通过将患者报告的结果措施与国际功能、残疾和健康分类联系起来,确定癌症幸存者未满足的需求。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09019-8
Margherita Schiavi, Stefania Costi, Irene Barbieri, Luca Ghirotto, Stefania Fugazzaro, Barbara Bressi, Sara Paltrinieri, Stefano Luminari, Angela Contri
{"title":"通过将患者报告的结果措施与国际功能、残疾和健康分类联系起来,确定癌症幸存者未满足的需求。","authors":"Margherita Schiavi, Stefania Costi, Irene Barbieri, Luca Ghirotto, Stefania Fugazzaro, Barbara Bressi, Sara Paltrinieri, Stefano Luminari, Angela Contri","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09019-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Advances in cancer detection and treatment have extended cancer survivors' (CSs) life expectancy, but their evolving health needs remain unmet. This study analyzes 14 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for CSs with non-cutaneous cancers using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. These 14 PROMs are derived from a recent review focusing on the implementation of the routine assessment of unmet needs in cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each PROM was examined for correspondence to ICF health and functioning dimensions. Two independent reviewers extracted meaningful concepts from each PROM item, linking them to ICF categories. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third expert reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PROMs varied in ICF component correspondence, with \"Activities and Participation\" (37.2%) and \"Environmental Factors\" (31.8%) most frequently represented, highlighting their significance. \"Body Structures\" (1%) received minimal attention, suggesting its limited relevance to CSs' needs. The results of the linking process show the differences between the various PROMs: Candi and eHNA were primarily linked to \"Body Function\" (53.4% and 51.4%, respectively), NEQ and SUN to \"Activities and Participation,\" and CaSUN and PNI to \"Environmental Factors\" (51.7% and 50%, respectively), while eHNA had the highest percentage of items linked to \"Body Structures\" (8.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This evaluation of PROMs enhances the understanding of CSs' diverse needs so as to address them, thereby improving these individuals' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>The study underscores the importance of addressing \"Activities and Participation\" and \"Environmental Factors\" in PROMs for CSs. These insights support developing comprehensive PROMs and help healthcare providers prioritize critical areas of survivorship care, ultimately enhancing CSs' well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"835"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying unmet needs in cancer survivorship by linking patient-reported outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.\",\"authors\":\"Margherita Schiavi, Stefania Costi, Irene Barbieri, Luca Ghirotto, Stefania Fugazzaro, Barbara Bressi, Sara Paltrinieri, Stefano Luminari, Angela Contri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-024-09019-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Advances in cancer detection and treatment have extended cancer survivors' (CSs) life expectancy, but their evolving health needs remain unmet. This study analyzes 14 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for CSs with non-cutaneous cancers using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. These 14 PROMs are derived from a recent review focusing on the implementation of the routine assessment of unmet needs in cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each PROM was examined for correspondence to ICF health and functioning dimensions. Two independent reviewers extracted meaningful concepts from each PROM item, linking them to ICF categories. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third expert reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PROMs varied in ICF component correspondence, with \\\"Activities and Participation\\\" (37.2%) and \\\"Environmental Factors\\\" (31.8%) most frequently represented, highlighting their significance. \\\"Body Structures\\\" (1%) received minimal attention, suggesting its limited relevance to CSs' needs. The results of the linking process show the differences between the various PROMs: Candi and eHNA were primarily linked to \\\"Body Function\\\" (53.4% and 51.4%, respectively), NEQ and SUN to \\\"Activities and Participation,\\\" and CaSUN and PNI to \\\"Environmental Factors\\\" (51.7% and 50%, respectively), while eHNA had the highest percentage of items linked to \\\"Body Structures\\\" (8.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This evaluation of PROMs enhances the understanding of CSs' diverse needs so as to address them, thereby improving these individuals' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>The study underscores the importance of addressing \\\"Activities and Participation\\\" and \\\"Environmental Factors\\\" in PROMs for CSs. These insights support developing comprehensive PROMs and help healthcare providers prioritize critical areas of survivorship care, ultimately enhancing CSs' well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"32 12\",\"pages\":\"835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606983/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09019-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09019-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癌症检测和治疗的进步延长了癌症幸存者的预期寿命,但他们不断变化的健康需求仍未得到满足。本研究使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架分析了14例伴有非皮肤癌的CSs患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。这14个PROMs来源于最近的一项综述,重点是对癌症幸存者未满足需求的常规评估的实施。方法:检查每个PROM与ICF健康和功能维度的对应关系。两个独立的审稿人从每个PROM项目中提取有意义的概念,并将它们与ICF类别联系起来。通过与第三位专家审稿人讨论解决差异。结果:PROMs的ICF成分对应关系各不相同,“活动和参与”(37.2%)和“环境因素”(31.8%)最常见,突出了它们的重要性。“身体结构”(1%)得到的关注最少,这表明它与CSs需求的相关性有限。链接过程的结果显示了各种PROMs之间的差异:Candi和eHNA主要与“身体功能”相关(分别为53.4%和51.4%),NEQ和SUN与“活动和参与”相关,CaSUN和PNI与“环境因素”相关(分别为51.7%和50%),而eHNA与“身体结构”相关的项目比例最高(8.1%)。结论:该评价增强了对社会保障人员多样化需求的理解,从而解决这些需求,从而改善这些个体的生活质量。对癌症幸存者的影响:该研究强调了解决“活动和参与”以及“环境因素”对CSs prom的重要性。这些见解支持开发全面的prom,并帮助医疗保健提供者优先考虑生存护理的关键领域,最终提高CSs的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying unmet needs in cancer survivorship by linking patient-reported outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Purpose: Advances in cancer detection and treatment have extended cancer survivors' (CSs) life expectancy, but their evolving health needs remain unmet. This study analyzes 14 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for CSs with non-cutaneous cancers using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. These 14 PROMs are derived from a recent review focusing on the implementation of the routine assessment of unmet needs in cancer survivors.

Methods: Each PROM was examined for correspondence to ICF health and functioning dimensions. Two independent reviewers extracted meaningful concepts from each PROM item, linking them to ICF categories. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third expert reviewer.

Results: PROMs varied in ICF component correspondence, with "Activities and Participation" (37.2%) and "Environmental Factors" (31.8%) most frequently represented, highlighting their significance. "Body Structures" (1%) received minimal attention, suggesting its limited relevance to CSs' needs. The results of the linking process show the differences between the various PROMs: Candi and eHNA were primarily linked to "Body Function" (53.4% and 51.4%, respectively), NEQ and SUN to "Activities and Participation," and CaSUN and PNI to "Environmental Factors" (51.7% and 50%, respectively), while eHNA had the highest percentage of items linked to "Body Structures" (8.1%).

Conclusions: This evaluation of PROMs enhances the understanding of CSs' diverse needs so as to address them, thereby improving these individuals' quality of life.

Implications for cancer survivors: The study underscores the importance of addressing "Activities and Participation" and "Environmental Factors" in PROMs for CSs. These insights support developing comprehensive PROMs and help healthcare providers prioritize critical areas of survivorship care, ultimately enhancing CSs' well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of fatigue and mental health in sexual and gender minority cancer survivors. Exploring the network structure and lived experiences of preoperative fear in patients with esophageal cancer: a convergent mixed-methods study. From loss to meaning: therapeutic group processes in parental grief after pediatric cancer. Substance use monitoring in supportive oncology: surveillance is not a clinical outcome, and policing is not a therapeutic framework. The effect of cancer response style on anxiety and depression levels in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1