加强死后诊断:在法医病理学中实施 ISO 17020 认证和准则十多年。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s12024-024-00918-0
Wouter Van Den Bogaert, Joke Wuestenbergs, Bram Bekaert, Elisabeth Dequeker, Wim Van de Voorde
{"title":"加强死后诊断:在法医病理学中实施 ISO 17020 认证和准则十多年。","authors":"Wouter Van Den Bogaert, Joke Wuestenbergs, Bram Bekaert, Elisabeth Dequeker, Wim Van de Voorde","doi":"10.1007/s12024-024-00918-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forensic autopsies remain indispensable for accurately determining the cause and manner of death. However, pathologists face significant challenges inherent to the complex process of postmortem diagnostics (PMD), including the potential for diagnostic errors. The implementation of quality assurance (QA) mechanisms is crucial for minimizing these errors. Nonetheless, the lack of QA programs, specifically tailored for forensic pathology, continues to pose a significant obstacle. This article explores the enhancement of PMD after the adoption of ISO 17020 accreditation at a Belgian forensic institute in 2010. Drawing on over a decade of experience, it details on the development and implementation of label-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) designed to address the various types of deaths in forensic practice. Additionally, it underscores the necessity of adapting international directives from leading organizations into effective local protocols, aiming to standardize practices and improve efficacy. Through a comparative review of existing international guidelines, this study provides forensic pathologists and institutions worldwide with practical strategies for qualitative standardization and improving their PMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12449,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing postmortem diagnostics: over a decade of ISO 17020 accreditation and guidelines implementation in forensic pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Wouter Van Den Bogaert, Joke Wuestenbergs, Bram Bekaert, Elisabeth Dequeker, Wim Van de Voorde\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12024-024-00918-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Forensic autopsies remain indispensable for accurately determining the cause and manner of death. However, pathologists face significant challenges inherent to the complex process of postmortem diagnostics (PMD), including the potential for diagnostic errors. The implementation of quality assurance (QA) mechanisms is crucial for minimizing these errors. Nonetheless, the lack of QA programs, specifically tailored for forensic pathology, continues to pose a significant obstacle. This article explores the enhancement of PMD after the adoption of ISO 17020 accreditation at a Belgian forensic institute in 2010. Drawing on over a decade of experience, it details on the development and implementation of label-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) designed to address the various types of deaths in forensic practice. Additionally, it underscores the necessity of adapting international directives from leading organizations into effective local protocols, aiming to standardize practices and improve efficacy. Through a comparative review of existing international guidelines, this study provides forensic pathologists and institutions worldwide with practical strategies for qualitative standardization and improving their PMD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00918-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00918-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法医尸检对于准确确定死亡原因和死亡方式仍然不可或缺。然而,病理学家面临着死后诊断(PMD)这一复杂过程所固有的重大挑战,包括可能出现诊断错误。实施质量保证(QA)机制对于最大限度地减少这些错误至关重要。然而,缺乏专门针对法医病理学的质量保证计划仍然是一个重大障碍。本文探讨了比利时一家法医研究所在 2010 年通过 ISO 17020 认证后对 PMD 的改进。根据十多年的经验,文章详细介绍了标签特定标准操作程序 (SOP) 的制定和实施情况,这些程序旨在处理法医实践中的各类死亡案例。此外,它还强调了将主要组织的国际指令调整为有效的本地规程的必要性,旨在规范实践并提高效率。通过对现有国际指南的比较审查,本研究为世界各地的法医病理学家和机构提供了定性标准化和改善其项目管理的实用策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing postmortem diagnostics: over a decade of ISO 17020 accreditation and guidelines implementation in forensic pathology.

Forensic autopsies remain indispensable for accurately determining the cause and manner of death. However, pathologists face significant challenges inherent to the complex process of postmortem diagnostics (PMD), including the potential for diagnostic errors. The implementation of quality assurance (QA) mechanisms is crucial for minimizing these errors. Nonetheless, the lack of QA programs, specifically tailored for forensic pathology, continues to pose a significant obstacle. This article explores the enhancement of PMD after the adoption of ISO 17020 accreditation at a Belgian forensic institute in 2010. Drawing on over a decade of experience, it details on the development and implementation of label-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) designed to address the various types of deaths in forensic practice. Additionally, it underscores the necessity of adapting international directives from leading organizations into effective local protocols, aiming to standardize practices and improve efficacy. Through a comparative review of existing international guidelines, this study provides forensic pathologists and institutions worldwide with practical strategies for qualitative standardization and improving their PMD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology MEDICINE, LEGAL-PATHOLOGY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology encompasses all aspects of modern day forensics, equally applying to children or adults, either living or the deceased. This includes forensic science, medicine, nursing, and pathology, as well as toxicology, human identification, mass disasters/mass war graves, profiling, imaging, policing, wound assessment, sexual assault, anthropology, archeology, forensic search, entomology, botany, biology, veterinary pathology, and DNA. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology presents a balance of forensic research and reviews from around the world to reflect modern advances through peer-reviewed papers, short communications, meeting proceedings and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Dog bites or knife wounds? A case report of atypical neck injuries. Enhancing postmortem diagnostics: over a decade of ISO 17020 accreditation and guidelines implementation in forensic pathology. Suicidal behavior among forensic psychiatric patients in Japan: Risk factors and implications for treatment. Blue toe syndrome - systemic cholesterol crystal embolism secondary to cardiovascular procedures: a forensic autopsy report of two cases. Identifying latent subgroups of primary head injury: an explorative latent class analysis on neuropathologically examined medico-legal autopsy cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1