{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂标签外处方中的社会经济和人口不平等--一项瑞典描述性队列研究。","authors":"Laura Pazzagli, Ylva Trolle Lagerros","doi":"10.1159/000542682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction In Sweden, glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are subsidized for diabetes indication but not for obesity. Unregulated off-label prescription of GLP-1 receptor agonists for obesity treatment may raise concerns about potential inequalities for both patient groups. This study aims to describe socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of on- and off-label users of GLP-1 receptor agonists in persons without a diagnosis of diabetes. Methods Swedish descriptive register-based cohort study of persons who filled a prescription of a GLP-1 receptor agonist at least once during 2018-2022. Individuals were excluded from the study population if they had a diagnosis of diabetes or previous prescription fills of insulin/analogs at any time prior to the first filled prescription of a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics were described overall and stratified by sex and prior use of anti-obesity medications. Off-label use was defined by filled prescriptions of GLP-1 receptor agonists which are indicated for diabetes treatment. Results The study population included 16,436 individuals, of which 70.1% were women, 30.7% had previously filled a prescription of anti-obesity medications, 65.3% had Sweden as country of origin and 17.2% an Asian country. In the analyses stratified by sex women were more likely to have an education longer than 9 years (84.8% vs 78.3% in men). Nonetheless, women had lower annual individual (2891.3 vs 4004.9 in men) and family disposable income (5645.5 vs 6092.5 in men). Overall, on-label prescription was higher in women (49.2% vs 30.9% in men), while off-label was more common among men (69% vs 51% in women). Conclusion High family disposable income, and male sex are common among off-label glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist users compared to users of the only on-label glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in Sweden. Regional differences indicate different clinical practices and guideline interpretations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic and demographic inequalities in off-label prescription of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists - a Swedish descriptive cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Pazzagli, Ylva Trolle Lagerros\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction In Sweden, glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are subsidized for diabetes indication but not for obesity. Unregulated off-label prescription of GLP-1 receptor agonists for obesity treatment may raise concerns about potential inequalities for both patient groups. This study aims to describe socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of on- and off-label users of GLP-1 receptor agonists in persons without a diagnosis of diabetes. Methods Swedish descriptive register-based cohort study of persons who filled a prescription of a GLP-1 receptor agonist at least once during 2018-2022. Individuals were excluded from the study population if they had a diagnosis of diabetes or previous prescription fills of insulin/analogs at any time prior to the first filled prescription of a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics were described overall and stratified by sex and prior use of anti-obesity medications. Off-label use was defined by filled prescriptions of GLP-1 receptor agonists which are indicated for diabetes treatment. Results The study population included 16,436 individuals, of which 70.1% were women, 30.7% had previously filled a prescription of anti-obesity medications, 65.3% had Sweden as country of origin and 17.2% an Asian country. In the analyses stratified by sex women were more likely to have an education longer than 9 years (84.8% vs 78.3% in men). Nonetheless, women had lower annual individual (2891.3 vs 4004.9 in men) and family disposable income (5645.5 vs 6092.5 in men). Overall, on-label prescription was higher in women (49.2% vs 30.9% in men), while off-label was more common among men (69% vs 51% in women). Conclusion High family disposable income, and male sex are common among off-label glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist users compared to users of the only on-label glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in Sweden. Regional differences indicate different clinical practices and guideline interpretations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Facts\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Facts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542682\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socioeconomic and demographic inequalities in off-label prescription of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists - a Swedish descriptive cohort study.
Introduction In Sweden, glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are subsidized for diabetes indication but not for obesity. Unregulated off-label prescription of GLP-1 receptor agonists for obesity treatment may raise concerns about potential inequalities for both patient groups. This study aims to describe socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of on- and off-label users of GLP-1 receptor agonists in persons without a diagnosis of diabetes. Methods Swedish descriptive register-based cohort study of persons who filled a prescription of a GLP-1 receptor agonist at least once during 2018-2022. Individuals were excluded from the study population if they had a diagnosis of diabetes or previous prescription fills of insulin/analogs at any time prior to the first filled prescription of a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics were described overall and stratified by sex and prior use of anti-obesity medications. Off-label use was defined by filled prescriptions of GLP-1 receptor agonists which are indicated for diabetes treatment. Results The study population included 16,436 individuals, of which 70.1% were women, 30.7% had previously filled a prescription of anti-obesity medications, 65.3% had Sweden as country of origin and 17.2% an Asian country. In the analyses stratified by sex women were more likely to have an education longer than 9 years (84.8% vs 78.3% in men). Nonetheless, women had lower annual individual (2891.3 vs 4004.9 in men) and family disposable income (5645.5 vs 6092.5 in men). Overall, on-label prescription was higher in women (49.2% vs 30.9% in men), while off-label was more common among men (69% vs 51% in women). Conclusion High family disposable income, and male sex are common among off-label glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist users compared to users of the only on-label glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in Sweden. Regional differences indicate different clinical practices and guideline interpretations.
期刊介绍:
''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.