体重指数对宫颈环扎术结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Facts Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1159/000542543
Lihua Yang, Hua Yang
{"title":"体重指数对宫颈环扎术结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Lihua Yang, Hua Yang","doi":"10.1159/000542543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of the review was to examine the impact of maternal body mass index (BMI) on outcomes of cervical cerclage for cervical insufficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospectively registered review (CRD42024512436) searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for comparative studies published before 6th March 2024. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of females undergoing cerclage were compared based on BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included. Pooled data showed that the risk of preterm birth (<37 weeks) was significantly increased in the obese vs non-obese group (OR: 1.32 95% CI: 1.15, 1.51 I2=36%). Gestation age at delivery in weeks was also found to be significantly lower in the obese group (MD: -2.47 95% CI: -4.83, -0.12 I2=96%). There was no significant difference in the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes and chorioamnionitis between the two groups. Still, the rate of cesarean sections was significantly higher in the obese group. Neonatal birth weight in grams was not found to be significantly different between obese and non-obese groups but the risk of NICU admission was significantly increased in the obese group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-quality evidence indicates that obesity may lead to an increased risk of PTB in women undergoing cervical cerclage. The risk of cesarean section and NICU admission is also increased in obese females.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of body mass index on outcomes of cervical cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lihua Yang, Hua Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of the review was to examine the impact of maternal body mass index (BMI) on outcomes of cervical cerclage for cervical insufficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospectively registered review (CRD42024512436) searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for comparative studies published before 6th March 2024. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of females undergoing cerclage were compared based on BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included. Pooled data showed that the risk of preterm birth (<37 weeks) was significantly increased in the obese vs non-obese group (OR: 1.32 95% CI: 1.15, 1.51 I2=36%). Gestation age at delivery in weeks was also found to be significantly lower in the obese group (MD: -2.47 95% CI: -4.83, -0.12 I2=96%). There was no significant difference in the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes and chorioamnionitis between the two groups. Still, the rate of cesarean sections was significantly higher in the obese group. Neonatal birth weight in grams was not found to be significantly different between obese and non-obese groups but the risk of NICU admission was significantly increased in the obese group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-quality evidence indicates that obesity may lead to an increased risk of PTB in women undergoing cervical cerclage. The risk of cesarean section and NICU admission is also increased in obese females.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Facts\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Facts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542543\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本综述旨在研究产妇体重指数(BMI)对宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全结果的影响:该前瞻性注册综述(CRD42024512436)检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science在2024年3月6日之前发表的对比研究。根据 BMI 比较了接受宫颈环扎术的产妇和新生儿的预后:结果:共纳入七项研究。汇总数据显示,早产风险(结论:低质量的证据表明,肥胖可能导致早产:低质量的证据表明,肥胖可能导致接受宫颈环扎术的女性发生早产的风险增加。肥胖女性剖宫产和入住新生儿重症监护室的风险也会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of body mass index on outcomes of cervical cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: The purpose of the review was to examine the impact of maternal body mass index (BMI) on outcomes of cervical cerclage for cervical insufficiency.

Methods: This prospectively registered review (CRD42024512436) searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for comparative studies published before 6th March 2024. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of females undergoing cerclage were compared based on BMI.

Results: Seven studies were included. Pooled data showed that the risk of preterm birth (<37 weeks) was significantly increased in the obese vs non-obese group (OR: 1.32 95% CI: 1.15, 1.51 I2=36%). Gestation age at delivery in weeks was also found to be significantly lower in the obese group (MD: -2.47 95% CI: -4.83, -0.12 I2=96%). There was no significant difference in the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes and chorioamnionitis between the two groups. Still, the rate of cesarean sections was significantly higher in the obese group. Neonatal birth weight in grams was not found to be significantly different between obese and non-obese groups but the risk of NICU admission was significantly increased in the obese group.

Conclusion: Low-quality evidence indicates that obesity may lead to an increased risk of PTB in women undergoing cervical cerclage. The risk of cesarean section and NICU admission is also increased in obese females.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Facts
Obesity Facts 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.
期刊最新文献
Impact of body mass index on outcomes of cervical cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Socioeconomic and demographic inequalities in off-label prescription of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists - a Swedish descriptive cohort study. The One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass is a suitable alternative to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 : a propensity-score matched analysis. Omentin increases glucose uptake, but not insulin sensitivity in human myotubes dependent on extracellular lactotransferrin. Burden of Disease and Cost of Illness of Overweight and Obesity in Portugal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1