心碎差异:体育相关心源性猝死中性别差异的叙事回顾

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.002
Mallory E. Shasteen MD , Mary K. Wurzelmann MD , Alyson J. McGregor MD , Neha P. Raukar MD, MS
{"title":"心碎差异:体育相关心源性猝死中性别差异的叙事回顾","authors":"Mallory E. Shasteen MD ,&nbsp;Mary K. Wurzelmann MD ,&nbsp;Alyson J. McGregor MD ,&nbsp;Neha P. Raukar MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Sports-related sudden cardiac death (srSCD) represents a rare yet significant occurrence. This review aims to explore the epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of srSCD, with a particular focus on the influence of sex and gender. It seeks to analyze existing literature to elucidate the impact of biological variables, societal factors, and preventive measures in understanding and addressing srSCD among athletes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A narrative review approach was utilized to synthesize relevant literature on srSCD, using a validated PubMed Search tool for sex and gender-related factors. The review focused on primary data investigating sex differences that may contribute to srSCD, as well as pertinent review articles.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The review highlights the complexity of defining and studying srSCD, with challenges stemming from varied reporting methods and lack of standardized definitions. Disparities in incidence rates between male and female athletes are evident, with males exhibiting a disproportionately higher risk. Biological factors, including cardiac adaptations to exercise and sex hormone influences, contribute to these sex-specific differences in srSCD rates. While screening programs, particularly utilizing electrocardiograms, show promise in identifying at-risk individuals, debates persist regarding their implementation and efficacy. Furthermore, legislative gaps in mandating the availability of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) in public settings underscore the need for unified advocacy efforts to improve access to life-saving interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Understanding the multifaceted nature of srSCD, including its biological underpinnings and societal implications, is crucial for developing effective preventive strategies. Sex-specific screening programs tailored to the unique risk profiles of male and female athletes, as well as legislative initiatives promoting AED placement and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, are essential components of comprehensive srSCD prevention efforts. By addressing disparities and implementing evidence-based interventions, this paper advocates for a holistic approach to mitigate the risk of srSCD and enhance the safety and well-being of athletes across all levels of competition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"46 12","pages":"Pages 982-987"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart Breaking Differences: A Narrative Review of Sex and Gender Disparities in Sports-Related Sudden Cardiac Death\",\"authors\":\"Mallory E. Shasteen MD ,&nbsp;Mary K. Wurzelmann MD ,&nbsp;Alyson J. McGregor MD ,&nbsp;Neha P. Raukar MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Sports-related sudden cardiac death (srSCD) represents a rare yet significant occurrence. This review aims to explore the epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of srSCD, with a particular focus on the influence of sex and gender. It seeks to analyze existing literature to elucidate the impact of biological variables, societal factors, and preventive measures in understanding and addressing srSCD among athletes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A narrative review approach was utilized to synthesize relevant literature on srSCD, using a validated PubMed Search tool for sex and gender-related factors. The review focused on primary data investigating sex differences that may contribute to srSCD, as well as pertinent review articles.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The review highlights the complexity of defining and studying srSCD, with challenges stemming from varied reporting methods and lack of standardized definitions. Disparities in incidence rates between male and female athletes are evident, with males exhibiting a disproportionately higher risk. Biological factors, including cardiac adaptations to exercise and sex hormone influences, contribute to these sex-specific differences in srSCD rates. While screening programs, particularly utilizing electrocardiograms, show promise in identifying at-risk individuals, debates persist regarding their implementation and efficacy. Furthermore, legislative gaps in mandating the availability of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) in public settings underscore the need for unified advocacy efforts to improve access to life-saving interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Understanding the multifaceted nature of srSCD, including its biological underpinnings and societal implications, is crucial for developing effective preventive strategies. Sex-specific screening programs tailored to the unique risk profiles of male and female athletes, as well as legislative initiatives promoting AED placement and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, are essential components of comprehensive srSCD prevention efforts. By addressing disparities and implementing evidence-based interventions, this paper advocates for a holistic approach to mitigate the risk of srSCD and enhance the safety and well-being of athletes across all levels of competition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"46 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 982-987\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014929182400328X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014929182400328X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:运动相关性心源性猝死(srSCD)是一种罕见但意义重大的疾病。本文旨在探讨srSCD的流行病学、病因学和预防,并特别关注性别和性别的影响。本研究旨在分析现有文献,阐明生物变量、社会因素和预防措施对理解和解决运动员srSCD的影响。方法:采用叙述性综述的方法,综合srSCD的相关文献,使用经过验证的PubMed Search工具检索性别和性别相关因素。该综述集中于调查可能导致srSCD的性别差异的原始数据,以及相关的综述文章。研究结果:该综述强调了定义和研究srSCD的复杂性,以及各种报告方法和缺乏标准化定义所带来的挑战。男性和女性运动员之间发病率的差异是明显的,男性表现出不成比例的高风险。生物因素,包括心脏对运动的适应和性激素的影响,促成了srSCD发病率的这些性别特异性差异。虽然筛查项目,特别是利用心电图,在识别高危人群方面显示出希望,但关于其实施和有效性的争论仍然存在。此外,在强制公共场所提供自动体外除颤器(aed)方面存在立法空白,这突出表明需要开展统一的宣传工作,以改善获得挽救生命干预措施的机会。意义:了解srSCD的多面性,包括其生物学基础和社会影响,对于制定有效的预防策略至关重要。针对男性和女性运动员独特的风险特征量身定制的性别筛查项目,以及促进AED安置和心肺复苏培训的立法举措,是全面预防srSCD工作的重要组成部分。通过解决差异和实施基于证据的干预措施,本文提倡采用一种整体方法来减轻srSCD的风险,并提高各级比赛运动员的安全和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heart Breaking Differences: A Narrative Review of Sex and Gender Disparities in Sports-Related Sudden Cardiac Death

