倾斜逆行肾内手术能否提高结石清除率,并为肾结石患者提供更好的手术工效?一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Annals Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_44_24
Arvind Ramachandran, Vivek Meyyappan, Hariharasudhan Sekar, Gayathri Thiruvengadam, Sriram Krishnamoorthy
{"title":"倾斜逆行肾内手术能否提高结石清除率,并为肾结石患者提供更好的手术工效?一项前瞻性随机对照研究。","authors":"Arvind Ramachandran, Vivek Meyyappan, Hariharasudhan Sekar, Gayathri Thiruvengadam, Sriram Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_44_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the standard treatment for renal calculi. Direct visualization and fragmentation are its major advantages. The variable stone clearance rates and the ergonomic challenges faced by urologists are a few limitations. Table tilt enhances stone clearance and improves surgical ergonomics by facilitating better access to stones and reducing procedural strain.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, patients with intrarenal calculi were randomized into standard lithotomy RIRS (S-RIRS) and table-tilted RIRS (T-RIRS) groups. Specified table tilts were suggested for each of the stone locations. The outcomes with regard to stone clearance, operative and lasing time, and ergonomics were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 100 patients were studied, with 50 in each group. The overall operating time and lasing time in the T-RIRS group were less than that in the S-RIRS group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The complication rates were the same in both groups. Most surgeons felt that the surgical ergonomics was better in the T-RIRS group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). When stone-free status was analyzed, seven patients in the S-RIRS group and one in the T-RIRS group had residual stones. The mean Borg category-ratio 10 (CR-10) scores in the S-RIRS and T-RIRS groups were 4.18 and 2.20, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to document the distinct advantages of T-RIRS and its benefits on surgical ergonomics. T-RIRS resulted in significantly shorter operative and lasing times, particularly for stones in lower calyces. Surgical ergonomics, assessed by the Borg CR-10 scale, were significantly better in the T-RIRS group. T-RIRS should become a standard of care for patients undergoing RIRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"16 4","pages":"306-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does tilt-retrograde intrarenal surgery enhance stone clearance and offer better surgical ergonomics in patients with renal calculi? A prospective randomized control study.\",\"authors\":\"Arvind Ramachandran, Vivek Meyyappan, Hariharasudhan Sekar, Gayathri Thiruvengadam, Sriram Krishnamoorthy\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ua.ua_44_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the standard treatment for renal calculi. Direct visualization and fragmentation are its major advantages. The variable stone clearance rates and the ergonomic challenges faced by urologists are a few limitations. Table tilt enhances stone clearance and improves surgical ergonomics by facilitating better access to stones and reducing procedural strain.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, patients with intrarenal calculi were randomized into standard lithotomy RIRS (S-RIRS) and table-tilted RIRS (T-RIRS) groups. Specified table tilts were suggested for each of the stone locations. The outcomes with regard to stone clearance, operative and lasing time, and ergonomics were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 100 patients were studied, with 50 in each group. The overall operating time and lasing time in the T-RIRS group were less than that in the S-RIRS group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The complication rates were the same in both groups. Most surgeons felt that the surgical ergonomics was better in the T-RIRS group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). When stone-free status was analyzed, seven patients in the S-RIRS group and one in the T-RIRS group had residual stones. The mean Borg category-ratio 10 (CR-10) scores in the S-RIRS and T-RIRS groups were 4.18 and 2.20, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to document the distinct advantages of T-RIRS and its benefits on surgical ergonomics. T-RIRS resulted in significantly shorter operative and lasing times, particularly for stones in lower calyces. Surgical ergonomics, assessed by the Borg CR-10 scale, were significantly better in the T-RIRS group. T-RIRS should become a standard of care for patients undergoing RIRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Annals\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"306-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587936/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_44_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_44_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:逆行肾内手术(RIRS)是治疗肾结石的标准方法:逆行肾内手术(RIRS)是治疗肾结石的标准方法。直接观察和碎石是其主要优点。结石清除率不稳定以及泌尿科医生面临的人体工程学挑战是其局限性。倾斜手术台可提高结石清除率,并通过更好地接触结石和减少手术劳损来改善手术工效学:在这项前瞻性研究中,肾内结石患者被随机分为标准碎石RIRS(S-RIRS)组和桌面倾斜RIRS(T-RIRS)组。针对每种结石位置都建议了特定的桌面倾斜度。研究了结石清除、手术和激光时间以及人体工程学方面的结果:研究了约 100 名患者,每组 50 人。T-RIRS 组的总手术时间和激光时间均少于 S-RIRS 组(P < 0.001)。两组的并发症发生率相同。大多数外科医生认为 T-RIRS 组的手术工效更好(P < 0.001)。在分析无结石状态时,S-RIRS 组和 T-RIRS 组分别有 7 名和 1 名患者有残余结石。S-RIRS组和T-RIRS组的博格分类比率10(CR-10)平均得分分别为4.18和2.20(P < 0.001):这是第一项记录 T-RIRS 独特优势及其对手术工效的益处的研究。T-RIRS大大缩短了手术时间和套管时间,尤其是对于下盏结石。根据博格 CR-10 量表评估,T-RIRS 组的手术工效明显更好。T-RIRS 应成为接受 RIRS 的患者的标准护理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does tilt-retrograde intrarenal surgery enhance stone clearance and offer better surgical ergonomics in patients with renal calculi? A prospective randomized control study.

Introduction: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the standard treatment for renal calculi. Direct visualization and fragmentation are its major advantages. The variable stone clearance rates and the ergonomic challenges faced by urologists are a few limitations. Table tilt enhances stone clearance and improves surgical ergonomics by facilitating better access to stones and reducing procedural strain.

Subjects and methods: In this prospective study, patients with intrarenal calculi were randomized into standard lithotomy RIRS (S-RIRS) and table-tilted RIRS (T-RIRS) groups. Specified table tilts were suggested for each of the stone locations. The outcomes with regard to stone clearance, operative and lasing time, and ergonomics were studied.

Results: About 100 patients were studied, with 50 in each group. The overall operating time and lasing time in the T-RIRS group were less than that in the S-RIRS group (P < 0.001). The complication rates were the same in both groups. Most surgeons felt that the surgical ergonomics was better in the T-RIRS group (P < 0.001). When stone-free status was analyzed, seven patients in the S-RIRS group and one in the T-RIRS group had residual stones. The mean Borg category-ratio 10 (CR-10) scores in the S-RIRS and T-RIRS groups were 4.18 and 2.20, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This is the first study to document the distinct advantages of T-RIRS and its benefits on surgical ergonomics. T-RIRS resulted in significantly shorter operative and lasing times, particularly for stones in lower calyces. Surgical ergonomics, assessed by the Borg CR-10 scale, were significantly better in the T-RIRS group. T-RIRS should become a standard of care for patients undergoing RIRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus: Survival and prognostic factors in surgically treated patients. Survival rate comparisons of angioembolization and neoadjuvant targeted therapy on unresectable renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review. Does tilt-retrograde intrarenal surgery enhance stone clearance and offer better surgical ergonomics in patients with renal calculi? A prospective randomized control study. Factor associated with postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer Test. Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery in <1-year age group: A single-center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1