在运动执行和运动规划过程中,控制策略可根据任务需求进行调整。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1152/jn.00410.2023
Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Robert M Hardwick
{"title":"在运动执行和运动规划过程中,控制策略可根据任务需求进行调整。","authors":"Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Robert M Hardwick","doi":"10.1152/jn.00410.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Movement planning consists of several processes related to the preparation of a movement such as decision making, target selection, application of task demands, action selection, and specification of movement kinematics. These numerous processes are reflected in the reaction time, which is the time that it takes to start executing the movement. However, not all the processes that lead to motor planning increase reaction time. In this paper, we wanted to test whether tuning the control policy to task demands contributes to reaction time. Taking into account that the tuning of the control policy differs for narrow and wide targets, we used a timed response paradigm to track the amount of time needed to tune the control policy appropriately to task demands. We discovered that it does not take any time during motor planning and even that it can occur indistinguishably during motor planning or during motor execution. That is, the tuning the control policy was equally good when the narrow or wide target was displayed before than when it was displayed after the start of the movement. These results suggest that the frontier between motor planning and execution is not as clear cut as it is often depicted.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Movement preparation consists of different processes such as target selection and movement parameters selection. We investigate the time that it takes to tune movement parameters to task demands. We found that the brain does this instantaneously and that this can even happen during movement. Therefore, this suggests that there exists an overlap during movement planning and execution.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"232-244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A control policy can be adapted to task demands during both motor execution and motor planning.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Robert M Hardwick\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00410.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Movement planning consists of several processes related to the preparation of a movement such as decision making, target selection, application of task demands, action selection, and specification of movement kinematics. These numerous processes are reflected in the reaction time, which is the time that it takes to start executing the movement. However, not all the processes that lead to motor planning increase reaction time. In this paper, we wanted to test whether tuning the control policy to task demands contributes to reaction time. Taking into account that the tuning of the control policy differs for narrow and wide targets, we used a timed response paradigm to track the amount of time needed to tune the control policy appropriately to task demands. We discovered that it does not take any time during motor planning and even that it can occur indistinguishably during motor planning or during motor execution. That is, the tuning the control policy was equally good when the narrow or wide target was displayed before than when it was displayed after the start of the movement. These results suggest that the frontier between motor planning and execution is not as clear cut as it is often depicted.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Movement preparation consists of different processes such as target selection and movement parameters selection. We investigate the time that it takes to tune movement parameters to task demands. We found that the brain does this instantaneously and that this can even happen during movement. Therefore, this suggests that there exists an overlap during movement planning and execution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"232-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00410.2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00410.2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动规划包括与运动准备有关的几个过程,如决策、目标选择、任务需求应用、动作选择和运动运动学规范。这些众多过程都反映在反应时间上,即开始执行动作所需的时间。然而,并非所有导致运动规划的过程都会增加反应时间。在本文中,我们想测试根据任务需求调整控制策略是否有助于缩短反应时间。考虑到窄目标和宽目标的控制策略调整有所不同,我们采用了定时反应范式,以跟踪根据任务需求适当调整控制策略所需的时间。我们发现,在运动规划过程中不需要花费任何时间,甚至在运动规划和运动执行过程中也会出现这种情况。也就是说,在运动开始前显示窄目标或宽目标时,与在运动开始后显示窄目标或宽目标时,控制策略的调整效果一样好。这些结果表明,运动规划和运动执行之间的界限并不像通常描述的那样清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A control policy can be adapted to task demands during both motor execution and motor planning.

Movement planning consists of several processes related to the preparation of a movement such as decision making, target selection, application of task demands, action selection, and specification of movement kinematics. These numerous processes are reflected in the reaction time, which is the time that it takes to start executing the movement. However, not all the processes that lead to motor planning increase reaction time. In this paper, we wanted to test whether tuning the control policy to task demands contributes to reaction time. Taking into account that the tuning of the control policy differs for narrow and wide targets, we used a timed response paradigm to track the amount of time needed to tune the control policy appropriately to task demands. We discovered that it does not take any time during motor planning and even that it can occur indistinguishably during motor planning or during motor execution. That is, the tuning the control policy was equally good when the narrow or wide target was displayed before than when it was displayed after the start of the movement. These results suggest that the frontier between motor planning and execution is not as clear cut as it is often depicted.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Movement preparation consists of different processes such as target selection and movement parameters selection. We investigate the time that it takes to tune movement parameters to task demands. We found that the brain does this instantaneously and that this can even happen during movement. Therefore, this suggests that there exists an overlap during movement planning and execution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
期刊最新文献
Changes in thoracic erector spinae regional activation during postural adjustments and functional reaching tasks after spinal cord injury. Cortical acetylcholine response to deep brain stimulation of the basal forebrain in mice. Differentiating the contributions of Na+/K+ pump current and persistent Na+ current in simulated voltage-clamp experiments. Feature selectivity of corticocortical feedback along the primate dorsal visual pathway. Without visual feedback voluntary torque is overestimated during muscle potentiation despite similar motor unit firing rate and perception of exertion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1