可持续转型研究与社会实践理论的交叉:系统文献综述

Martinus Franciscus Mohandas van Uden, Johannes Wilhelmus Franciscus Wamelink, Ellen Maria van Bueren, Erwin Wilhelmus Theodurus Martinus Heurkens
{"title":"可持续转型研究与社会实践理论的交叉:系统文献综述","authors":"Martinus Franciscus Mohandas van Uden,&nbsp;Johannes Wilhelmus Franciscus Wamelink,&nbsp;Ellen Maria van Bueren,&nbsp;Erwin Wilhelmus Theodurus Martinus Heurkens","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Researchers employ many different approaches to study transitions towards more sustainable futures, of which Sustainability Transitions Research and Social Practice Theory are often used. These approaches offer complementary concepts that are helpful to analyse, explain, forecast, and drive sustainability transitions, e.g. heuristics on changing institutions (Sustainability Transitions Research) or dynamics to change behaviour through practice development (Social Practice Theory). However, despite first attempts, it remains unclear how the approaches can be used together. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to expose crossover frameworks in which these approaches are used together, elaborating on conditions that make this possible, and the strengths and weaknesses of specific crossover frameworks. A systematic literature review has been conducted, investigating the potentials and the limitations for crossovers between Social Practice Theory and Sustainability Transitions Research by analysing the approaches according to the different ontologies and theories and then analysing frameworks that have been created so far. This research elaborates on six crossover frameworks that have been created that all have diverse strengths, such as the ability to conceptualize early transitional changes or finding points of resistance in transitions. All the found crossover frameworks made use of either the multilevel perspective or transition management. Other frameworks of transition research have not been found. This research shows that there has been surprisingly little research to crossover frameworks that incorporate an element of time. The exposition following from this study is interesting for researchers and policymakers working on sustainability transitions and sets an agenda for further framework development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crossovers between Sustainability Transitions Research and Social Practice Theory: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Martinus Franciscus Mohandas van Uden,&nbsp;Johannes Wilhelmus Franciscus Wamelink,&nbsp;Ellen Maria van Bueren,&nbsp;Erwin Wilhelmus Theodurus Martinus Heurkens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Researchers employ many different approaches to study transitions towards more sustainable futures, of which Sustainability Transitions Research and Social Practice Theory are often used. These approaches offer complementary concepts that are helpful to analyse, explain, forecast, and drive sustainability transitions, e.g. heuristics on changing institutions (Sustainability Transitions Research) or dynamics to change behaviour through practice development (Social Practice Theory). However, despite first attempts, it remains unclear how the approaches can be used together. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to expose crossover frameworks in which these approaches are used together, elaborating on conditions that make this possible, and the strengths and weaknesses of specific crossover frameworks. A systematic literature review has been conducted, investigating the potentials and the limitations for crossovers between Social Practice Theory and Sustainability Transitions Research by analysing the approaches according to the different ontologies and theories and then analysing frameworks that have been created so far. This research elaborates on six crossover frameworks that have been created that all have diverse strengths, such as the ability to conceptualize early transitional changes or finding points of resistance in transitions. All the found crossover frameworks made use of either the multilevel perspective or transition management. Other frameworks of transition research have not been found. This research shows that there has been surprisingly little research to crossover frameworks that incorporate an element of time. The exposition following from this study is interesting for researchers and policymakers working on sustainability transitions and sets an agenda for further framework development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Production Letters\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Production Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791624000290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791624000290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员采用了许多不同的方法来研究向更可持续未来的转变,其中可持续性转变研究和社会实践理论经常被使用。这些方法提供了互补的概念,有助于分析、解释、预测和推动可持续性转型,例如,变化制度的启发式(可持续性转型研究)或通过实践发展改变行为的动态(社会实践理论)。然而,尽管进行了首次尝试,但目前尚不清楚如何将这些方法结合起来使用。因此,本文的目的是揭示这些方法一起使用的交叉框架,详细说明使其成为可能的条件,以及特定交叉框架的优缺点。本文进行了系统的文献综述,通过分析不同本体论和理论的方法,然后分析迄今为止创建的框架,调查了社会实践理论和可持续转型研究之间交叉的潜力和局限性。本研究详细阐述了已经创建的六个跨界框架,它们都具有不同的优势,例如概念化早期过渡变化的能力或在过渡中找到阻力点的能力。所有发现的跨界框架都使用了多层透视图或转换管理。尚未发现其他的过渡研究框架。这项研究表明,对于包含时间元素的跨界框架的研究少得惊人。本研究的后续阐述对于致力于可持续转型的研究人员和政策制定者来说很有趣,并为进一步的框架开发设定了议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crossovers between Sustainability Transitions Research and Social Practice Theory: A Systematic Literature Review
Researchers employ many different approaches to study transitions towards more sustainable futures, of which Sustainability Transitions Research and Social Practice Theory are often used. These approaches offer complementary concepts that are helpful to analyse, explain, forecast, and drive sustainability transitions, e.g. heuristics on changing institutions (Sustainability Transitions Research) or dynamics to change behaviour through practice development (Social Practice Theory). However, despite first attempts, it remains unclear how the approaches can be used together. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to expose crossover frameworks in which these approaches are used together, elaborating on conditions that make this possible, and the strengths and weaknesses of specific crossover frameworks. A systematic literature review has been conducted, investigating the potentials and the limitations for crossovers between Social Practice Theory and Sustainability Transitions Research by analysing the approaches according to the different ontologies and theories and then analysing frameworks that have been created so far. This research elaborates on six crossover frameworks that have been created that all have diverse strengths, such as the ability to conceptualize early transitional changes or finding points of resistance in transitions. All the found crossover frameworks made use of either the multilevel perspective or transition management. Other frameworks of transition research have not been found. This research shows that there has been surprisingly little research to crossover frameworks that incorporate an element of time. The exposition following from this study is interesting for researchers and policymakers working on sustainability transitions and sets an agenda for further framework development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biophilic Quality Matrix: A tool to evaluate the biophilic quality of a building during early design stage Resident action in smart waste management during landfill disclosure transition: Insights from Yogyakarta's smart city initiatives The sustainability of agricultural trade: The case of South Africa From insight to action: Possible pathways for sustainable futures in a Canadian university Digital product passports for electric vehicle batteries: Stakeholder requirements for sustainability and circularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1