颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘关节成形术治疗颈椎间盘退行性病变、根性病变和脊髓病的疗效:系统回顾。

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.74418
Fakhri Awawdeh, Ali Salam, Varun Soti
{"title":"颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘关节成形术治疗颈椎间盘退行性病变、根性病变和脊髓病的疗效:系统回顾。","authors":"Fakhri Awawdeh, Ali Salam, Varun Soti","doi":"10.7759/cureus.74418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a condition in which the discs in the neck deteriorate, causing symptoms including neck and arm pain, muscle weakness, and incoordination. In severe cases, it can lead to nerve and spinal cord compression, resulting in radiculopathy and myelopathy. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of two surgical treatments, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), for addressing cervical DDD, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed and BioMed Central databases, from January to March 2024. Thirty-one studies were included, comparing the outcomes of ACDF and CDA in patients with cervical DDD, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Data were analyzed to evaluate outcomes such as the Neck Disability Index (NDI), pain levels, neurological status, incidence of secondary surgeries, range of motion (ROM) maintenance, and occurrence of adjacent segment disease. CDA demonstrated comparable or superior clinical success to ACDF. Both the techniques showed similar improvements in NDI, pain levels, and neurological status during medium- and long-term follow-ups. CDA had lower rates of secondary surgeries and adverse events related to surgery or implants compared to ACDF. It also demonstrated a lower incidence of adjacent segment disease and better ROM preservation. The evidence supports CDA as a safe and effective alternative to ACDF for patients with cervical DDD, particularly those who may benefit from motion preservation. However, further long-term, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to provide more definitive guidance for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"16 11","pages":"e74418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease, Radiculopathy, and Myelopathy: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Fakhri Awawdeh, Ali Salam, Varun Soti\",\"doi\":\"10.7759/cureus.74418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a condition in which the discs in the neck deteriorate, causing symptoms including neck and arm pain, muscle weakness, and incoordination. In severe cases, it can lead to nerve and spinal cord compression, resulting in radiculopathy and myelopathy. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of two surgical treatments, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), for addressing cervical DDD, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed and BioMed Central databases, from January to March 2024. Thirty-one studies were included, comparing the outcomes of ACDF and CDA in patients with cervical DDD, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Data were analyzed to evaluate outcomes such as the Neck Disability Index (NDI), pain levels, neurological status, incidence of secondary surgeries, range of motion (ROM) maintenance, and occurrence of adjacent segment disease. CDA demonstrated comparable or superior clinical success to ACDF. Both the techniques showed similar improvements in NDI, pain levels, and neurological status during medium- and long-term follow-ups. CDA had lower rates of secondary surgeries and adverse events related to surgery or implants compared to ACDF. It also demonstrated a lower incidence of adjacent segment disease and better ROM preservation. The evidence supports CDA as a safe and effective alternative to ACDF for patients with cervical DDD, particularly those who may benefit from motion preservation. However, further long-term, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to provide more definitive guidance for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cureus\",\"volume\":\"16 11\",\"pages\":\"e74418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590168/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cureus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈椎间盘退行性病变(DDD)是指颈部椎间盘退化,引起颈部和手臂疼痛、肌肉无力和不协调等症状。严重者可导致神经和脊髓受压,引起神经根病和脊髓病。本综述旨在评估前路颈椎椎间盘切除与融合术(ACDF)和颈椎间盘关节成形术(CDA)这两种手术疗法在治疗颈椎退行性变、根病和脊髓病方面的有效性。根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,研究人员于 2024 年 1 月至 3 月在 PubMed 和 BioMed Central 数据库中进行了文献检索。共纳入 31 项研究,比较了 ACDF 和 CDA 对颈椎 DDD、根病和脊髓病患者的治疗效果。对数据进行了分析,以评估颈部残疾指数(NDI)、疼痛程度、神经状态、二次手术发生率、活动范围(ROM)维持情况以及邻近节段疾病发生率等结果。CDA 的临床成功率与 ACDF 相当或更高。在中长期随访中,两种技术在NDI、疼痛程度和神经状态方面都有相似的改善。与 ACDF 相比,CDA 的二次手术率和与手术或植入物相关的不良事件发生率较低。它还显示出较低的邻近节段疾病发生率和更好的 ROM 保护。有证据表明,对于颈椎DDD患者,尤其是那些可能从运动保护中获益的患者,CDA是一种安全有效的替代ACDF的方法。不过,还需要进一步的长期多中心随机对照试验为临床实践提供更明确的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease, Radiculopathy, and Myelopathy: A Systematic Review.

Cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a condition in which the discs in the neck deteriorate, causing symptoms including neck and arm pain, muscle weakness, and incoordination. In severe cases, it can lead to nerve and spinal cord compression, resulting in radiculopathy and myelopathy. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of two surgical treatments, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), for addressing cervical DDD, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed and BioMed Central databases, from January to March 2024. Thirty-one studies were included, comparing the outcomes of ACDF and CDA in patients with cervical DDD, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Data were analyzed to evaluate outcomes such as the Neck Disability Index (NDI), pain levels, neurological status, incidence of secondary surgeries, range of motion (ROM) maintenance, and occurrence of adjacent segment disease. CDA demonstrated comparable or superior clinical success to ACDF. Both the techniques showed similar improvements in NDI, pain levels, and neurological status during medium- and long-term follow-ups. CDA had lower rates of secondary surgeries and adverse events related to surgery or implants compared to ACDF. It also demonstrated a lower incidence of adjacent segment disease and better ROM preservation. The evidence supports CDA as a safe and effective alternative to ACDF for patients with cervical DDD, particularly those who may benefit from motion preservation. However, further long-term, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to provide more definitive guidance for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Increasing Incidence of Coronary Artery Disease in Younger Men: Case Study of a 39-Year-Old. Retraction: Evaluation of the Efficacy of the HaeNaem Zero Bone Loss Kit in Indirect Sinus Lift Using Osseodensification. The Usefulness of Exosomes in Accelerating Healing and Preventing Complications in Behçet's Disease: A Case Report. Appendicitis Within an Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia Presenting as Acute Testicular Pain: A Case Report. Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease Complicated by Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1