脉冲场消融中的心脏选择性。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Opinion in Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001183
Fanchao Meng, Shuqi Jin, Nian Liu
{"title":"脉冲场消融中的心脏选择性。","authors":"Fanchao Meng, Shuqi Jin, Nian Liu","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines the selective cardiac injury induced by pulsed electric fields during atrial fibrillation ablation. It consolidates findings from both preclinical and clinical studies on cardiac selectivity and explores the potential mechanisms behind this selectivity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Preclinical studies indicate that pulsed electric fields cause significantly more myocardial injury compared with other tissues. Clinical studies have similarly shown that complication rates for pulsed field ablation are notably lower than those for radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Pulsed field ablation demonstrates a notable selectivity for myocardial injury, likely because of the unique functional and metabolic characteristics of cardiomyocytes. This review delves into the underlying principles of cardiac selectivity and proposes future directions for improving this selectivity. It is important to note that while pulsed field ablation shows promise, its cardiac selectivity is not absolute, as some complications still occur, necessitating further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Fanchao Meng, Shuqi Jin, Nian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines the selective cardiac injury induced by pulsed electric fields during atrial fibrillation ablation. It consolidates findings from both preclinical and clinical studies on cardiac selectivity and explores the potential mechanisms behind this selectivity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Preclinical studies indicate that pulsed electric fields cause significantly more myocardial injury compared with other tissues. Clinical studies have similarly shown that complication rates for pulsed field ablation are notably lower than those for radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Pulsed field ablation demonstrates a notable selectivity for myocardial injury, likely because of the unique functional and metabolic characteristics of cardiomyocytes. This review delves into the underlying principles of cardiac selectivity and proposes future directions for improving this selectivity. It is important to note that while pulsed field ablation shows promise, its cardiac selectivity is not absolute, as some complications still occur, necessitating further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本文综述了心房颤动消融过程中脉冲电场引起的选择性心脏损伤。它整合了临床前和临床对心脏选择性的研究结果,并探讨了这种选择性背后的潜在机制。最新发现:临床前研究表明,脉冲电场引起的心肌损伤明显高于其他组织。临床研究同样表明,脉冲场消融的并发症发生率明显低于射频和低温球囊消融。摘要:脉冲场消融对心肌损伤具有显著的选择性,可能是因为心肌细胞独特的功能和代谢特性。这篇综述深入研究了心脏选择性的基本原理,并提出了提高这种选择性的未来方向。值得注意的是,虽然脉冲场消融显示出前景,但其心脏选择性不是绝对的,因为一些并发症仍然存在,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation.

Purpose of review: This review examines the selective cardiac injury induced by pulsed electric fields during atrial fibrillation ablation. It consolidates findings from both preclinical and clinical studies on cardiac selectivity and explores the potential mechanisms behind this selectivity.

Recent findings: Preclinical studies indicate that pulsed electric fields cause significantly more myocardial injury compared with other tissues. Clinical studies have similarly shown that complication rates for pulsed field ablation are notably lower than those for radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation.

Summary: Pulsed field ablation demonstrates a notable selectivity for myocardial injury, likely because of the unique functional and metabolic characteristics of cardiomyocytes. This review delves into the underlying principles of cardiac selectivity and proposes future directions for improving this selectivity. It is important to note that while pulsed field ablation shows promise, its cardiac selectivity is not absolute, as some complications still occur, necessitating further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
The impact of sleep on heart health: contemporary research and medical practice. Aldosterone synthase inhibition in hypertension: an evolving therapeutic strategy. Liver lesions in Fontan-associated liver disease: current challenges and future directions. Beyond the 2025 guidelines: tailoring hypertension management to the underlying pathogenic pathway in the age of precision medicine. Impact of social determinants of health on cardiovascular health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1