南印度眼科保健服务的使用情况:使用理论领域框架对自我报告的障碍进行回顾性分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/opo.13424
Vijay Kumar Yelagondula, Srinivas Marmamula, Rajashekar Varada, Ahalya Subramanian, John G Lawrenson
{"title":"南印度眼科保健服务的使用情况:使用理论领域框架对自我报告的障碍进行回顾性分析。","authors":"Vijay Kumar Yelagondula, Srinivas Marmamula, Rajashekar Varada, Ahalya Subramanian, John G Lawrenson","doi":"10.1111/opo.13424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding barriers to seeking eye care and providing evidence-based theory-informed solutions can improve the uptake of eye care services. Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we aim to report and analyse barriers to seeking eye care services among individuals with vision impairment in the Akividu region of Andhra Pradesh, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Out of the 3000 enumerated participants, a total of 2587 were examined. All participants with vision impairment were asked to report barriers for not seeking eye care despite noticing reduced vision using a validated questionnaire. The reported barriers were mapped to the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to explore potential individual and environmental influences on the uptake of eye care services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to seeking eye care services are most frequently mapped to the 'beliefs about capabilities', 'environmental context and resources' and 'social influences' domains of the TDF. The most frequently reported barrier was 'aware of the problem but can manage' (beliefs about capabilities), expressed by 43.4% (n = 156) and 55.7% (n = 337) of participants with distance and near vision impairment, respectively. 'No one to accompany' for an appointment (social influences) was a significant barrier for participants with distance vision impairment (n = 44, 12.2%) in comparison to participants with near vision impairment (n = 19, 3.1%). Additionally, fear of losing eyesight or operation or consultation (emotion) was a major deterrent for seeking eye care services, particularly among participants with distance vision impairment (n = 31, 8.6%) when compared with near vision impairment (n = 17, 2.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The uptake of eye care services is influenced by a complex set of interacting factors. Identification of potentially modifiable target behaviours provides an opportunity to develop theory-informed solutions to improve uptake of services and prevent avoidable vision loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake of eye care services in South India: Retrospective mapping of self-reported barriers using the Theoretical Domains Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Vijay Kumar Yelagondula, Srinivas Marmamula, Rajashekar Varada, Ahalya Subramanian, John G Lawrenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding barriers to seeking eye care and providing evidence-based theory-informed solutions can improve the uptake of eye care services. Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we aim to report and analyse barriers to seeking eye care services among individuals with vision impairment in the Akividu region of Andhra Pradesh, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Out of the 3000 enumerated participants, a total of 2587 were examined. All participants with vision impairment were asked to report barriers for not seeking eye care despite noticing reduced vision using a validated questionnaire. The reported barriers were mapped to the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to explore potential individual and environmental influences on the uptake of eye care services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to seeking eye care services are most frequently mapped to the 'beliefs about capabilities', 'environmental context and resources' and 'social influences' domains of the TDF. The most frequently reported barrier was 'aware of the problem but can manage' (beliefs about capabilities), expressed by 43.4% (n = 156) and 55.7% (n = 337) of participants with distance and near vision impairment, respectively. 'No one to accompany' for an appointment (social influences) was a significant barrier for participants with distance vision impairment (n = 44, 12.2%) in comparison to participants with near vision impairment (n = 19, 3.1%). Additionally, fear of losing eyesight or operation or consultation (emotion) was a major deterrent for seeking eye care services, particularly among participants with distance vision impairment (n = 31, 8.6%) when compared with near vision impairment (n = 17, 2.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The uptake of eye care services is influenced by a complex set of interacting factors. Identification of potentially modifiable target behaviours provides an opportunity to develop theory-informed solutions to improve uptake of services and prevent avoidable vision loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13424\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:了解寻求眼科保健服务的障碍并提供以证据为基础、以理论为依据的解决方案,可以提高眼科保健服务的利用率。因此,在这项横断面研究中,我们旨在报告和分析印度安得拉邦 Akividu 地区视力受损者寻求眼科保健服务的障碍:方法:在 3000 名统计参与者中,共有 2587 人接受了检查。所有有视力障碍的参与者都被要求使用一份有效的调查问卷来报告在发现视力下降的情况下仍不寻求眼科治疗的障碍。所报告的障碍被映射到理论领域框架(TDF)中,以探讨个人和环境对接受眼科保健服务的潜在影响:结果:寻求眼科保健服务的障碍最常与 TDF 的 "能力信念"、"环境背景和资源 "以及 "社会影响 "领域相联系。最常见的障碍是 "意识到问题但可以处理"(对能力的信念),分别有 43.4%(n = 156)和 55.7%(n = 337)的远视力和近视力受损的参与者表达了这一信念。没有人陪同"(社会影响)是远视力障碍参与者(44 人,12.2%)与近视力障碍参与者(19 人,3.1%)相比面临的主要障碍。此外,害怕失去视力、手术或就诊(情绪)也是阻碍人们寻求眼科保健服务的主要因素,尤其是远视力受损的参与者(31 人,8.6%),而近视力受损的参与者(17 人,2.8%):接受眼科保健服务受到一系列复杂的相互作用因素的影响。识别潜在的可改变的目标行为为制定有理论依据的解决方案提供了机会,从而提高服务的使用率并预防可避免的视力损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uptake of eye care services in South India: Retrospective mapping of self-reported barriers using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Introduction: Understanding barriers to seeking eye care and providing evidence-based theory-informed solutions can improve the uptake of eye care services. Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we aim to report and analyse barriers to seeking eye care services among individuals with vision impairment in the Akividu region of Andhra Pradesh, India.

Methods: Out of the 3000 enumerated participants, a total of 2587 were examined. All participants with vision impairment were asked to report barriers for not seeking eye care despite noticing reduced vision using a validated questionnaire. The reported barriers were mapped to the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to explore potential individual and environmental influences on the uptake of eye care services.

Results: Barriers to seeking eye care services are most frequently mapped to the 'beliefs about capabilities', 'environmental context and resources' and 'social influences' domains of the TDF. The most frequently reported barrier was 'aware of the problem but can manage' (beliefs about capabilities), expressed by 43.4% (n = 156) and 55.7% (n = 337) of participants with distance and near vision impairment, respectively. 'No one to accompany' for an appointment (social influences) was a significant barrier for participants with distance vision impairment (n = 44, 12.2%) in comparison to participants with near vision impairment (n = 19, 3.1%). Additionally, fear of losing eyesight or operation or consultation (emotion) was a major deterrent for seeking eye care services, particularly among participants with distance vision impairment (n = 31, 8.6%) when compared with near vision impairment (n = 17, 2.8%).

Conclusion: The uptake of eye care services is influenced by a complex set of interacting factors. Identification of potentially modifiable target behaviours provides an opportunity to develop theory-informed solutions to improve uptake of services and prevent avoidable vision loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with myopia in the Portuguese child population: An epidemiological study. Mechanism of optical treatments for myopia: Are lenslets joining the DOTs? Uptake of eye care services in South India: Retrospective mapping of self-reported barriers using the Theoretical Domains Framework. One hundred years and counting. Extracting full information from OCT scans-signs of early age-related macular degeneration within inner retinal layers by local neighbourhood statistics. Part I: Methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1