骨骼系统异常胎儿产前外显子组测序的增量产量:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1111/aogs.15025
Yan Wang, Yuan Lv, Jia Yao, Hao Ding, Gang Li, Jianmin Li, Lizhu Chen
{"title":"骨骼系统异常胎儿产前外显子组测序的增量产量:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yan Wang, Yuan Lv, Jia Yao, Hao Ding, Gang Li, Jianmin Li, Lizhu Chen","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fetal skeletal abnormalities can be caused by various factors and genetic cause plays an important role. Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) has been shown to be a powerful approach for accurate prenatal molecular diagnoses. Diagnostic yield of ES in fetal skeletal abnormalities varies significantly across studies. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to assess the incremental yield of ES in fetuses with different kinds of skeletal abnormalities and a negative result on chromosome microarray or karyotyping.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to November 26, 2022. Relevant data were collected from observational studies containing five or more cases of skeletal abnormalities who underwent ES. The incremental yield of ES was evaluated by single proportion analysis and 95% confidence interval (CI), both according to the article features and individual phenotypes. This study was registered on PROSPERO as CRD42022382800.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies including 524 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incremental yield was 60.2% (95% CI, 53.4%-66.9%) for all fetuses with skeletal abnormalities. In subgroup analysis, the additional diagnostic yield was 83.9% (95% CI, 76.4%-90.4%) in isolated dysplasia cases (group I), 52.0% (95% CI, 32.9%-70.9%) in dysplasia with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group II), 33.3% (95% CI, 19.3%-48.6%) in isolate dysostoses cases (group III), 47.8% (95 % CI, 35.8%-60.0%) in dysostoses with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group IV), 83.0% (95% CI, 63.7%-97.1%) in combination of the two phenotypes without non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group V), 74.5% (95% CI, 54.9%-90.9%) in combination of the two phenotypes with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group VI). The origin of the pathogenic variations differed among the groups. Most causative variants were de novo in groups I (97/133, 72.9%), V (14/23, 60.9%), and VI (15/26, 57.7%). Meanwhile, pathogenic variations in III (18/25, 72.0%) and IV (37/67, 55.2%) were more often inherited from a parent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ES had a favorable incremental yield in fetuses with skeletal abnormalities. The common pathogenic variations and genetic patterns of skeletal abnormalities vary among different subtypes. Interpreting this difference is beneficial for personalized clinical consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incremental yield of prenatal exome sequencing in fetuses with skeletal system abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Wang, Yuan Lv, Jia Yao, Hao Ding, Gang Li, Jianmin Li, Lizhu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.15025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fetal skeletal abnormalities can be caused by various factors and genetic cause plays an important role. Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) has been shown to be a powerful approach for accurate prenatal molecular diagnoses. Diagnostic yield of ES in fetal skeletal abnormalities varies significantly across studies. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to assess the incremental yield of ES in fetuses with different kinds of skeletal abnormalities and a negative result on chromosome microarray or karyotyping.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to November 26, 2022. Relevant data were collected from observational studies containing five or more cases of skeletal abnormalities who underwent ES. The incremental yield of ES was evaluated by single proportion analysis and 95% confidence interval (CI), both according to the article features and individual phenotypes. This study was registered on PROSPERO as CRD42022382800.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies including 524 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incremental yield was 60.2% (95% CI, 53.4%-66.9%) for all fetuses with skeletal abnormalities. In subgroup analysis, the additional diagnostic yield was 83.9% (95% CI, 76.4%-90.4%) in isolated dysplasia cases (group I), 52.0% (95% CI, 32.9%-70.9%) in dysplasia with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group II), 33.3% (95% CI, 19.3%-48.6%) in isolate dysostoses cases (group III), 47.8% (95 % CI, 35.8%-60.0%) in dysostoses with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group IV), 83.0% (95% CI, 63.7%-97.1%) in combination of the two phenotypes without non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group V), 74.5% (95% CI, 54.9%-90.9%) in combination of the two phenotypes with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group VI). The origin of the pathogenic variations differed among the groups. Most causative variants were de novo in groups I (97/133, 72.9%), V (14/23, 60.9%), and VI (15/26, 57.7%). Meanwhile, pathogenic variations in III (18/25, 72.0%) and IV (37/67, 55.2%) were more often inherited from a parent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ES had a favorable incremental yield in fetuses with skeletal abnormalities. The common pathogenic variations and genetic patterns of skeletal abnormalities vary among different subtypes. Interpreting this difference is beneficial for personalized clinical consultation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胎儿骨骼异常可由多种因素引起,遗传因素起着重要作用。产前外显子组测序(ES)已被证明是准确产前分子诊断的有力方法。ES在胎儿骨骼异常中的诊断率在不同的研究中差异很大。本研究旨在对文献进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估具有不同类型骨骼异常和染色体微阵列或核型阴性结果的胎儿的ES增量产量。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,截止到2022年11月26日。相关数据收集自观察性研究,包括5例或更多的骨骼异常病例,他们接受了ES。根据文章特征和个体表型,采用单比例分析和95%置信区间(CI)评估ES的增量产量。本研究在PROSPERO上注册为CRD42022382800。结果:26项研究524人符合纳入标准。所有骨骼异常胎儿的总增量产出率为60.2% (95% CI, 53.4%-66.9%)。在亚组分析中,单独发育不良病例(I组)的额外诊断率为83.9% (95% CI, 76.4% ~ 90.4%),发育不良伴非骨骼异常病例(II组)的额外诊断率为52.0% (95% CI, 32.9% ~ 70.9%),单独发育不良病例(III组)的额外诊断率为33.3% (95% CI, 19.3% ~ 48.6%),发育不良伴非骨骼异常病例(IV组)的额外诊断率为47.8% (95% CI, 35.8% ~ 60.0%),两种表型合并无非骨骼异常病例(V组)的额外诊断率为83.0% (95% CI, 63.7% ~ 97.1%)。74.5% (95% CI, 54.9%-90.9%)的两种表型合并非骨骼异常病例(VI组)。组间致病变异的起源不同。在I组(97/133,72.9%)、V组(14/23,60.9%)和VI组(15/26,57.7%)中,大多数致病变异是从头开始的。III型(18/25,72.0%)和IV型(37/67,55.2%)的致病变异多为亲本遗传。结论:ES在骨骼异常胎儿中具有良好的增量产率。骨骼异常的常见致病变异和遗传模式在不同亚型中有所不同。解释这种差异有利于个性化的临床咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incremental yield of prenatal exome sequencing in fetuses with skeletal system abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Fetal skeletal abnormalities can be caused by various factors and genetic cause plays an important role. Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) has been shown to be a powerful approach for accurate prenatal molecular diagnoses. Diagnostic yield of ES in fetal skeletal abnormalities varies significantly across studies. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to assess the incremental yield of ES in fetuses with different kinds of skeletal abnormalities and a negative result on chromosome microarray or karyotyping.

