肿瘤患者家庭肠外营养的护理质量。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09011-2
Andrea Schneider, Christina Baur, Yurdagül Zopf, Helga Paula Török, Christian Sina, Christian Prinz, Heike Mönnich, Ahmed Madisch, Susen Maluck-Schölecke, Ingeborg Rötzer, Claudia Seipt, Anja Götte, Justinus Beer, Elke Jäger
{"title":"肿瘤患者家庭肠外营养的护理质量。","authors":"Andrea Schneider, Christina Baur, Yurdagül Zopf, Helga Paula Török, Christian Sina, Christian Prinz, Heike Mönnich, Ahmed Madisch, Susen Maluck-Schölecke, Ingeborg Rötzer, Claudia Seipt, Anja Götte, Justinus Beer, Elke Jäger","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09011-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transferring adult cancer patients from the hospital to the home environment for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) can be challenging. There is limited real-world data on how those affected perceive this situation. Our aim was to assess the quality of life (QoL) on HPN and the benefits and burdens from the cancer patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study from Germany examined the QoL on HPN on the basis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - G questionnaire (FACT-G). The benefits and burdens of HPN were assessed using predefined questions and answers tailored to the situation of this patient group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>139 adults with advanced solid tumors in a palliative setting at 10 hospitals in Germany were eligible for the study. The follow-up was 12 weeks. At week 4, the Least-square (LS) mean (95% CI) change from baseline in the total FACT-G score was 0.9 (-2.4; 4.2) points, indicating QoL stability. HPN was associated with few complications, with a low rate of hospital readmission due to catheter-related issues (3.8%; n = 5). In the patient assessment of the benefits of HPN, the LS mean values at Week 4 ranged between 7.6 and 8.5 on a 10-point Likert scale. The most commonly perceived burden was \"restricted mobility\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With thorough preparation for home parenteral nutrition, the transition from hospital to home care environment works well. QoL is largely maintained through HPN, and cancer patients perceive this situation as not or minimally burdensome alongside their underlying disease, although many patients found the limited mobility to be a burden.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03425435 / Date of registration: February 01, 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"834"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of care of oncological patients with home parenteral nutrition.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Schneider, Christina Baur, Yurdagül Zopf, Helga Paula Török, Christian Sina, Christian Prinz, Heike Mönnich, Ahmed Madisch, Susen Maluck-Schölecke, Ingeborg Rötzer, Claudia Seipt, Anja Götte, Justinus Beer, Elke Jäger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-024-09011-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transferring adult cancer patients from the hospital to the home environment for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) can be challenging. There is limited real-world data on how those affected perceive this situation. Our aim was to assess the quality of life (QoL) on HPN and the benefits and burdens from the cancer patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study from Germany examined the QoL on HPN on the basis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - G questionnaire (FACT-G). The benefits and burdens of HPN were assessed using predefined questions and answers tailored to the situation of this patient group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>139 adults with advanced solid tumors in a palliative setting at 10 hospitals in Germany were eligible for the study. The follow-up was 12 weeks. At week 4, the Least-square (LS) mean (95% CI) change from baseline in the total FACT-G score was 0.9 (-2.4; 4.2) points, indicating QoL stability. HPN was associated with few complications, with a low rate of hospital readmission due to catheter-related issues (3.8%; n = 5). In the patient assessment of the benefits of HPN, the LS mean values at Week 4 ranged between 7.6 and 8.5 on a 10-point Likert scale. The most commonly perceived burden was \\\"restricted mobility\\\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With thorough preparation for home parenteral nutrition, the transition from hospital to home care environment works well. QoL is largely maintained through HPN, and cancer patients perceive this situation as not or minimally burdensome alongside their underlying disease, although many patients found the limited mobility to be a burden.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03425435 / Date of registration: February 01, 2018.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"32 12\",\"pages\":\"834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607128/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09011-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09011-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:将成年癌症患者从医院转移到家庭环境中进行家庭肠外营养(HPN)可能具有挑战性。关于受影响的人如何看待这种情况的真实数据有限。我们的目的是从癌症患者的角度评估HPN的生活质量(QoL)以及获益和负担。方法:这项来自德国的观察性研究在癌症治疗功能评估-G问卷(FACT-G)的基础上检查了HPN的生活质量。HPN的好处和负担是根据该患者组的情况使用预先定义的问题和答案来评估的。结果:139名在德国10家医院接受姑息治疗的晚期实体瘤成人符合研究条件。随访12周。在第4周,总FACT-G评分与基线相比的最小二乘(LS)平均值(95% CI)变化为0.9 (-2.4;4.2)分,表示生活质量的稳定性。HPN与并发症相关较少,因导管相关问题再入院率低(3.8%;n = 5)。在患者对HPN益处的评估中,第4周的LS平均值在10分李克特量表上介于7.6和8.5之间。最常见的负担是“行动受限”。结论:家庭肠外营养准备充分,从医院到家庭护理环境的转变效果良好。生活质量在很大程度上是通过HPN维持的,癌症患者认为这种情况与他们的潜在疾病相比没有或最低限度的负担,尽管许多患者发现有限的活动能力是一种负担。试验注册号:NCT03425435 /注册日期:2018年2月1日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of care of oncological patients with home parenteral nutrition.

Purpose: Transferring adult cancer patients from the hospital to the home environment for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) can be challenging. There is limited real-world data on how those affected perceive this situation. Our aim was to assess the quality of life (QoL) on HPN and the benefits and burdens from the cancer patient's perspective.

Methods: This observational study from Germany examined the QoL on HPN on the basis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - G questionnaire (FACT-G). The benefits and burdens of HPN were assessed using predefined questions and answers tailored to the situation of this patient group.

Results: 139 adults with advanced solid tumors in a palliative setting at 10 hospitals in Germany were eligible for the study. The follow-up was 12 weeks. At week 4, the Least-square (LS) mean (95% CI) change from baseline in the total FACT-G score was 0.9 (-2.4; 4.2) points, indicating QoL stability. HPN was associated with few complications, with a low rate of hospital readmission due to catheter-related issues (3.8%; n = 5). In the patient assessment of the benefits of HPN, the LS mean values at Week 4 ranged between 7.6 and 8.5 on a 10-point Likert scale. The most commonly perceived burden was "restricted mobility".

Conclusion: With thorough preparation for home parenteral nutrition, the transition from hospital to home care environment works well. QoL is largely maintained through HPN, and cancer patients perceive this situation as not or minimally burdensome alongside their underlying disease, although many patients found the limited mobility to be a burden.

Trial registration number: NCT03425435 / Date of registration: February 01, 2018.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative analysis of cancer patients' views on facilitators and barriers for the implementation of oncological exercise therapy. Prophylactic vs. reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis of survival and supportive care outcomes. How do mothers with advanced cancer experience anxiety about present and future of their children aged 6-12 years: a phenomenological interview study. Should supportive care be started before initiating cancer treatment? Exercise for myeloma patients with bone disease: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1