肾脏消除药物使用的挑战:评估胱抑素 C 和血清肌酐 eGFR 的不一致性。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1002/phar.4627
Brandy N Hernandez, Patrick M Wieruszewski, Jason N Barreto, Kristin C Cole, Shivam Damani, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Kianoush B Kashani, Ellen Kelly, Andrew D Rule, Hilary R Teaford, Jaleh Zand, Erin F Barreto
{"title":"肾脏消除药物使用的挑战:评估胱抑素 C 和血清肌酐 eGFR 的不一致性。","authors":"Brandy N Hernandez, Patrick M Wieruszewski, Jason N Barreto, Kristin C Cole, Shivam Damani, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Kianoush B Kashani, Ellen Kelly, Andrew D Rule, Hilary R Teaford, Jaleh Zand, Erin F Barreto","doi":"10.1002/phar.4627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for dosing medications in hospitalized patients. Due to limitations of serum creatinine for GFR estimation, serum cystatin C (CysC) has been explored as an alternative functional kidney biomarker. This study assessed discordance between eGFR<sub>Cr</sub> and eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> in a large sample of hospitalized patients and examined the frequency of renally eliminated medications affected by eGFR discordance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multisite historical study included adults hospitalized between 2011 and 2023 with CysC and serum creatinine reported within 24 h of each other. The first concurrent biomarker pair for each patient was analyzed. eGFR discordance and use of renally eliminated medications were described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17,718 hospitalized patients with concurrent creatinine and CysC assessments were included. The median eGFR<sub>Cr</sub> was 65 mL/min, and the eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> was 46 mL/min. The median absolute difference of eGFR<sub>Cr</sub>-eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> was 15 mL/min, and 7972 patients (45%) had a > 30% absolute difference. There was a significantly greater percentage of patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min based on eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> (26%) compared to eGFR<sub>Cr</sub> (15%) (p < 0.001). Patients were prescribed an average of 20 medications in the 24 h surrounding the concurrent biomarker assessment. Renally eliminated medications accounted for 39% ± 13% of medication orders, and 80% of patients with eGFR discordance were prescribed five or more renally eliminated medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial eGFR discordance between eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> and eGFR<sub>Cr</sub> was observed in hospitalized patients, which directly affects the dosing of renally eliminated medications. Further research is needed to optimize the pharmacotherapy of renally eliminated medications with discordant GFR assessments to improve medication safety and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in renally eliminated medication use: Evaluating cystatin C and serum creatinine eGFR discordance.\",\"authors\":\"Brandy N Hernandez, Patrick M Wieruszewski, Jason N Barreto, Kristin C Cole, Shivam Damani, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Kianoush B Kashani, Ellen Kelly, Andrew D Rule, Hilary R Teaford, Jaleh Zand, Erin F Barreto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/phar.4627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for dosing medications in hospitalized patients. Due to limitations of serum creatinine for GFR estimation, serum cystatin C (CysC) has been explored as an alternative functional kidney biomarker. This study assessed discordance between eGFR<sub>Cr</sub> and eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> in a large sample of hospitalized patients and examined the frequency of renally eliminated medications affected by eGFR discordance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multisite historical study included adults hospitalized between 2011 and 2023 with CysC and serum creatinine reported within 24 h of each other. The first concurrent biomarker pair for each patient was analyzed. eGFR discordance and use of renally eliminated medications were described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17,718 hospitalized patients with concurrent creatinine and CysC assessments were included. The median eGFR<sub>Cr</sub> was 65 mL/min, and the eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> was 46 mL/min. The median absolute difference of eGFR<sub>Cr</sub>-eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> was 15 mL/min, and 7972 patients (45%) had a > 30% absolute difference. There was a significantly greater percentage of patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min based on eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> (26%) compared to eGFR<sub>Cr</sub> (15%) (p < 0.001). Patients were prescribed an average of 20 medications in the 24 h surrounding the concurrent biomarker assessment. Renally eliminated medications accounted for 39% ± 13% of medication orders, and 80% of patients with eGFR discordance were prescribed five or more renally eliminated medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial eGFR discordance between eGFR<sub>CysC</sub> and eGFR<sub>Cr</sub> was observed in hospitalized patients, which directly affects the dosing of renally eliminated medications. Further research is needed to optimize the pharmacotherapy of renally eliminated medications with discordant GFR assessments to improve medication safety and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4627\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确估计肾小球滤过率(GFR)对住院患者的用药剂量至关重要。由于血清肌酐在估算肾小球滤过率方面的局限性,血清胱抑素 C(CysC)已被视为替代性肾功能生物标记物。本研究评估了大量住院患者样本中 eGFRCr 和 eGFRCysC 之间的不一致性,并研究了受 eGFR 不一致性影响的肾脏排出药物的频率:这项多站点历史研究纳入了 2011 年至 2023 年期间住院的成年人,他们的 CysC 和血清肌酐报告时间相差 24 小时。对每位患者的第一对并发生物标志物进行分析,并描述了 eGFR 不一致情况和肾脏排毒药物的使用情况:结果:共纳入了 17,718 名同时接受肌酐和 CysC 评估的住院患者。中位 eGFRCr 为 65 毫升/分钟,eGFRCysC 为 46 毫升/分钟。eGFRCr-eGFRCysC 的绝对差异中位数为 15 毫升/分钟,7972 名患者(45%)的绝对差异大于 30%。与 eGFRCr(15%)相比,eGFR CysC(26%)患者的比例明显更高(p 结论:eGFR CysC 与 eGFRCr 的绝对差异很大:在住院患者中观察到 eGFRCysC 和 eGFRCr 之间存在严重的 eGFR 不一致,这直接影响了肾脏排出药物的剂量。需要进一步开展研究,以优化肾脏排泄药物与不一致的 GFR 评估之间的药物治疗,从而提高药物的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges in renally eliminated medication use: Evaluating cystatin C and serum creatinine eGFR discordance.

