放射外科治疗三叉神经痛的前部选择性定位:一项队列研究

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neurochirurgica Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s00701-024-06365-8
Alperen Sozer, Ozan Yavuz Tufek, Merve Buke Sahin, Mustafa Caglar Sahin, Ozlem Dagli, Alp Ozgun Borcek, Hakan Emmez, Gokhan Kurt, Aydemir Kale, Sukru Aykol, Mesut Emre Yaman
{"title":"放射外科治疗三叉神经痛的前部选择性定位:一项队列研究","authors":"Alperen Sozer,&nbsp;Ozan Yavuz Tufek,&nbsp;Merve Buke Sahin,&nbsp;Mustafa Caglar Sahin,&nbsp;Ozlem Dagli,&nbsp;Alp Ozgun Borcek,&nbsp;Hakan Emmez,&nbsp;Gokhan Kurt,&nbsp;Aydemir Kale,&nbsp;Sukru Aykol,&nbsp;Mesut Emre Yaman","doi":"10.1007/s00701-024-06365-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Before commonly used targets such as the Retrogasserian Zone (RGZ) and the Root Entry Zone (REZ) were adopted for the radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), a more anterior target involving the Gasserian ganglion was used. Thanks to advancements in imaging technology, it is now possible to identify and target separate nerve divisions in Meckel’s Cave as desired. Although this approach has been mentioned previously, no clinical study has investigated it until now. This study aims to fill this gap in the literature.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Trigeminal neuralgia patients who received radiosurgical treatment between February 2019 and June 2022 in a single centre were included in the study. Pain relief, medication dependency and side effect profiles of the investigated anterior selective target (AST) were compared to those of the classical targets at 1 week, 1–3-6 months, and 1 year.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 66 patients were included in the study. Effectiveness, safety and application convenience parameters were compared between; the REZ (<i>n</i> = 21), RGZ (<i>n</i> = 20) and AST (<i>n</i> = 25) groups. All groups showed significant improvement in pain with similar results to each other. AST treatments were performed in significantly shorter beam-on-times and with significantly lower brainstem doses.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The investigated AST showed comparable results to the classical targets without any indication of superiority or inferiority in terms of efficacy and safety in this preliminary investigation. As no blocks were needed to protect the brainstem with this method, it can be used for select patients as needed and could even be investigated in larger studies as an alternative approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anterior selective targeting for radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Alperen Sozer,&nbsp;Ozan Yavuz Tufek,&nbsp;Merve Buke Sahin,&nbsp;Mustafa Caglar Sahin,&nbsp;Ozlem Dagli,&nbsp;Alp Ozgun Borcek,&nbsp;Hakan Emmez,&nbsp;Gokhan Kurt,&nbsp;Aydemir Kale,&nbsp;Sukru Aykol,&nbsp;Mesut Emre Yaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-024-06365-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Before commonly used targets such as the Retrogasserian Zone (RGZ) and the Root Entry Zone (REZ) were adopted for the radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), a more anterior target involving the Gasserian ganglion was used. Thanks to advancements in imaging technology, it is now possible to identify and target separate nerve divisions in Meckel’s Cave as desired. Although this approach has been mentioned previously, no clinical study has investigated it until now. This study aims to fill this gap in the literature.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Trigeminal neuralgia patients who received radiosurgical treatment between February 2019 and June 2022 in a single centre were included in the study. Pain relief, medication dependency and side effect profiles of the investigated anterior selective target (AST) were compared to those of the classical targets at 1 week, 1–3-6 months, and 1 year.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 66 patients were included in the study. Effectiveness, safety and application convenience parameters were compared between; the REZ (<i>n</i> = 21), RGZ (<i>n</i> = 20) and AST (<i>n</i> = 25) groups. All groups showed significant improvement in pain with similar results to each other. AST treatments were performed in significantly shorter beam-on-times and with significantly lower brainstem doses.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The investigated AST showed comparable results to the classical targets without any indication of superiority or inferiority in terms of efficacy and safety in this preliminary investigation. As no blocks were needed to protect the brainstem with this method, it can be used for select patients as needed and could even be investigated in larger studies as an alternative approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-024-06365-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-024-06365-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在三叉神经痛(TN)放射外科治疗采用逆行性神经节区(RGZ)和根入区(REZ)等常用靶点之前,曾使用过涉及 Gasserian 神经节的更前端靶点。由于成像技术的进步,现在可以根据需要识别并瞄准梅克尔洞中的独立神经分支。虽然这种方法以前曾被提及,但直到现在还没有临床研究对此进行过调查。本研究旨在填补这一文献空白。研究方法将 2019 年 2 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在一个中心接受放射外科治疗的三叉神经痛患者纳入研究。将所研究的前部选择性靶点(AST)与经典靶点在 1 周、1-3-6 个月和 1 年的疼痛缓解、药物依赖和副作用情况进行比较。对 REZ 组(21 人)、RGZ 组(20 人)和 AST 组(25 人)的有效性、安全性和应用方便性参数进行了比较。所有治疗组的疼痛均有明显改善,且效果相似。结论在这项初步调查中,所研究的 AST 在疗效和安全性方面没有任何优劣迹象,显示出与传统靶点相当的效果。由于使用这种方法无需阻滞以保护脑干,因此可根据需要选择用于某些患者,甚至可作为一种替代方法在更大规模的研究中进行探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anterior selective targeting for radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a cohort study

Objective

Before commonly used targets such as the Retrogasserian Zone (RGZ) and the Root Entry Zone (REZ) were adopted for the radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), a more anterior target involving the Gasserian ganglion was used. Thanks to advancements in imaging technology, it is now possible to identify and target separate nerve divisions in Meckel’s Cave as desired. Although this approach has been mentioned previously, no clinical study has investigated it until now. This study aims to fill this gap in the literature.

Methods

Trigeminal neuralgia patients who received radiosurgical treatment between February 2019 and June 2022 in a single centre were included in the study. Pain relief, medication dependency and side effect profiles of the investigated anterior selective target (AST) were compared to those of the classical targets at 1 week, 1–3-6 months, and 1 year.

Results

A total of 66 patients were included in the study. Effectiveness, safety and application convenience parameters were compared between; the REZ (n = 21), RGZ (n = 20) and AST (n = 25) groups. All groups showed significant improvement in pain with similar results to each other. AST treatments were performed in significantly shorter beam-on-times and with significantly lower brainstem doses.

Conclusions

The investigated AST showed comparable results to the classical targets without any indication of superiority or inferiority in terms of efficacy and safety in this preliminary investigation. As no blocks were needed to protect the brainstem with this method, it can be used for select patients as needed and could even be investigated in larger studies as an alternative approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of cerebral infarction after bypass surgery in adult moyamoya disease: combing parameters on 4D perfusion CT with clinical related factors Laser interstitial thermal therapy for hypothalamic-hamartoma-related epilepsy: the long-term cognitive outcome of the first pediatric case in Europe Anterior selective targeting for radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a cohort study Prognostic role of extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy in de novo anaplastic meningiomas An examination of seizure-free outcome and visual field deficits: Anterior temporal lobectomy versus selective amygdalohippocampectomy for temporal lobe epilepsy—a systematic review and meta-analysis for comprehensive understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1