{"title":"采用高眼压和低眼压设置的超声乳化手机的效率。","authors":"Justin Spaulding, Brad Hall","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP (20 mmHg) to the Ozil handpiece at high IOP (50 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice (Medford, OR, USA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single site, prospective, double-arm, randomized, contralateral eye study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first operated eye was randomized to receive phacoemulsification with either the Active Sentry handpiece at 20 mmHg (Active Sentry group) or the Ozil handpiece at 50 mmHg (Ozil group). The second operated eye was assigned to the other group. Outcome measures included phaco time, total aspiration time, aspiration time during phaco, fluid use, cumulative dissipated energy, total torsional time, total longitudinal time, and central corneal thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 subjects (72 eyes) completed the study. Mean total aspiration time was 90.1 ± 16.4 s in the Active Sentry group and 85.1 ± 17.0 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean aspiration time during phaco was 40.9 ± 8.5 s in the Active Sentry group and 40.4 ± 8.8 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).Mean total phaco time was 29.5 ± 7.3 s in the Active Sentry group and 31.0 ± 7.4 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean total fluid volume was 32.8 ± 4.6 mL in the Active Sentry group and 33.8 ± 6.0 mL in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP settings and the Ozil handpiece at high IOP are similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of phacoemulsification handpieces with high and low intraocular pressure settings.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Spaulding, Brad Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP (20 mmHg) to the Ozil handpiece at high IOP (50 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice (Medford, OR, USA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single site, prospective, double-arm, randomized, contralateral eye study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first operated eye was randomized to receive phacoemulsification with either the Active Sentry handpiece at 20 mmHg (Active Sentry group) or the Ozil handpiece at 50 mmHg (Ozil group). The second operated eye was assigned to the other group. Outcome measures included phaco time, total aspiration time, aspiration time during phaco, fluid use, cumulative dissipated energy, total torsional time, total longitudinal time, and central corneal thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 subjects (72 eyes) completed the study. Mean total aspiration time was 90.1 ± 16.4 s in the Active Sentry group and 85.1 ± 17.0 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean aspiration time during phaco was 40.9 ± 8.5 s in the Active Sentry group and 40.4 ± 8.8 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).Mean total phaco time was 29.5 ± 7.3 s in the Active Sentry group and 31.0 ± 7.4 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean total fluid volume was 32.8 ± 4.6 mL in the Active Sentry group and 33.8 ± 6.0 mL in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP settings and the Ozil handpiece at high IOP are similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficiency of phacoemulsification handpieces with high and low intraocular pressure settings.
Purpose: To compare the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP (20 mmHg) to the Ozil handpiece at high IOP (50 mmHg).
Setting: Private practice (Medford, OR, USA).
Design: Single site, prospective, double-arm, randomized, contralateral eye study.
Methods: The first operated eye was randomized to receive phacoemulsification with either the Active Sentry handpiece at 20 mmHg (Active Sentry group) or the Ozil handpiece at 50 mmHg (Ozil group). The second operated eye was assigned to the other group. Outcome measures included phaco time, total aspiration time, aspiration time during phaco, fluid use, cumulative dissipated energy, total torsional time, total longitudinal time, and central corneal thickness.
Results: A total of 36 subjects (72 eyes) completed the study. Mean total aspiration time was 90.1 ± 16.4 s in the Active Sentry group and 85.1 ± 17.0 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean aspiration time during phaco was 40.9 ± 8.5 s in the Active Sentry group and 40.4 ± 8.8 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).Mean total phaco time was 29.5 ± 7.3 s in the Active Sentry group and 31.0 ± 7.4 s in the Ozil group (p > 0.05). Mean total fluid volume was 32.8 ± 4.6 mL in the Active Sentry group and 33.8 ± 6.0 mL in the Ozil group (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the efficiencies of the Active Sentry handpiece at low IOP settings and the Ozil handpiece at high IOP are similar.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.