导师支持如何通过研究自我效能感和内在动机影响中国研究生的研究创造力?-多组分析

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101700
Shilong Li , Jinyan Huang , Shahbaz Hussain , Yaxin Dong
{"title":"导师支持如何通过研究自我效能感和内在动机影响中国研究生的研究创造力?-多组分析","authors":"Shilong Li ,&nbsp;Jinyan Huang ,&nbsp;Shahbaz Hussain ,&nbsp;Yaxin Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study utilized a structural equation modeling approach to investigate the influence of supervisor support on Chinese graduate students’ research creativity, mediated by research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. The sample comprised 1781 graduate students from 42 Chinese universities. Data were gathered using a 33-item five-point Likert scale survey to gauge perceptions of supervisor support (spanning academic, personal, and autonomy facets), research self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and research creativity. The study specifically probed how research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation acted as mediators in the relationship between the three types of supervisor support and research creativity. Additionally, potential differences in the structural equation model based on gender (male vs. female) and academic major (arts vs. sciences) were examined. Results showed that both self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation had a notable impact on research creativity. Furthermore, all three types of supervisor support exerted direct effects on research creativity. Research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation served as partial mediators between supervisor support and research creativity. No significant model differences were found between genders or academic majors. Practically, it suggests that institutions should foster supportive environments to boost students’ confidence and autonomy, leading to greater creative output.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does supervisor support impact Chinese graduate students’ research creativity through research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation? – A multi-group analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shilong Li ,&nbsp;Jinyan Huang ,&nbsp;Shahbaz Hussain ,&nbsp;Yaxin Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study utilized a structural equation modeling approach to investigate the influence of supervisor support on Chinese graduate students’ research creativity, mediated by research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. The sample comprised 1781 graduate students from 42 Chinese universities. Data were gathered using a 33-item five-point Likert scale survey to gauge perceptions of supervisor support (spanning academic, personal, and autonomy facets), research self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and research creativity. The study specifically probed how research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation acted as mediators in the relationship between the three types of supervisor support and research creativity. Additionally, potential differences in the structural equation model based on gender (male vs. female) and academic major (arts vs. sciences) were examined. Results showed that both self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation had a notable impact on research creativity. Furthermore, all three types of supervisor support exerted direct effects on research creativity. Research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation served as partial mediators between supervisor support and research creativity. No significant model differences were found between genders or academic majors. Practically, it suggests that institutions should foster supportive environments to boost students’ confidence and autonomy, leading to greater creative output.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002384\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124002384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用结构方程模型研究了导师支持在科研自我效能感和内在动机的中介作用下对中国研究生科研创造力的影响。样本包括来自中国42所大学的1781名研究生。数据收集使用33项五点李克特量表调查,以衡量对导师支持(跨越学术,个人和自主方面),研究自我效能,内在动机和研究创造力的看法。本研究具体探讨了研究自我效能感和内在动机如何在三种类型的导师支持与研究创造力之间的关系中起中介作用。此外,基于性别(男性vs女性)和学术专业(文科vs理科)的结构方程模型的潜在差异进行了检验。结果表明,自我效能感和内在动机对科研创造力均有显著影响。此外,这三种类型的导师支持都对研究创造力有直接影响。研究自我效能感和内在动机在导师支持与研究创造力之间起部分中介作用。在性别和专业之间没有发现显著的模型差异。实际上,它建议学校应该营造支持性的环境,以增强学生的信心和自主性,从而产生更大的创造性产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How does supervisor support impact Chinese graduate students’ research creativity through research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation? – A multi-group analysis
This study utilized a structural equation modeling approach to investigate the influence of supervisor support on Chinese graduate students’ research creativity, mediated by research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. The sample comprised 1781 graduate students from 42 Chinese universities. Data were gathered using a 33-item five-point Likert scale survey to gauge perceptions of supervisor support (spanning academic, personal, and autonomy facets), research self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and research creativity. The study specifically probed how research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation acted as mediators in the relationship between the three types of supervisor support and research creativity. Additionally, potential differences in the structural equation model based on gender (male vs. female) and academic major (arts vs. sciences) were examined. Results showed that both self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation had a notable impact on research creativity. Furthermore, all three types of supervisor support exerted direct effects on research creativity. Research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation served as partial mediators between supervisor support and research creativity. No significant model differences were found between genders or academic majors. Practically, it suggests that institutions should foster supportive environments to boost students’ confidence and autonomy, leading to greater creative output.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exploring the effects of scaffolded reflective learning on student teachers' design performance and reflective thinking How does supervisor support impact Chinese graduate students’ research creativity through research self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation? – A multi-group analysis Physical Education Pre-Service Teachers as Design Thinkers: Exploring the Role of Divergent and Convergent Thinking and TPACK The interactive effect of integral and incidental emotions on creative metaphor performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1