Background: Accurately estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for dosing medications in hospitalized patients. Due to limitations of serum creatinine for GFR estimation, serum cystatin C (CysC) has been explored as an alternative functional kidney biomarker. This study assessed discordance between eGFRCr and eGFRCysC in a large sample of hospitalized patients and examined the frequency of renally eliminated medications affected by eGFR discordance.

Methods: This multisite historical study included adults hospitalized between 2011 and 2023 with CysC and serum creatinine reported within 24 h of each other. The first concurrent biomarker pair for each patient was analyzed. eGFR discordance and use of renally eliminated medications were described.

Results: 17,718 hospitalized patients with concurrent creatinine and CysC assessments were included. The median eGFRCr was 65 mL/min, and the eGFRCysC was 46 mL/min. The median absolute difference of eGFRCr-eGFRCysC was 15 mL/min, and 7972 patients (45%) had a > 30% absolute difference. There was a significantly greater percentage of patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min based on eGFRCysC (26%) compared to eGFRCr (15%) (p < 0.001). Patients were prescribed an average of 20 medications in the 24 h surrounding the concurrent biomarker assessment. Renally eliminated medications accounted for 39% ± 13% of medication orders, and 80% of patients with eGFR discordance were prescribed five or more renally eliminated medications.

Conclusion: Substantial eGFR discordance between eGFRCysC and eGFRCr was observed in hospitalized patients, which directly affects the dosing of renally eliminated medications. Further research is needed to optimize the pharmacotherapy of renally eliminated medications with discordant GFR assessments to improve medication safety and effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Aztreonam-avibactam: The dynamic duo against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. Challenges in renally eliminated medication use: Evaluating cystatin C and serum creatinine eGFR discordance. Utilization and associated factors of TPMT testing among Australian adults receiving thiopurines: A national retrospective data-linkage study. Association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and kidney harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Precision medicine to identify, prevent, and treat pediatric obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1