Michał C Czarnogórski, Layla Settaf-Cherif, Krzysztof Koper, Piotr Petrasz, Adam Ostrowski, Kajetan Juszczak, Tomasz Drewa, Jan Adamowicz
{"title":"机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中的神经保留技术--解剖学方法。","authors":"Michał C Czarnogórski, Layla Settaf-Cherif, Krzysztof Koper, Piotr Petrasz, Adam Ostrowski, Kajetan Juszczak, Tomasz Drewa, Jan Adamowicz","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are foundational to preserving sexual function and urinary continence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article aims to classify nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach to the prostate. We have identified three main NS approaches in RARP: anterior, lateral, and posterior. The anterior approach, which involves early retrograde nerve release, improves early potency rates. The lateral approach, using hybrid techniques and extra-fascial dissection, provides clear nerve visualization and reduces nerve injuries, enhancing continence and potency recovery. The posterior approach, particularly the hood technique, effectively preserves periurethral structures, leading to high continence rates within a year post-surgery. The posterior approach effectively balances nerve preservation with cancer control.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Re-classifying NS techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach optimizes patient outcomes and the surgeon choice. A personalized approach to those techniques improves functional recovery and maintains oncological safety in PCa surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm those findings and refine the selection criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nerve-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - anatomical approach.\",\"authors\":\"Michał C Czarnogórski, Layla Settaf-Cherif, Krzysztof Koper, Piotr Petrasz, Adam Ostrowski, Kajetan Juszczak, Tomasz Drewa, Jan Adamowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are foundational to preserving sexual function and urinary continence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article aims to classify nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach to the prostate. We have identified three main NS approaches in RARP: anterior, lateral, and posterior. The anterior approach, which involves early retrograde nerve release, improves early potency rates. The lateral approach, using hybrid techniques and extra-fascial dissection, provides clear nerve visualization and reduces nerve injuries, enhancing continence and potency recovery. The posterior approach, particularly the hood technique, effectively preserves periurethral structures, leading to high continence rates within a year post-surgery. The posterior approach effectively balances nerve preservation with cancer control.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Re-classifying NS techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach optimizes patient outcomes and the surgeon choice. A personalized approach to those techniques improves functional recovery and maintains oncological safety in PCa surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm those findings and refine the selection criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1101-1110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nerve-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - anatomical approach.
Introduction: Nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are foundational to preserving sexual function and urinary continence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.
Areas covered: This article aims to classify nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach to the prostate. We have identified three main NS approaches in RARP: anterior, lateral, and posterior. The anterior approach, which involves early retrograde nerve release, improves early potency rates. The lateral approach, using hybrid techniques and extra-fascial dissection, provides clear nerve visualization and reduces nerve injuries, enhancing continence and potency recovery. The posterior approach, particularly the hood technique, effectively preserves periurethral structures, leading to high continence rates within a year post-surgery. The posterior approach effectively balances nerve preservation with cancer control.
Expert opinion: Re-classifying NS techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach optimizes patient outcomes and the surgeon choice. A personalized approach to those techniques improves functional recovery and maintains oncological safety in PCa surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm those findings and refine the selection criteria.