原发性肾癌的立体定向消融放疗-国际实践模式调查

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100891
Katherine Taplin , Raquibul Hannan , Simon S. Lo , Scott C. Morgan , Muhammad Ali , Samantha Sigurdson , Matthias Guckenberger , Anand Swaminath
{"title":"原发性肾癌的立体定向消融放疗-国际实践模式调查","authors":"Katherine Taplin ,&nbsp;Raquibul Hannan ,&nbsp;Simon S. Lo ,&nbsp;Scott C. Morgan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali ,&nbsp;Samantha Sigurdson ,&nbsp;Matthias Guckenberger ,&nbsp;Anand Swaminath","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To conduct an international survey of radiation oncologists treating primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with SABR to ascertain the general patterns of SABR use, common dose/treatment/follow-up details, and expected outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A 51-question survey was created containing the following themes: prevalence and clinical scenarios in which RCC SABR is used, dose-fractionation schedules, treatment delivery details, follow-up/outcome assessments, and implementation barriers. The survey was distributed widely across multiple influential radiation oncology societies and social media, and ran from January to April 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 255 respondents participated, mostly from academic centers within Europe/North America. Of these, 40 % (n = 102) currently offer SABR (50 % having begun within the last 3 years). Common barriers in non-users included lack of referrals by urologists and lack of supportive practice guidelines. Of respondents who do offer SABR, 77 % treat both small (4 cm or less) and large (&gt;4 cm) renal masses. Dose-fractionation strategies varied from 27-52 Gy (3–5 fractions) for multifraction regimens, and 15–34 Gy for single fractions. Apart from treatment for medically inoperable disease, scenarios in which SABR was likely to be offered were for recurrence post surgery/thermal ablation and for oligometastatic kidney lesions. Uncommon scenarios included RCC with renal vein/inferior vena cava thrombosis, and as cytoreductive therapy in metastatic RCC. Expected local control outcomes were generally above 70 %, higher for small versus large renal masses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SABR is a relatively newer indication for primary RCC, offered by less than 50% of respondents, with both consistent and variable practice patterns observed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for primary kidney cancer – An international patterns of practice survey\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Taplin ,&nbsp;Raquibul Hannan ,&nbsp;Simon S. Lo ,&nbsp;Scott C. Morgan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali ,&nbsp;Samantha Sigurdson ,&nbsp;Matthias Guckenberger ,&nbsp;Anand Swaminath\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To conduct an international survey of radiation oncologists treating primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with SABR to ascertain the general patterns of SABR use, common dose/treatment/follow-up details, and expected outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A 51-question survey was created containing the following themes: prevalence and clinical scenarios in which RCC SABR is used, dose-fractionation schedules, treatment delivery details, follow-up/outcome assessments, and implementation barriers. The survey was distributed widely across multiple influential radiation oncology societies and social media, and ran from January to April 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 255 respondents participated, mostly from academic centers within Europe/North America. Of these, 40 % (n = 102) currently offer SABR (50 % having begun within the last 3 years). Common barriers in non-users included lack of referrals by urologists and lack of supportive practice guidelines. Of respondents who do offer SABR, 77 % treat both small (4 cm or less) and large (&gt;4 cm) renal masses. Dose-fractionation strategies varied from 27-52 Gy (3–5 fractions) for multifraction regimens, and 15–34 Gy for single fractions. Apart from treatment for medically inoperable disease, scenarios in which SABR was likely to be offered were for recurrence post surgery/thermal ablation and for oligometastatic kidney lesions. Uncommon scenarios included RCC with renal vein/inferior vena cava thrombosis, and as cytoreductive therapy in metastatic RCC. Expected local control outcomes were generally above 70 %, higher for small versus large renal masses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SABR is a relatively newer indication for primary RCC, offered by less than 50% of respondents, with both consistent and variable practice patterns observed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400168X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400168X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对使用SABR治疗原发性肾细胞癌(RCC)的放射肿瘤学家进行国际调查,以确定SABR使用的一般模式、常见剂量/治疗/随访细节和预期结果。材料和方法创建了一项包含51个问题的调查,其中包含以下主题:使用RCC SABR的患病率和临床情况,剂量分级时间表,治疗交付细节,随访/结果评估以及实施障碍。该调查于2023年1月至4月在多个有影响力的放射肿瘤学学会和社交媒体上广泛发布。结果共有255名受访者参与,大部分来自欧洲/北美的学术中心。其中,40% (n = 102)目前提供SABR(50%是在过去3年内开始的)。非使用者的常见障碍包括缺乏泌尿科医生的转诊和缺乏支持性的实践指南。在提供SABR的应答者中,77%治疗小(4厘米或更小)和大(4厘米)肾肿块。剂量-分馏策略从多组分方案的27-52 Gy(3-5组分)到单组分方案的15-34 Gy不等。除了治疗医学上不能手术的疾病外,SABR可能用于手术后复发/热消融和肾少转移病变。不常见的情况包括肾静脉/下腔静脉血栓形成的肾细胞癌,以及转移性肾细胞癌的细胞减少治疗。预期的局部控制结果通常在70%以上,较小的肾肿块比较大的肾肿块更高。结论:ssabr是原发性RCC的一个相对较新的适应症,只有不到50%的受访者提供,并且观察到一致和可变的实践模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for primary kidney cancer – An international patterns of practice survey

Purpose

To conduct an international survey of radiation oncologists treating primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with SABR to ascertain the general patterns of SABR use, common dose/treatment/follow-up details, and expected outcomes.

Materials and methods

A 51-question survey was created containing the following themes: prevalence and clinical scenarios in which RCC SABR is used, dose-fractionation schedules, treatment delivery details, follow-up/outcome assessments, and implementation barriers. The survey was distributed widely across multiple influential radiation oncology societies and social media, and ran from January to April 2023.

Results

A total of 255 respondents participated, mostly from academic centers within Europe/North America. Of these, 40 % (n = 102) currently offer SABR (50 % having begun within the last 3 years). Common barriers in non-users included lack of referrals by urologists and lack of supportive practice guidelines. Of respondents who do offer SABR, 77 % treat both small (4 cm or less) and large (>4 cm) renal masses. Dose-fractionation strategies varied from 27-52 Gy (3–5 fractions) for multifraction regimens, and 15–34 Gy for single fractions. Apart from treatment for medically inoperable disease, scenarios in which SABR was likely to be offered were for recurrence post surgery/thermal ablation and for oligometastatic kidney lesions. Uncommon scenarios included RCC with renal vein/inferior vena cava thrombosis, and as cytoreductive therapy in metastatic RCC. Expected local control outcomes were generally above 70 %, higher for small versus large renal masses.

Conclusions

SABR is a relatively newer indication for primary RCC, offered by less than 50% of respondents, with both consistent and variable practice patterns observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Short-term survivors with brain metastases have modest benefits from focal and systemic therapies and remain frequent despite improving treatment landscape. Impact of tumor position displacement during end-exhalation breath-hold condition on tumor dose in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Detection of alteration in carotid artery volumetry using standard-of-care computed tomography surveillance scans following unilateral radiation therapy for early-stage tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma survivors: a cross-sectional internally-matched carotid isodose analysis. Large language models for pretreatment education in pediatric radiation oncology: A comparative evaluation study. Position in proton Bragg curve influences DNA damage complexity and survival in head and neck cancer cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1