泰国烟草控制利益相关者对《公约》第 5.3 条的态度及其与对烟草业策略认识的关系。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017541
Roengrudee Patanavanich, Paweena Punkrajang, Jaruayporn Ingkasereepitak, Warodom Phaenthong, Chantapol Yimnual, Sarin Katithamanit, Praepilai Wichakpan
{"title":"泰国烟草控制利益相关者对《公约》第 5.3 条的态度及其与对烟草业策略认识的关系。","authors":"Roengrudee Patanavanich, Paweena Punkrajang, Jaruayporn Ingkasereepitak, Warodom Phaenthong, Chantapol Yimnual, Sarin Katithamanit, Praepilai Wichakpan","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) was developed to protect public health policies from tobacco industry interference. The guiding principles of Article 5.3 emphasise a fundamental conflict between the tobacco industry's interests and public health interests (principle 1) and recommend that the government be accountable and transparent (principle 2), demand accountability and transparency from the industry (principle 3), and refrain from providing incentives to the industry (principle 4). This study quantitatively explored attitudes towards Article 5.3's guiding principles and recommendations among Thai tobacco control stakeholders and whether they were associated with awareness of tobacco industry tactics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online survey of 703 individuals involved in tobacco control in Thailand . We employed multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis to explore factors associated with attitudes towards Article 5.3's guiding principles and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>441 participants responded to the survey (response rate 62.7%). Among the Article 5.3 guiding principles, principle 1 received the lowest agreement (83%), whereas the other three principles had an average of 93% agreement. In multivariable ordinal logistic regression, we found awareness of tobacco industry tactics was associated with Article 5.3's guiding principles: principle 1 (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.11; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.15; p<0.001), principle 2 (AOR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12; p=0.002), principle 3 (AOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.15; p<0.001) and principle 4 (AOR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.19; p<0.001). In addition to awareness of tobacco industry tactics, age, years of experience in tobacco control, role in tobacco control and smoking by family members and friends were associated with perspectives towards Article 5.3's guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides quantitative evidence of the association between attitudes towards WHO FCTC Article 5.3 and awareness of tobacco industry tactics in Thailand. Denormalisation of the tobacco industry is thus a vital component of successfully implementing and enforcing Article 5.3.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes towards FCTC Article 5.3 among tobacco control stakeholders in Thailand and their relationship with awareness of tobacco industry tactics.\",\"authors\":\"Roengrudee Patanavanich, Paweena Punkrajang, Jaruayporn Ingkasereepitak, Warodom Phaenthong, Chantapol Yimnual, Sarin Katithamanit, Praepilai Wichakpan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) was developed to protect public health policies from tobacco industry interference. The guiding principles of Article 5.3 emphasise a fundamental conflict between the tobacco industry's interests and public health interests (principle 1) and recommend that the government be accountable and transparent (principle 2), demand accountability and transparency from the industry (principle 3), and refrain from providing incentives to the industry (principle 4). This study quantitatively explored attitudes towards Article 5.3's guiding principles and recommendations among Thai tobacco control stakeholders and whether they were associated with awareness of tobacco industry tactics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online survey of 703 individuals involved in tobacco control in Thailand . We employed multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis to explore factors associated with attitudes towards Article 5.3's guiding principles and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>441 participants responded to the survey (response rate 62.7%). Among the Article 5.3 guiding principles, principle 1 received the lowest agreement (83%), whereas the other three principles had an average of 93% agreement. In multivariable ordinal logistic regression, we found awareness of tobacco industry tactics was associated with Article 5.3's guiding principles: principle 1 (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.11; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.15; p<0.001), principle 2 (AOR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12; p=0.002), principle 3 (AOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.15; p<0.001) and principle 4 (AOR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.19; p<0.001). In addition to awareness of tobacco industry tactics, age, years of experience in tobacco control, role in tobacco control and smoking by family members and friends were associated with perspectives towards Article 5.3's guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides quantitative evidence of the association between attitudes towards WHO FCTC Article 5.3 and awareness of tobacco industry tactics in Thailand. Denormalisation of the tobacco industry is thus a vital component of successfully implementing and enforcing Article 5.3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603716/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017541\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世卫组织《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)第 5.3 条旨在保护公共卫生政策不受烟草业干扰。第 5.3 条的指导原则强调了烟草行业利益与公共卫生利益之间的根本冲突(原则 1),并建议政府承担责任并保持透明(原则 2),要求烟草行业承担责任并保持透明(原则 3),以及避免向烟草行业提供激励(原则 4)。本研究定量探讨了泰国烟草控制利益相关者对第 5.3 条指导原则和建议的态度,以及这些态度是否与对烟草行业策略的认识相关:我们对泰国 703 名烟草控制相关人员进行了在线调查。我们采用多变量序数逻辑回归分析来探讨与对第 5.3 条指导原则和建议的态度相关的因素:441 名参与者对调查做出了回复(回复率为 62.7%)。在第 5.3 条指导原则中,原则 1 的同意率最低(83%),而其他三项原则的平均同意率为 93%。在多变量序数逻辑回归中,我们发现对烟草业策略的认识与第 5.3 条的指导原则有关:原则 1(调整 OR (AOR) 1.11; 95% CI 1.07 至 1.15; p结论:本研究提供了定量证据,证明泰国人对世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》第 5.3 条的态度与对烟草行业策略的认识之间存在关联。因此,烟草行业的非规范化是成功实施和执行第 5.3 条的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes towards FCTC Article 5.3 among tobacco control stakeholders in Thailand and their relationship with awareness of tobacco industry tactics.

Background: Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) was developed to protect public health policies from tobacco industry interference. The guiding principles of Article 5.3 emphasise a fundamental conflict between the tobacco industry's interests and public health interests (principle 1) and recommend that the government be accountable and transparent (principle 2), demand accountability and transparency from the industry (principle 3), and refrain from providing incentives to the industry (principle 4). This study quantitatively explored attitudes towards Article 5.3's guiding principles and recommendations among Thai tobacco control stakeholders and whether they were associated with awareness of tobacco industry tactics.

Methods: We conducted an online survey of 703 individuals involved in tobacco control in Thailand . We employed multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis to explore factors associated with attitudes towards Article 5.3's guiding principles and recommendations.

Results: 441 participants responded to the survey (response rate 62.7%). Among the Article 5.3 guiding principles, principle 1 received the lowest agreement (83%), whereas the other three principles had an average of 93% agreement. In multivariable ordinal logistic regression, we found awareness of tobacco industry tactics was associated with Article 5.3's guiding principles: principle 1 (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.11; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.15; p<0.001), principle 2 (AOR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12; p=0.002), principle 3 (AOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.15; p<0.001) and principle 4 (AOR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.19; p<0.001). In addition to awareness of tobacco industry tactics, age, years of experience in tobacco control, role in tobacco control and smoking by family members and friends were associated with perspectives towards Article 5.3's guidelines.

Conclusions: This study provides quantitative evidence of the association between attitudes towards WHO FCTC Article 5.3 and awareness of tobacco industry tactics in Thailand. Denormalisation of the tobacco industry is thus a vital component of successfully implementing and enforcing Article 5.3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Age- and sex-specific incidence rates and future projections for hip fractures in Zimbabwe. Strengthening advanced therapy for sickle cell disease in Africa: experience from sickle cell disease centre in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. How climate change is shaping young people's health: a participatory, youth co-led study from Bangladesh, Guatemala and Nigeria. Exploring the burden of cholera in the WHO African region: patterns and trends from 2000 to 2023 cholera outbreak data. Gender equality and quality of life must be central to the design and delivery of sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1