巴西版 "轻松歌唱能力评估--EASE "的验证和临界值。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.015
Bruna Rainho Rocha, Vanessa Veis Ribeiro, Claudia Pacheco, Glaucya Madazio, Elisabeth Amin, Felipe Moreti, Mara Behlau
{"title":"巴西版 \"轻松歌唱能力评估--EASE \"的验证和临界值。","authors":"Bruna Rainho Rocha, Vanessa Veis Ribeiro, Claudia Pacheco, Glaucya Madazio, Elisabeth Amin, Felipe Moreti, Mara Behlau","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE) scale for Brazilian Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 391 singers participated in the study-192 females and 198 males, with a mean age of 33 years. Validation was performed according to the criteria recommended by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, evaluating the following domains, properties, and measurement: reliability (reliability and internal consistency), construct validity (transcultural validity and structural validity), and criterion validity (concurrent criterion validity). Hence, participants responded to the EASE for Brazil (EASE-BR), the Voice Symptoms Scale (VoiSS), the list of signs and symptoms (LSS), and a vocal self-assessment. The EASE-BR was answered a second time 2-15 days after the first application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Brazilian version of the EASE scale, called EASE-BR, was found to have adequate cross-cultural validity. In construct validity, the 22-item, three-factor model had its structure validated in confirmatory factor analysis with an standardized root mean square residual of 0.066; internal consistency with a high Cronbach's coefficient between 0.902 and 0.779; test-retest reliability with an ICC between 0.72 and 0.52; and concurrent criterion validity significantly correlated with the VoiSS, LSS, and vocal self-assessment (P < 0.05). The cutoff values that differentiated individuals with and without risk for voice changes were 10.5 points for the total, 4.5 for vocal fatigue, 5.5 for the vocal risk index, and 1.5 for vocal concern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EASE-BR proved to be a valid and reliable vocal self-assessment instrument in its structure with 22 items and three factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and Cutoff Value of the Brazilian Version of the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily-EASE.\",\"authors\":\"Bruna Rainho Rocha, Vanessa Veis Ribeiro, Claudia Pacheco, Glaucya Madazio, Elisabeth Amin, Felipe Moreti, Mara Behlau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE) scale for Brazilian Portuguese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 391 singers participated in the study-192 females and 198 males, with a mean age of 33 years. Validation was performed according to the criteria recommended by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, evaluating the following domains, properties, and measurement: reliability (reliability and internal consistency), construct validity (transcultural validity and structural validity), and criterion validity (concurrent criterion validity). Hence, participants responded to the EASE for Brazil (EASE-BR), the Voice Symptoms Scale (VoiSS), the list of signs and symptoms (LSS), and a vocal self-assessment. The EASE-BR was answered a second time 2-15 days after the first application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Brazilian version of the EASE scale, called EASE-BR, was found to have adequate cross-cultural validity. In construct validity, the 22-item, three-factor model had its structure validated in confirmatory factor analysis with an standardized root mean square residual of 0.066; internal consistency with a high Cronbach's coefficient between 0.902 and 0.779; test-retest reliability with an ICC between 0.72 and 0.52; and concurrent criterion validity significantly correlated with the VoiSS, LSS, and vocal self-assessment (P < 0.05). The cutoff values that differentiated individuals with and without risk for voice changes were 10.5 points for the total, 4.5 for vocal fatigue, 5.5 for the vocal risk index, and 1.5 for vocal concern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EASE-BR proved to be a valid and reliable vocal self-assessment instrument in its structure with 22 items and three factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.11.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的验证巴西葡萄牙语歌唱能力评估量表(EASE):共有 391 名歌手参加了研究,其中女性 192 人,男性 198 人,平均年龄 33 岁。根据《基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准》推荐的标准进行了验证,对以下领域、属性和测量进行了评估:可靠性(可靠性和内部一致性)、构造效度(跨文化效度和结构效度)和标准效度(并行标准效度)。因此,参与者回答了巴西 EASE(EASE-BR)、嗓音症状量表(VoiSS)、体征和症状清单(LSS)以及嗓音自我评估。EASE-BR 在第一次使用 2-15 天后进行第二次测试:巴西版 EASE 量表(EASE-BR)具有充分的跨文化效度。在建构效度方面,22 个项目的三因素模型的结构在确证因素分析中得到了验证,其标准化均方根残差为 0.066;内部一致性方面,Cronbach's 系数在 0.902 和 0.779 之间,具有较高的一致性;测试-再测信度方面,ICC 在 0.72 和 0.52 之间;并发标准效度方面,与 VoiSS、LSS 和声乐自我评估(P 结论)有显著的相关性:事实证明,EASE-BR 是一种有效、可靠的声乐自评工具,其结构包括 22 个项目和三个因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation and Cutoff Value of the Brazilian Version of the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily-EASE.

Objective: To validate the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE) scale for Brazilian Portuguese.

Methods: A total of 391 singers participated in the study-192 females and 198 males, with a mean age of 33 years. Validation was performed according to the criteria recommended by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments, evaluating the following domains, properties, and measurement: reliability (reliability and internal consistency), construct validity (transcultural validity and structural validity), and criterion validity (concurrent criterion validity). Hence, participants responded to the EASE for Brazil (EASE-BR), the Voice Symptoms Scale (VoiSS), the list of signs and symptoms (LSS), and a vocal self-assessment. The EASE-BR was answered a second time 2-15 days after the first application.

Results: The Brazilian version of the EASE scale, called EASE-BR, was found to have adequate cross-cultural validity. In construct validity, the 22-item, three-factor model had its structure validated in confirmatory factor analysis with an standardized root mean square residual of 0.066; internal consistency with a high Cronbach's coefficient between 0.902 and 0.779; test-retest reliability with an ICC between 0.72 and 0.52; and concurrent criterion validity significantly correlated with the VoiSS, LSS, and vocal self-assessment (P < 0.05). The cutoff values that differentiated individuals with and without risk for voice changes were 10.5 points for the total, 4.5 for vocal fatigue, 5.5 for the vocal risk index, and 1.5 for vocal concern.

Conclusions: The EASE-BR proved to be a valid and reliable vocal self-assessment instrument in its structure with 22 items and three factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Optimal Brain Targets for Enhancing Vocal Performance With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. A Multidiscipline Practitioner Pilot Study Into the Potential Professionalization of Singing Voice Rehabilitation Specialists in the United Kingdom. Characterizing Vocal Hyperfunction Using Ecological Momentary Assessment of Relative Fundamental Frequency. Evaluation of Depression and Perceived Voice Handicap Through Self-Report in Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease. Vocal Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease Classification Using Audio Spectrogram Transformers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1