Benjamin F Giertych, Adam E Klein, Matthew J Dietz, Brock A Lindsey, Benjamin M Frye
{"title":"机械臂辅助全髋关节置换术:提高髋臼组件的准确性和患者报告的结果指标。","authors":"Benjamin F Giertych, Adam E Klein, Matthew J Dietz, Brock A Lindsey, Benjamin M Frye","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acetabular component placement is critical for total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability and clinical outcomes. We investigated cup placement with robotic-arm assisted (RA) and conventional manual (CM) THA and compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and dislocations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-seven patients were randomized to undergo RA or CM primary THA. Computed tomography scans were completed preoperatively and at three months. Component version and inclination were analyzed with target anteversion of 20° and inclination of 40°. PROMs were collected to assess early clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen RA and 20 CM THAs were performed. Overall, 1/17 RA and 8/20 CM components fell outside the Lewinnek safe zone. No RA components fell outside the safe zone for inclination and one did for version. Three CM components were outside the inclination safe zone and six were outside for version. There were no dislocations in either group. Improvements in all Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) subtype scores reached substantial clinical benefit thresholds in both groups. One-year HOOS symptom and sports score improvements were significantly higher in the RA group. PROMIS-10 mental health improvement was significantly higher in the CM group at six months, but not at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-arm assistance may result in more consistent placement within the Lewinnek safe zone. There were improvements in PROMs in both groups, but there were different effects on individual PROMS between groups. Further study is necessary to determine the clinical significance of these improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":"45 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic-Arm Assisted THA: Improved Acetabular Component Accuracy and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin F Giertych, Adam E Klein, Matthew J Dietz, Brock A Lindsey, Benjamin M Frye\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acetabular component placement is critical for total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability and clinical outcomes. We investigated cup placement with robotic-arm assisted (RA) and conventional manual (CM) THA and compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and dislocations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-seven patients were randomized to undergo RA or CM primary THA. Computed tomography scans were completed preoperatively and at three months. Component version and inclination were analyzed with target anteversion of 20° and inclination of 40°. PROMs were collected to assess early clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen RA and 20 CM THAs were performed. Overall, 1/17 RA and 8/20 CM components fell outside the Lewinnek safe zone. No RA components fell outside the safe zone for inclination and one did for version. Three CM components were outside the inclination safe zone and six were outside for version. There were no dislocations in either group. Improvements in all Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) subtype scores reached substantial clinical benefit thresholds in both groups. One-year HOOS symptom and sports score improvements were significantly higher in the RA group. PROMIS-10 mental health improvement was significantly higher in the CM group at six months, but not at one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-arm assistance may result in more consistent placement within the Lewinnek safe zone. There were improvements in PROMs in both groups, but there were different effects on individual PROMS between groups. Further study is necessary to determine the clinical significance of these improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical technology international\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical technology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:髋臼组件置放对全髋关节置换术(THA)的稳定性和临床效果至关重要。我们研究了机器人臂辅助(RA)和传统人工(CM)THA的髋臼杯置入,并比较了患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和脱位情况:37名患者随机接受RA或CM初级THA手术。术前和三个月时完成计算机断层扫描。以20°的目标前倾角和40°的目标后倾角为标准,分析组件的倾斜度。收集PROMs以评估早期临床结果:结果:共进行了 17 例 RA 和 20 例 CM THAs。总体而言,有1/17的RA和8/20的CM组件位于Lewinnek安全区之外。没有RA组件在倾斜度方面超出安全区,有一个组件在版本方面超出安全区。有 3 个 CM 构件超出了倾斜安全区,有 6 个 CM 构件超出了翻转安全区。两组均未发生脱位。两组患者的所有髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分(HOOS)亚型评分均有改善,达到了显著的临床获益阈值。RA组一年的HOOS症状和运动评分改善程度明显更高。CM组的PROMIS-10心理健康改善率在6个月时明显高于RA组,但在一年时则没有明显改善:结论:机械臂辅助可能会使Lewinnek安全区内的置放位置更加一致。两组患者的 PROM 均有所改善,但不同组别对个别 PROM 的影响不同。有必要进行进一步研究,以确定这些改善的临床意义。
Introduction: Acetabular component placement is critical for total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability and clinical outcomes. We investigated cup placement with robotic-arm assisted (RA) and conventional manual (CM) THA and compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and dislocations.
Materials and methods: Thirty-seven patients were randomized to undergo RA or CM primary THA. Computed tomography scans were completed preoperatively and at three months. Component version and inclination were analyzed with target anteversion of 20° and inclination of 40°. PROMs were collected to assess early clinical outcomes.
Results: Seventeen RA and 20 CM THAs were performed. Overall, 1/17 RA and 8/20 CM components fell outside the Lewinnek safe zone. No RA components fell outside the safe zone for inclination and one did for version. Three CM components were outside the inclination safe zone and six were outside for version. There were no dislocations in either group. Improvements in all Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) subtype scores reached substantial clinical benefit thresholds in both groups. One-year HOOS symptom and sports score improvements were significantly higher in the RA group. PROMIS-10 mental health improvement was significantly higher in the CM group at six months, but not at one year.
Conclusions: Robotic-arm assistance may result in more consistent placement within the Lewinnek safe zone. There were improvements in PROMs in both groups, but there were different effects on individual PROMS between groups. Further study is necessary to determine the clinical significance of these improvements.