围手术期疼痛管理研究的关键途径。

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.004
Girish P. Joshi , Helene Beloeil , Dileep N. Lobo , Esther M. Pogatzki-Zahn , Axel R. Sauter , Marc Van de Velde , Christopher L. Wu , Henrik Kehlet
{"title":"围手术期疼痛管理研究的关键途径。","authors":"Girish P. Joshi ,&nbsp;Helene Beloeil ,&nbsp;Dileep N. Lobo ,&nbsp;Esther M. Pogatzki-Zahn ,&nbsp;Axel R. Sauter ,&nbsp;Marc Van de Velde ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Wu ,&nbsp;Henrik Kehlet","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimal postoperative pain management is a prerequisite for enhancing functional recovery after surgery. However, many studies assessing analgesic interventions have limitations. Consequently, further improvements in study design are urgently needed. In this focused editorial, we critically review prevalent trial designs and outcome measures including treatment-related adverse events evaluating analgesic interventions. Novel clinical trial designs should improve efficiency and enhance the likelihood of detecting relevant treatment effects. Cohort and database studies using propensity score matching and directed acyclic graphs could provide real-world generalisable information. Procedure-specific and patient-specific trials should allow identification of subpopulations most likely to benefit from a particular intervention after a specific surgical procedure and thus ascertain optimal analgesic strategies in challenging populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 3","pages":"Pages 621-626"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical approach to research on perioperative pain management\",\"authors\":\"Girish P. Joshi ,&nbsp;Helene Beloeil ,&nbsp;Dileep N. Lobo ,&nbsp;Esther M. Pogatzki-Zahn ,&nbsp;Axel R. Sauter ,&nbsp;Marc Van de Velde ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Wu ,&nbsp;Henrik Kehlet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Optimal postoperative pain management is a prerequisite for enhancing functional recovery after surgery. However, many studies assessing analgesic interventions have limitations. Consequently, further improvements in study design are urgently needed. In this focused editorial, we critically review prevalent trial designs and outcome measures including treatment-related adverse events evaluating analgesic interventions. Novel clinical trial designs should improve efficiency and enhance the likelihood of detecting relevant treatment effects. Cohort and database studies using propensity score matching and directed acyclic graphs could provide real-world generalisable information. Procedure-specific and patient-specific trials should allow identification of subpopulations most likely to benefit from a particular intervention after a specific surgical procedure and thus ascertain optimal analgesic strategies in challenging populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"134 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 621-626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224006615\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224006615","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最佳的术后疼痛管理是增强术后功能恢复的先决条件。然而,许多评估镇痛干预的研究都有局限性。因此,迫切需要进一步改进研究设计。在这篇重点社论中,我们批判性地回顾了流行的试验设计和结果测量,包括评估镇痛干预的治疗相关不良事件。新的临床试验设计应提高效率,提高检测相关治疗效果的可能性。使用倾向评分匹配和有向无环图的队列和数据库研究可以提供真实世界的可推广信息。手术特异性和患者特异性试验应允许识别最可能从特定外科手术后的特定干预中获益的亚群,从而确定具有挑战性人群的最佳镇痛策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A critical approach to research on perioperative pain management
Optimal postoperative pain management is a prerequisite for enhancing functional recovery after surgery. However, many studies assessing analgesic interventions have limitations. Consequently, further improvements in study design are urgently needed. In this focused editorial, we critically review prevalent trial designs and outcome measures including treatment-related adverse events evaluating analgesic interventions. Novel clinical trial designs should improve efficiency and enhance the likelihood of detecting relevant treatment effects. Cohort and database studies using propensity score matching and directed acyclic graphs could provide real-world generalisable information. Procedure-specific and patient-specific trials should allow identification of subpopulations most likely to benefit from a particular intervention after a specific surgical procedure and thus ascertain optimal analgesic strategies in challenging populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
Gucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and pulmonary aspiration: stratify physiology, not prescriptions. Minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation for all? Consensus clinical guidance from Italy. Flow-controlled ventilation: general settings and compliance-guided positive end-expiratory pressure and driving pressure titrations. Morphine and hydromorphone pharmacodynamics in human volunteers: sensitivity to benefit-harm thresholds. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 1459-71. Intrathecal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine plus fentanyl for anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: noninferiority analysis and exclusions. Response to Br J Anaesth 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2026.02.052.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1