专家对预防her2阳性乳腺癌患者脑转移的共识

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer treatment reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102860
Volkmar Müller , Thomas Bachelot , Giuseppe Curigliano , Evandro de Azambuja , Julia Furtner , Jens Gempt , Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa , Katarzyna J. Jerzak , Emilie Le Rhun , Carlo Palmieri , Gabriella Pravettoni , Cristina Saura , Rupert Bartsch
{"title":"专家对预防her2阳性乳腺癌患者脑转移的共识","authors":"Volkmar Müller ,&nbsp;Thomas Bachelot ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Curigliano ,&nbsp;Evandro de Azambuja ,&nbsp;Julia Furtner ,&nbsp;Jens Gempt ,&nbsp;Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa ,&nbsp;Katarzyna J. Jerzak ,&nbsp;Emilie Le Rhun ,&nbsp;Carlo Palmieri ,&nbsp;Gabriella Pravettoni ,&nbsp;Cristina Saura ,&nbsp;Rupert Bartsch","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have a significant risk of developing brain metastases (BrM), which have detrimental effects on survival outcomes and quality of life. Although there are several systemic treatment options available that may delay the appearance of BrM and secondary progression of previously treated BrM, there are still substantial unmet needs for this patient population and primary prevention remains elusive.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A group of experts created consensus statements, through a modified Delphi process, to bridge the gap between current unmet needs, available evidence, and international guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The steering committee reviewed all relevant literature and formed research questions to be answered by the subsequent consensus statements. In total, 61 contributors provided feedback on the consensus statements, with 34 statements reaching agreement out of the 55 statements that were voted on altogether. Statements with consensus aimed to define BrM primary and secondary prevention, screening procedures, assessment of symptoms, treatment efficacy, and preventing the occurrence and progression of BrM, while acknowledging the possibilities and limitations in daily clinical practice. Some statements did not reach agreement for a variety of reasons, mostly due to lack of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The consensus statements outlined in this publication provide a point of reference for daily clinical practice and can act as recommendations for clinical trial procedures and future guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 102860"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert consensus on the prevention of brain metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Volkmar Müller ,&nbsp;Thomas Bachelot ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Curigliano ,&nbsp;Evandro de Azambuja ,&nbsp;Julia Furtner ,&nbsp;Jens Gempt ,&nbsp;Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa ,&nbsp;Katarzyna J. Jerzak ,&nbsp;Emilie Le Rhun ,&nbsp;Carlo Palmieri ,&nbsp;Gabriella Pravettoni ,&nbsp;Cristina Saura ,&nbsp;Rupert Bartsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have a significant risk of developing brain metastases (BrM), which have detrimental effects on survival outcomes and quality of life. Although there are several systemic treatment options available that may delay the appearance of BrM and secondary progression of previously treated BrM, there are still substantial unmet needs for this patient population and primary prevention remains elusive.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A group of experts created consensus statements, through a modified Delphi process, to bridge the gap between current unmet needs, available evidence, and international guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The steering committee reviewed all relevant literature and formed research questions to be answered by the subsequent consensus statements. In total, 61 contributors provided feedback on the consensus statements, with 34 statements reaching agreement out of the 55 statements that were voted on altogether. Statements with consensus aimed to define BrM primary and secondary prevention, screening procedures, assessment of symptoms, treatment efficacy, and preventing the occurrence and progression of BrM, while acknowledging the possibilities and limitations in daily clinical practice. Some statements did not reach agreement for a variety of reasons, mostly due to lack of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The consensus statements outlined in this publication provide a point of reference for daily clinical practice and can act as recommendations for clinical trial procedures and future guidelines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102860\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001890\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001890","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

her2阳性乳腺癌患者发生脑转移(BrM)的风险很大,这对生存结果和生活质量有不利影响。尽管有几种系统治疗方案可以延缓BrM的出现和先前治疗的BrM的继发性进展,但这类患者群体仍有大量未满足的需求,初级预防仍然难以捉摸。方法一组专家通过改进的德尔菲过程形成共识声明,以弥合当前未满足的需求、现有证据和国际指南之间的差距。指导委员会审查了所有相关文献,并形成了研究问题,并通过随后的共识声明来回答。共有61个提案国就协商一致意见发言提供了反馈意见,在总共投票表决的55个发言中,有34个发言达成了一致意见。共识声明旨在定义BrM的一级和二级预防、筛查程序、症状评估、治疗效果以及预防BrM的发生和进展,同时承认日常临床实践中的可能性和局限性。一些陈述由于各种原因没有达成一致,主要是由于缺乏证据。本出版物中概述的共识声明为日常临床实践提供了参考点,并可作为临床试验程序和未来指南的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expert consensus on the prevention of brain metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

Background

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have a significant risk of developing brain metastases (BrM), which have detrimental effects on survival outcomes and quality of life. Although there are several systemic treatment options available that may delay the appearance of BrM and secondary progression of previously treated BrM, there are still substantial unmet needs for this patient population and primary prevention remains elusive.

Methods

A group of experts created consensus statements, through a modified Delphi process, to bridge the gap between current unmet needs, available evidence, and international guidelines.

Results

The steering committee reviewed all relevant literature and formed research questions to be answered by the subsequent consensus statements. In total, 61 contributors provided feedback on the consensus statements, with 34 statements reaching agreement out of the 55 statements that were voted on altogether. Statements with consensus aimed to define BrM primary and secondary prevention, screening procedures, assessment of symptoms, treatment efficacy, and preventing the occurrence and progression of BrM, while acknowledging the possibilities and limitations in daily clinical practice. Some statements did not reach agreement for a variety of reasons, mostly due to lack of evidence.

Conclusions

The consensus statements outlined in this publication provide a point of reference for daily clinical practice and can act as recommendations for clinical trial procedures and future guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Selecting systemic treatment for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the lung—current evidence and clinical implications Incomplete ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists CAR-T cell therapy for breast cancer: Current status and future perspective Dynamics of resistance to immunotherapy and TKI in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1