机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中的神经保留技术--解剖学方法。

Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123
Michał C Czarnogórski, Layla Settaf-Cherif, Krzysztof Koper, Piotr Petrasz, Adam Ostrowski, Kajetan Juszczak, Tomasz Drewa, Jan Adamowicz
{"title":"机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中的神经保留技术--解剖学方法。","authors":"Michał C Czarnogórski, Layla Settaf-Cherif, Krzysztof Koper, Piotr Petrasz, Adam Ostrowski, Kajetan Juszczak, Tomasz Drewa, Jan Adamowicz","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are foundational to preserving sexual function and urinary continence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article aims to classify nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach to the prostate. We have identified three main NS approaches in RARP: anterior, lateral, and posterior. The anterior approach, which involves early retrograde nerve release, improves early potency rates. The lateral approach, using hybrid techniques and extra-fascial dissection, provides clear nerve visualization and reduces nerve injuries, enhancing continence and potency recovery. The posterior approach, particularly the hood technique, effectively preserves periurethral structures, leading to high continence rates within a year post-surgery. The posterior approach effectively balances nerve preservation with cancer control.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Re-classifying NS techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach optimizes patient outcomes and the surgeon choice. A personalized approach to those techniques improves functional recovery and maintains oncological safety in PCa surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm those findings and refine the selection criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nerve-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - anatomical approach.\",\"authors\":\"Michał C Czarnogórski, Layla Settaf-Cherif, Krzysztof Koper, Piotr Petrasz, Adam Ostrowski, Kajetan Juszczak, Tomasz Drewa, Jan Adamowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are foundational to preserving sexual function and urinary continence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article aims to classify nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach to the prostate. We have identified three main NS approaches in RARP: anterior, lateral, and posterior. The anterior approach, which involves early retrograde nerve release, improves early potency rates. The lateral approach, using hybrid techniques and extra-fascial dissection, provides clear nerve visualization and reduces nerve injuries, enhancing continence and potency recovery. The posterior approach, particularly the hood technique, effectively preserves periurethral structures, leading to high continence rates within a year post-surgery. The posterior approach effectively balances nerve preservation with cancer control.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Re-classifying NS techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach optimizes patient outcomes and the surgeon choice. A personalized approach to those techniques improves functional recovery and maintains oncological safety in PCa surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm those findings and refine the selection criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1101-1110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2436123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)中的神经保留(NS)技术是保留前列腺癌(PCa)患者性功能和排尿功能的基础:本文旨在根据前列腺的解剖方法对前列腺癌根治术中的神经保留(NS)技术进行分类。我们确定了 RARP 中的三种主要 NS 方法:前路、侧路和后路。前部方法涉及早期逆行神经松解,可提高早期有效率。侧位方法采用混合技术和筋膜外剥离,可清晰观察神经,减少神经损伤,提高排尿连续性和恢复能力。后路方法,尤其是罩式技术,可有效保留尿道周围结构,从而提高术后一年内的尿失禁率。后入路有效平衡了神经保护和癌症控制:专家观点:根据解剖学方法重新划分RARP中的NS技术可优化患者的治疗效果和外科医生的选择。专家观点:根据解剖方法对RARP中的NS技术进行重新分类,可优化患者预后和外科医生的选择。这些技术的个性化方法可改善PCa手术中的功能恢复并保持肿瘤安全性。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并完善选择标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nerve-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - anatomical approach.

Introduction: Nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) are foundational to preserving sexual function and urinary continence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

Areas covered: This article aims to classify nerve-sparing (NS) techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach to the prostate. We have identified three main NS approaches in RARP: anterior, lateral, and posterior. The anterior approach, which involves early retrograde nerve release, improves early potency rates. The lateral approach, using hybrid techniques and extra-fascial dissection, provides clear nerve visualization and reduces nerve injuries, enhancing continence and potency recovery. The posterior approach, particularly the hood technique, effectively preserves periurethral structures, leading to high continence rates within a year post-surgery. The posterior approach effectively balances nerve preservation with cancer control.

Expert opinion: Re-classifying NS techniques in RARP based on an anatomical approach optimizes patient outcomes and the surgeon choice. A personalized approach to those techniques improves functional recovery and maintains oncological safety in PCa surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm those findings and refine the selection criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proactive esophageal cooling during radiofrequency cardiac ablation: data update including applications in very high-power short duration ablation. Device profile of the Mobi-C artificial cervical disc: an overview of its safety and efficacy. BComparison of supraglottic airway device vs. endotracheal intubation for initial airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of elevated body mass index on the success of total knee and total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview. Comparison of 6-lead smartphone ECG and 12-lead ECG in athletes and a genetic heart disease population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1