Purpose

Sports-related sudden cardiac death (srSCD) represents a rare yet significant occurrence. This review aims to explore the epidemiology, etiology, and prevention of srSCD, with a particular focus on the influence of sex and gender. It seeks to analyze existing literature to elucidate the impact of biological variables, societal factors, and preventive measures in understanding and addressing srSCD among athletes.

Methods

A narrative review approach was utilized to synthesize relevant literature on srSCD, using a validated PubMed Search tool for sex and gender-related factors. The review focused on primary data investigating sex differences that may contribute to srSCD, as well as pertinent review articles.

Findings

The review highlights the complexity of defining and studying srSCD, with challenges stemming from varied reporting methods and lack of standardized definitions. Disparities in incidence rates between male and female athletes are evident, with males exhibiting a disproportionately higher risk. Biological factors, including cardiac adaptations to exercise and sex hormone influences, contribute to these sex-specific differences in srSCD rates. While screening programs, particularly utilizing electrocardiograms, show promise in identifying at-risk individuals, debates persist regarding their implementation and efficacy. Furthermore, legislative gaps in mandating the availability of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) in public settings underscore the need for unified advocacy efforts to improve access to life-saving interventions.

Implications

Understanding the multifaceted nature of srSCD, including its biological underpinnings and societal implications, is crucial for developing effective preventive strategies. Sex-specific screening programs tailored to the unique risk profiles of male and female athletes, as well as legislative initiatives promoting AED placement and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, are essential components of comprehensive srSCD prevention efforts. By addressing disparities and implementing evidence-based interventions, this paper advocates for a holistic approach to mitigate the risk of srSCD and enhance the safety and well-being of athletes across all levels of competition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
Economic Value of Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses for Cataract Surgery in Italy. Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of a Liposomal Carrier for Low-Dose Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (Clopidogrel and Aspirin) in Coronary Heart Disease Patients. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of SOX Plus Bevacizumab Versus SOX Plus Cetuximab for First-Line Treatment of KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan. Febuxostat, a Urate-Lowering Drug Bridging From Adults to Pediatrics; A Brief Report. Impact of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Epilepsy on Patterns of Use and Cost of Healthcare Services and Pharmacotherapy Among Medicare Enrollees: Findings From Analyses of Healthcare Claims From the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1