Material and methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to November 26, 2022. Relevant data were collected from observational studies containing five or more cases of skeletal abnormalities who underwent ES. The incremental yield of ES was evaluated by single proportion analysis and 95% confidence interval (CI), both according to the article features and individual phenotypes. This study was registered on PROSPERO as CRD42022382800.

Results: Twenty-six studies including 524 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incremental yield was 60.2% (95% CI, 53.4%-66.9%) for all fetuses with skeletal abnormalities. In subgroup analysis, the additional diagnostic yield was 83.9% (95% CI, 76.4%-90.4%) in isolated dysplasia cases (group I), 52.0% (95% CI, 32.9%-70.9%) in dysplasia with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group II), 33.3% (95% CI, 19.3%-48.6%) in isolate dysostoses cases (group III), 47.8% (95 % CI, 35.8%-60.0%) in dysostoses with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group IV), 83.0% (95% CI, 63.7%-97.1%) in combination of the two phenotypes without non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group V), 74.5% (95% CI, 54.9%-90.9%) in combination of the two phenotypes with non-skeletal abnormalities cases (group VI). The origin of the pathogenic variations differed among the groups. Most causative variants were de novo in groups I (97/133, 72.9%), V (14/23, 60.9%), and VI (15/26, 57.7%). Meanwhile, pathogenic variations in III (18/25, 72.0%) and IV (37/67, 55.2%) were more often inherited from a parent.

Conclusions: ES had a favorable incremental yield in fetuses with skeletal abnormalities. The common pathogenic variations and genetic patterns of skeletal abnormalities vary among different subtypes. Interpreting this difference is beneficial for personalized clinical consultation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Association of oral contraceptives and risk of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal rotation examined with ultrasound. Reframing spontaneous preterm birth as a preventable adverse outcome-A clinical audit of a preventative toolbox. A comparison of the treatment outcome of Asherman's syndrome which developed within and outside the puerperal period: A matched cohort study. A decade of human uterus transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1