腹腔镜腹部手术中低剂量鞘内吗啡的镇痛效果评价:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.4103/jmas.jmas_141_24
Lakshmi Kumar, Ramya Anantharaman, Dimple Elina Thomas, Anjaly S Nair, Anandajith P Kartha, Karthik Kumar
{"title":"腹腔镜腹部手术中低剂量鞘内吗啡的镇痛效果评价:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Lakshmi Kumar, Ramya Anantharaman, Dimple Elina Thomas, Anjaly S Nair, Anandajith P Kartha, Karthik Kumar","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_141_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intrathecal opioid is an analgesic option in laparoscopic surgery. We assessed primarily the intraoperative opioid requirement amongst patients receiving intrathecal morphine (ITM) (Group M) versus standard care (Group C) for abdominal surgery. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative haemodynamic changes, extubation on table and pain scores in the intensive care unit (ICU) at 6 th hourly intervals for 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery were randomised into Group M ( n = 30) that received ITM at 2 μg/kg while Group C ( n = 30) was control. A rise in mean arterial pressure > 20% from baseline was treated sequentially with 0.3 mg /kg propofol and 0.5 μg/kg fentanyl intravenously (IV). Pain management in the ICU included paracetamol 1G IV 8 th hourly for all patients, while nefopam 20 mg and fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg IV were the second and third tiers of pain management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperatively, 10 patients in Group M versus 26 in Group C needed additional fentanyl ( P < 0.001) and 15 versus 26 patients needed additional propofol ( P = 0.0024). Pain scores were superior in Group M at all time points in the ICU and at ambulation and during incentive spirometry. Thirteen patients in Group C versus 3 in Group M needed nefopam at the time of shifting to the ICU ( P = 0.004) and 10 patients versus 1 at 8 h in the ICU ( P = 0.003) while pain management at 16 h and 24 h was comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-operative ITM at 2 μg/kg reduces intraoperative opioid requirement and improves analgesia 24 h postoperatively amongst patients undergoing major laparoscopic abdominal surgery without delay in extubation or changes in haemodynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of a low dose of intrathecal morphine in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A randomised control trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lakshmi Kumar, Ramya Anantharaman, Dimple Elina Thomas, Anjaly S Nair, Anandajith P Kartha, Karthik Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmas.jmas_141_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intrathecal opioid is an analgesic option in laparoscopic surgery. We assessed primarily the intraoperative opioid requirement amongst patients receiving intrathecal morphine (ITM) (Group M) versus standard care (Group C) for abdominal surgery. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative haemodynamic changes, extubation on table and pain scores in the intensive care unit (ICU) at 6 th hourly intervals for 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery were randomised into Group M ( n = 30) that received ITM at 2 μg/kg while Group C ( n = 30) was control. A rise in mean arterial pressure > 20% from baseline was treated sequentially with 0.3 mg /kg propofol and 0.5 μg/kg fentanyl intravenously (IV). Pain management in the ICU included paracetamol 1G IV 8 th hourly for all patients, while nefopam 20 mg and fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg IV were the second and third tiers of pain management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperatively, 10 patients in Group M versus 26 in Group C needed additional fentanyl ( P < 0.001) and 15 versus 26 patients needed additional propofol ( P = 0.0024). Pain scores were superior in Group M at all time points in the ICU and at ambulation and during incentive spirometry. Thirteen patients in Group C versus 3 in Group M needed nefopam at the time of shifting to the ICU ( P = 0.004) and 10 patients versus 1 at 8 h in the ICU ( P = 0.003) while pain management at 16 h and 24 h was comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-operative ITM at 2 μg/kg reduces intraoperative opioid requirement and improves analgesia 24 h postoperatively amongst patients undergoing major laparoscopic abdominal surgery without delay in extubation or changes in haemodynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_141_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_141_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鞘内阿片类药物是腹腔镜手术的一种镇痛选择。我们主要评估了接受鞘内吗啡(ITM) (M组)和标准治疗(C组)腹部手术患者术中阿片类药物的需求。次要结果为术中血流动力学变化、拔管表及术后24 h重症监护病房(ICU)疼痛评分(间隔6小时)。患者与方法:将腹腔镜腹部手术患者随机分为M组(n = 30)和C组(n = 30), M组给予2 μg/kg剂量的ITM。平均动脉压较基线升高20%后,依次给予0.3 mg /kg异丙酚和0.5 μg/kg芬太尼静脉注射(IV)。ICU的疼痛管理包括所有患者第8小时给予扑热息痛1G IV,而尼福泮20 mg和芬太尼0.5 μg/kg IV为第二级和第三级疼痛管理。结果:术中,M组10例患者需要额外添加芬太尼(P < 0.001), C组26例患者需要额外添加异丙酚(P = 0.0024)。M组患者在ICU的所有时间点、下床时和激励性肺活量测定时的疼痛评分均优于对照组。C组13例患者在转入ICU时需要使用奈福泮(P = 0.004), M组3例患者在ICU 8 h时需要使用奈福泮(P = 0.003),而16 h和24 h时的疼痛管理具有可比性。结论:术前剂量为2 μg/kg的ITM可减少腹腔镜腹部大手术患者术中阿片类药物需求,改善术后24 h的镇痛效果,且无拔管延迟或血流动力学改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of a low dose of intrathecal morphine in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A randomised control trial.

Introduction: Intrathecal opioid is an analgesic option in laparoscopic surgery. We assessed primarily the intraoperative opioid requirement amongst patients receiving intrathecal morphine (ITM) (Group M) versus standard care (Group C) for abdominal surgery. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative haemodynamic changes, extubation on table and pain scores in the intensive care unit (ICU) at 6 th hourly intervals for 24 h postoperatively.

Patients and methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery were randomised into Group M ( n = 30) that received ITM at 2 μg/kg while Group C ( n = 30) was control. A rise in mean arterial pressure > 20% from baseline was treated sequentially with 0.3 mg /kg propofol and 0.5 μg/kg fentanyl intravenously (IV). Pain management in the ICU included paracetamol 1G IV 8 th hourly for all patients, while nefopam 20 mg and fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg IV were the second and third tiers of pain management.

Results: Intraoperatively, 10 patients in Group M versus 26 in Group C needed additional fentanyl ( P < 0.001) and 15 versus 26 patients needed additional propofol ( P = 0.0024). Pain scores were superior in Group M at all time points in the ICU and at ambulation and during incentive spirometry. Thirteen patients in Group C versus 3 in Group M needed nefopam at the time of shifting to the ICU ( P = 0.004) and 10 patients versus 1 at 8 h in the ICU ( P = 0.003) while pain management at 16 h and 24 h was comparable.

Conclusion: Pre-operative ITM at 2 μg/kg reduces intraoperative opioid requirement and improves analgesia 24 h postoperatively amongst patients undergoing major laparoscopic abdominal surgery without delay in extubation or changes in haemodynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Innovative technique of corking the lumen of an intraoperatively decompressed turgid gall bladder with surgical gauze to prevent gall bladder stone/bile spillage during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Single-docking robot-assisted radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with partial left nephrectomy in a patient with synchronous pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Utilising uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pericardial window: A 12-year single-centre experience in the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial effusion. Effect of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure on post-operative pulmonary complications in overweight patients undergoing elective laparoscopic hernia surgery: A prospective randomised controlled trial. Stitch-induced caecal fecolith: An unusual long-term complication following laparoscopic appendicectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1