使用媒体健康声明向医疗保健学生教授循证实践的经验:一项混合方法研究。

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.146648.2
Ida-Kristin Orjasaeter Elvsaas, Hilde Tinderholt Myrhaug, Lisa Garnweidner-Holme, Jürgen Kasper, Astrid Dahlgren, Marianne Molin
{"title":"使用媒体健康声明向医疗保健学生教授循证实践的经验:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Ida-Kristin Orjasaeter Elvsaas, Hilde Tinderholt Myrhaug, Lisa Garnweidner-Holme, Jürgen Kasper, Astrid Dahlgren, Marianne Molin","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.146648.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A multifaceted and interactive teaching approach is recommended for achieving proficiency in evidence-based practice, with critical thinking considered vital for connecting theory and practice. In this context, we advocate the strategic use of health claims in media to promote critical thinking and provide an accessible entry point to evidence-based practice for early-stage university healthcare students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a convergent mixed methods study, including a cross-sectional survey with structured and open-ended questions as well as focus group interviews, at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, during the 2020-2021 academic year. Participants were bachelor's students in bioengineering, physiotherapy, social education, and occupational therapy. We employed a blended learning approach, combining digital learning resources, teaching in critical assessment of health claims and evidence-based practice, and a concurrent group exam assignment centered around health news. The outcome measures included students' experiences integrating health claims into evidence-based practice teaching and their experiences with teaching approaches, including the group exam.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 446 participants, 136 (30.5%) responded to the structured questions in the survey. In response to the open-ended questions within the survey, 109 (80.1%) of the respondents shared positive experiences about the course, while 98 (72%) suggested improvements. Additionally, 25 students participated in focus group interviews. Synthesizing the results, we found that students viewed the inclusion of health claim assessment as a useful entry point for learning evidence-based practice. In addition, both the blended learning design and the group exam were identified as contributors to a positive perception of learning outcomes from the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating critical reflection on media health claims into evidence-based practice education, alongside a blended learning approach and a group exam, may be beneficial for educating bachelor's healthcare students. However, further rigorous study designs are needed to assess the effect of the course on learning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6985449.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences Using Media Health Claims to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Healthcare Students: A Mixed Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ida-Kristin Orjasaeter Elvsaas, Hilde Tinderholt Myrhaug, Lisa Garnweidner-Holme, Jürgen Kasper, Astrid Dahlgren, Marianne Molin\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.146648.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A multifaceted and interactive teaching approach is recommended for achieving proficiency in evidence-based practice, with critical thinking considered vital for connecting theory and practice. In this context, we advocate the strategic use of health claims in media to promote critical thinking and provide an accessible entry point to evidence-based practice for early-stage university healthcare students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a convergent mixed methods study, including a cross-sectional survey with structured and open-ended questions as well as focus group interviews, at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, during the 2020-2021 academic year. Participants were bachelor's students in bioengineering, physiotherapy, social education, and occupational therapy. We employed a blended learning approach, combining digital learning resources, teaching in critical assessment of health claims and evidence-based practice, and a concurrent group exam assignment centered around health news. The outcome measures included students' experiences integrating health claims into evidence-based practice teaching and their experiences with teaching approaches, including the group exam.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 446 participants, 136 (30.5%) responded to the structured questions in the survey. In response to the open-ended questions within the survey, 109 (80.1%) of the respondents shared positive experiences about the course, while 98 (72%) suggested improvements. Additionally, 25 students participated in focus group interviews. Synthesizing the results, we found that students viewed the inclusion of health claim assessment as a useful entry point for learning evidence-based practice. In addition, both the blended learning design and the group exam were identified as contributors to a positive perception of learning outcomes from the course.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating critical reflection on media health claims into evidence-based practice education, alongside a blended learning approach and a group exam, may be beneficial for educating bachelor's healthcare students. However, further rigorous study designs are needed to assess the effect of the course on learning outcomes.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6985449.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146648.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146648.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了熟练掌握以证据为基础的实践,建议采用多方面和互动的教学方法,批判性思维对于联系理论和实践至关重要。在这种情况下,我们提倡在媒体上战略性地使用健康宣传来促进批判性思维,并辅以混合学习方法和小组考试。方法:我们于2020-2021学年在奥斯陆城市大学进行了一项融合混合方法研究,包括结构化和开放式问题的横断面调查以及焦点小组访谈。参与者为医疗保健专业的本科学生。我们采用了混合学习方法,将数字学习资源、健康声明的关键评估和基于证据的实践教学以及以媒体健康声明为中心的并行小组考试作业相结合。结果测量包括学生将健康声明融入循证实践教学的经历,以及他们对教学方法和小组考试的经历。结果:在465名参与者中,136人(29.2%)回答了调查中的结构化问题。在回答调查中的开放式问题时,109名(80.1%)受访者分享了对课程的积极体验,而98名(72%)受访者提出了改进意见。此外,25名学生参加了焦点小组访谈。综合结果,我们发现学生将健康声明评估视为学习循证实践的有用切入点。此外,学生们认为混合学习设计和小组考试都是对课程学习成果的积极感知的贡献者。结论:基于学生的反馈,将对媒体健康声明的批判性反思融入循证实践教育,同时采用混合学习方法和小组考试,可能有利于向本科医疗保健学生教授循证实践。然而,需要进一步严格的研究设计来客观地评估课程对学习成果的影响。注册:DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6985449。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences Using Media Health Claims to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Healthcare Students: A Mixed Methods Study.

Background: A multifaceted and interactive teaching approach is recommended for achieving proficiency in evidence-based practice, with critical thinking considered vital for connecting theory and practice. In this context, we advocate the strategic use of health claims in media to promote critical thinking and provide an accessible entry point to evidence-based practice for early-stage university healthcare students.

Method: We conducted a convergent mixed methods study, including a cross-sectional survey with structured and open-ended questions as well as focus group interviews, at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, during the 2020-2021 academic year. Participants were bachelor's students in bioengineering, physiotherapy, social education, and occupational therapy. We employed a blended learning approach, combining digital learning resources, teaching in critical assessment of health claims and evidence-based practice, and a concurrent group exam assignment centered around health news. The outcome measures included students' experiences integrating health claims into evidence-based practice teaching and their experiences with teaching approaches, including the group exam.

Results: Out of 446 participants, 136 (30.5%) responded to the structured questions in the survey. In response to the open-ended questions within the survey, 109 (80.1%) of the respondents shared positive experiences about the course, while 98 (72%) suggested improvements. Additionally, 25 students participated in focus group interviews. Synthesizing the results, we found that students viewed the inclusion of health claim assessment as a useful entry point for learning evidence-based practice. In addition, both the blended learning design and the group exam were identified as contributors to a positive perception of learning outcomes from the course.

Conclusions: Integrating critical reflection on media health claims into evidence-based practice education, alongside a blended learning approach and a group exam, may be beneficial for educating bachelor's healthcare students. However, further rigorous study designs are needed to assess the effect of the course on learning outcomes.

Registration: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6985449.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
期刊最新文献
Biological properties of Moringa oleifera: A systematic review of the last decade. Experiences Using Media Health Claims to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Healthcare Students: A Mixed Methods Study. Impact of distress and anxiety due to COVID-19 on digital addictions in university students in the third wave period . A reference genome for the eastern bettong ( Bettongia gaimardi). A systematic review of Streptococcus Mutans and Veillonellae species interactions in dental caries progression: Positive or Negative impact?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1