented, 4 × 12 repetitions; 40% of 1RM for RT and 4 × 2 flights of 6 steps for STAIR). Leg-extensor Pmax and functional capacity were measured pre-intervention and post-intervention, and Pmax also after 4 weeks of training. Gains in Pmax were not statistically different in RT (19.5 ± 12.2%) and STAIR (13.7 ± 16.5%) (d = 0.39, pint = 0.086), whereas non-inferiority analyses were inconclusive (between-group difference in gains: 5.8% (95% CI -3.1 to 14.6); non-inferiority limit 3.9%). STAIR increased more in stair ascent performance (d = 0.45-0.61, pint < 0.05) than RT. STAIR and RT improved similarly on 10-m fast walk, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, and countermovement jump (pint > 0.05). To conclude, STAIR and RT both induced significant changes in Pmax and functional capacity in older adults. STAIR was beneficial over RT for gains in stair-climbing performance. Future research should investigate the effects of STAIR in a home-based unsupervised setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stair-Climbing Versus Machine-Based Resistance Exercise to Improve Muscle Power Among Older Adults: A Noninferiority Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Evelien Van Roie, Jannique van Uffelen, Christophe Delecluse\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Van Roie, E, van Uffelen, J, and Delecluse, C. Stair-climbing versus machine-based resistance exercise to improve muscle power among older adults: a non-inferiority trial. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Machine-based resistance training (RT) can reduce the age-related loss in muscle power (Pmax). However, weight-bearing exercises have greater potential for implementation. This study investigated whether stair-climbing exercise (STAIR) was non-inferior to improve Pmax compared with machine-based RT among older adults. Functional capacity tests were secondary outcomes. Older adults (30♂ and 16♀; 70.9 ± 4.3 years) were randomly assigned to RT or STAIR (n = 23 per group). Supervised laboratory-based training sessions were performed 2 times per week for 12 weeks. In week 1-4, exercises were performed at controlled speed (hypertrophy-oriented; 4 × 12-15 repetitions; 55% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in RT; step-up exercise with height of 30-40 cm in STAIR), in week 5-12 as fast as possible (power-oriented, 4 × 12 repetitions; 40% of 1RM for RT and 4 × 2 flights of 6 steps for STAIR). Leg-extensor Pmax and functional capacity were measured pre-intervention and post-intervention, and Pmax also after 4 weeks of training. Gains in Pmax were not statistically different in RT (19.5 ± 12.2%) and STAIR (13.7 ± 16.5%) (d = 0.39, pint = 0.086), whereas non-inferiority analyses were inconclusive (between-group difference in gains: 5.8% (95% CI -3.1 to 14.6); non-inferiority limit 3.9%). STAIR increased more in stair ascent performance (d = 0.45-0.61, pint < 0.05) than RT. STAIR and RT improved similarly on 10-m fast walk, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, and countermovement jump (pint > 0.05). To conclude, STAIR and RT both induced significant changes in Pmax and functional capacity in older adults. STAIR was beneficial over RT for gains in stair-climbing performance. Future research should investigate the effects of STAIR in a home-based unsupervised setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Abstract: Van Roie, E, van Uffelen, J, and Delecluse, C. Stair-climbing versus machine-based resistance exercise to improve muscle power among older adults: a non-inferiority trial.J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-机器阻力训练(RT)可减少与年龄有关的肌肉力量(Pmax)损失。然而,负重练习具有更大的实施潜力。本研究调查了与机器阻力训练相比,爬楼梯运动(STAIR)在改善老年人最大肌力方面是否无劣势。功能能力测试是次要结果。老年人(30♂岁和16♀岁;70.9±4.3岁)被随机分配到RT或STAIR(每组23人)。在实验室指导下进行训练,每周2次,为期12周。在第 1-4 周,训练以可控速度进行(以肥大为导向;4 × 12-15 次重复;RT 为 1 次最大重量(1RM)的 55%;STAIR 为高度为 30-40 厘米的台阶练习);在第 5-12 周,尽可能快地进行(以力量为导向,4 × 12 次重复;RT 为 1RM 的 40%,STAIR 为 4 × 2 飞行 6 个台阶)。在干预前和干预后测量了腿部伸肌最大限度和功能能力,并在训练 4 周后测量了最大限度。RT(19.5 ± 12.2%)和 STAIR(13.7 ± 16.5%)的 Pmax 增幅在统计学上没有差异(d = 0.39,pint = 0.086),而非劣效性分析则没有结论(组间增幅差异为 5.8% (95% CI = 0.5%)):5.8%(95% CI -3.1-14.6);非劣效限制为 3.9%)。与 RT 相比,STAIR 在爬楼梯能力方面的提高幅度更大(d = 0.45-0.61,pint < 0.05)。STAIR 和 RT 在 10 米快走、5 次重复坐立和反向运动跳跃方面的提高相似(pint > 0.05)。总之,STAIR 和 RT 都能使老年人的最大负重和功能能力发生显著变化。在提高爬楼梯能力方面,STAIR 比 RT 更有优势。未来的研究应调查 STAIR 在家庭无监督环境下的效果。
Stair-Climbing Versus Machine-Based Resistance Exercise to Improve Muscle Power Among Older Adults: A Noninferiority Trial.
Abstract: Van Roie, E, van Uffelen, J, and Delecluse, C. Stair-climbing versus machine-based resistance exercise to improve muscle power among older adults: a non-inferiority trial. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Machine-based resistance training (RT) can reduce the age-related loss in muscle power (Pmax). However, weight-bearing exercises have greater potential for implementation. This study investigated whether stair-climbing exercise (STAIR) was non-inferior to improve Pmax compared with machine-based RT among older adults. Functional capacity tests were secondary outcomes. Older adults (30♂ and 16♀; 70.9 ± 4.3 years) were randomly assigned to RT or STAIR (n = 23 per group). Supervised laboratory-based training sessions were performed 2 times per week for 12 weeks. In week 1-4, exercises were performed at controlled speed (hypertrophy-oriented; 4 × 12-15 repetitions; 55% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in RT; step-up exercise with height of 30-40 cm in STAIR), in week 5-12 as fast as possible (power-oriented, 4 × 12 repetitions; 40% of 1RM for RT and 4 × 2 flights of 6 steps for STAIR). Leg-extensor Pmax and functional capacity were measured pre-intervention and post-intervention, and Pmax also after 4 weeks of training. Gains in Pmax were not statistically different in RT (19.5 ± 12.2%) and STAIR (13.7 ± 16.5%) (d = 0.39, pint = 0.086), whereas non-inferiority analyses were inconclusive (between-group difference in gains: 5.8% (95% CI -3.1 to 14.6); non-inferiority limit 3.9%). STAIR increased more in stair ascent performance (d = 0.45-0.61, pint < 0.05) than RT. STAIR and RT improved similarly on 10-m fast walk, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, and countermovement jump (pint > 0.05). To conclude, STAIR and RT both induced significant changes in Pmax and functional capacity in older adults. STAIR was beneficial over RT for gains in stair-climbing performance. Future research should investigate the effects of STAIR in a home-based unsupervised setting.
期刊介绍:
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.